老年的哲学方法和一些生物伦理考虑

Lourdes Velázquez
{"title":"老年的哲学方法和一些生物伦理考虑","authors":"Lourdes Velázquez","doi":"10.1016/j.bioet.2020.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prolongation of human life is one of the characteristic features of our technological era and establishes a scenario for philosophical questions, some of which begin to find answers in the field of Bioethics. One of the most important is the so-called institutionalisation in prolonged care, or confinement, and the question is whether this is a bioethically correct option. A positive assessment of old age is part of the very roots of Western culture, however in technologically advanced societies it begins to be accompanied by negative nuances. Far from giving a positive value to old age, a new unethical myth has surfaced: that of the «young», «productive» man. Society often deprives the elderly of almost all obligations, relegating them when their work is no longer desired. The bioethical approach to the geriatric patient grants the respect owed to them as human beings instead of pity, compassion or charity. Something similar can be said of hospitalisation, which has been shown to have negative effects on the functional capacity of the elderly. In particular, this practice increases one of the most negative factors in the life of the elderly, loneliness. To combat this loneliness there are some possibilities, the first of which is to put the elderly person in contact with other people. In addition, there are new tools for combatting the loneliness of the elderly: laughter therapy and social robotics. A brief description of these is presented, as a well a discussion on their adoption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100174,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics Update","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 46-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bioet.2020.03.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Un enfoque filosófico de la vejez y algunas consideraciones bioéticas\",\"authors\":\"Lourdes Velázquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bioet.2020.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The prolongation of human life is one of the characteristic features of our technological era and establishes a scenario for philosophical questions, some of which begin to find answers in the field of Bioethics. One of the most important is the so-called institutionalisation in prolonged care, or confinement, and the question is whether this is a bioethically correct option. A positive assessment of old age is part of the very roots of Western culture, however in technologically advanced societies it begins to be accompanied by negative nuances. Far from giving a positive value to old age, a new unethical myth has surfaced: that of the «young», «productive» man. Society often deprives the elderly of almost all obligations, relegating them when their work is no longer desired. The bioethical approach to the geriatric patient grants the respect owed to them as human beings instead of pity, compassion or charity. Something similar can be said of hospitalisation, which has been shown to have negative effects on the functional capacity of the elderly. In particular, this practice increases one of the most negative factors in the life of the elderly, loneliness. To combat this loneliness there are some possibilities, the first of which is to put the elderly person in contact with other people. In addition, there are new tools for combatting the loneliness of the elderly: laughter therapy and social robotics. A brief description of these is presented, as a well a discussion on their adoption.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioethics Update\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 46-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bioet.2020.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioethics Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2395938X20300036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2395938X20300036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人类寿命的延长是我们这个技术时代的特征之一,并为哲学问题建立了一个场景,其中一些问题开始在生命伦理学领域找到答案。其中最重要的是所谓的长期护理或监禁的制度化,问题是这是否是一个生物伦理上正确的选择。对老年的积极评价是西方文化根源的一部分,然而在科技发达的社会中,它开始伴随着消极的细微差别。一个新的不道德的神话浮出水面:“年轻”、“有生产力”的人,而不是给老年一个积极的价值。社会经常剥夺老年人几乎所有的义务,当他们的工作不再被需要时,他们就被降级。对老年病人的生物伦理方法给予他们作为人应有的尊重,而不是怜悯、同情或慈善。住院治疗也有类似的情况,这已被证明对老年人的功能能力有负面影响。特别是,这种做法增加了老年人生活中最负面的因素之一——孤独。为了对抗这种孤独,有一些可能性,其中第一个是让老人与其他人接触。此外,还有一些对抗老年人孤独的新工具:笑声疗法和社交机器人。本文对这些建议作了简要说明,并讨论了采用这些建议的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Un enfoque filosófico de la vejez y algunas consideraciones bioéticas

The prolongation of human life is one of the characteristic features of our technological era and establishes a scenario for philosophical questions, some of which begin to find answers in the field of Bioethics. One of the most important is the so-called institutionalisation in prolonged care, or confinement, and the question is whether this is a bioethically correct option. A positive assessment of old age is part of the very roots of Western culture, however in technologically advanced societies it begins to be accompanied by negative nuances. Far from giving a positive value to old age, a new unethical myth has surfaced: that of the «young», «productive» man. Society often deprives the elderly of almost all obligations, relegating them when their work is no longer desired. The bioethical approach to the geriatric patient grants the respect owed to them as human beings instead of pity, compassion or charity. Something similar can be said of hospitalisation, which has been shown to have negative effects on the functional capacity of the elderly. In particular, this practice increases one of the most negative factors in the life of the elderly, loneliness. To combat this loneliness there are some possibilities, the first of which is to put the elderly person in contact with other people. In addition, there are new tools for combatting the loneliness of the elderly: laughter therapy and social robotics. A brief description of these is presented, as a well a discussion on their adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信