{"title":"用于测量局部放电起始电压的定义的影响","authors":"M. Pompili, C. Mazzetti, M. Libotte, E. Forster","doi":"10.1109/14.249373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, several definitions of partial discharge inception voltage (PDIV) have been advanced. To establish the value of each of these definitions, four practical electrical insulating fluids are selected, and their PDIV is determined according to three of these different specifications. The results suggest that the use of PDIV as a quality criterion generally is not warranted. The significance of these findings is discussed. >","PeriodicalId":13105,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation","volume":"1 1","pages":"1002-1006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of the definition used in measuring partial discharge inception voltages\",\"authors\":\"M. Pompili, C. Mazzetti, M. Libotte, E. Forster\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/14.249373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At present, several definitions of partial discharge inception voltage (PDIV) have been advanced. To establish the value of each of these definitions, four practical electrical insulating fluids are selected, and their PDIV is determined according to three of these different specifications. The results suggest that the use of PDIV as a quality criterion generally is not warranted. The significance of these findings is discussed. >\",\"PeriodicalId\":13105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1002-1006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/14.249373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/14.249373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of the definition used in measuring partial discharge inception voltages
At present, several definitions of partial discharge inception voltage (PDIV) have been advanced. To establish the value of each of these definitions, four practical electrical insulating fluids are selected, and their PDIV is determined according to three of these different specifications. The results suggest that the use of PDIV as a quality criterion generally is not warranted. The significance of these findings is discussed. >