资助当代儿童电视:数字融合如何鼓励复古重启

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
A. Potter
{"title":"资助当代儿童电视:数字融合如何鼓励复古重启","authors":"A. Potter","doi":"10.1080/14241277.2017.1298108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Contemporary children enjoy abundant supplies of television made especially for them, delivered across multiple platforms by a range of providers that includes public service broadcasters, pay-television services, and subscription video on demand services. Although digital regimes undermined longstanding funding models for children’s television and reduced the production of local content in the United Kingdom and Australia, the demands of new market entrant subscription video on demand services striving to establish themselves in global markets have increased the value of the intellectual property of children’s screen content. ITV Studios’ 2015 re-make of the 1960s Supermarionation series, Thunderbirds, is used here as a case study to illustrate how convergence has contributed to a culture of re-booting in children’s television, a genre for which consumer products have long been used to underpin program production costs. Importantly, the licence fees paid by subscription video on demand services—Netflix had a $5 billion programming budget in 2015—have begun to provide additional, significant sources of funding for production budgets, while also ensuring the rapid visibility of program brands in global television markets, particularly the United States. New means of multi-platform distribution also erode the centrality of traditional broadcasters to program commissioning and funding. While this shift in power relations between broadcasters and producers may be welcomed by the production sector, the increasing importance of global subscription video on-demand services in the funding of contemporary children’s television poses a threat to locally produced, culturally specific television for children.","PeriodicalId":45531,"journal":{"name":"JMM-International Journal on Media Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Funding Contemporary Children’s Television: How Digital Convergence Encourages Retro Reboots\",\"authors\":\"A. Potter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14241277.2017.1298108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Contemporary children enjoy abundant supplies of television made especially for them, delivered across multiple platforms by a range of providers that includes public service broadcasters, pay-television services, and subscription video on demand services. Although digital regimes undermined longstanding funding models for children’s television and reduced the production of local content in the United Kingdom and Australia, the demands of new market entrant subscription video on demand services striving to establish themselves in global markets have increased the value of the intellectual property of children’s screen content. ITV Studios’ 2015 re-make of the 1960s Supermarionation series, Thunderbirds, is used here as a case study to illustrate how convergence has contributed to a culture of re-booting in children’s television, a genre for which consumer products have long been used to underpin program production costs. Importantly, the licence fees paid by subscription video on demand services—Netflix had a $5 billion programming budget in 2015—have begun to provide additional, significant sources of funding for production budgets, while also ensuring the rapid visibility of program brands in global television markets, particularly the United States. New means of multi-platform distribution also erode the centrality of traditional broadcasters to program commissioning and funding. While this shift in power relations between broadcasters and producers may be welcomed by the production sector, the increasing importance of global subscription video on-demand services in the funding of contemporary children’s television poses a threat to locally produced, culturally specific television for children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMM-International Journal on Media Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMM-International Journal on Media Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2017.1298108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMM-International Journal on Media Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2017.1298108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

当代儿童享受着大量专门为他们制作的电视节目,这些节目由一系列提供商跨多个平台提供,包括公共服务广播公司、付费电视服务和订阅视频点播服务。虽然数字制度破坏了儿童电视的长期筹资模式,并减少了联合王国和澳大利亚本地内容的制作,但新进入市场的订阅视频点播服务的需求增加了儿童屏幕内容的知识产权价值,这些服务正在努力在全球市场上立足。2015年,ITV Studios翻拍了上世纪60年代的《超级民族》(Supermarionation)系列,《雷鸟》(Thunderbirds)在这里被作为一个案例来研究,以说明融合如何促成了儿童电视领域的重新启动文化。长期以来,消费产品一直被用来支撑儿童电视节目的制作成本。重要的是,订阅视频点播服务支付的许可费——netflix在2015年的节目预算为50亿美元——已经开始为制作预算提供额外的、重要的资金来源,同时也确保了节目品牌在全球电视市场(尤其是美国)的快速知名度。多平台发行的新手段也削弱了传统广播公司在节目委托和资金方面的中心地位。虽然广播公司和制片人之间权力关系的这种转变可能受到制作部门的欢迎,但全球订阅视频点播服务在资助当代儿童电视方面的重要性日益增加,这对当地制作的具有文化特色的儿童电视构成了威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Funding Contemporary Children’s Television: How Digital Convergence Encourages Retro Reboots
ABSTRACT Contemporary children enjoy abundant supplies of television made especially for them, delivered across multiple platforms by a range of providers that includes public service broadcasters, pay-television services, and subscription video on demand services. Although digital regimes undermined longstanding funding models for children’s television and reduced the production of local content in the United Kingdom and Australia, the demands of new market entrant subscription video on demand services striving to establish themselves in global markets have increased the value of the intellectual property of children’s screen content. ITV Studios’ 2015 re-make of the 1960s Supermarionation series, Thunderbirds, is used here as a case study to illustrate how convergence has contributed to a culture of re-booting in children’s television, a genre for which consumer products have long been used to underpin program production costs. Importantly, the licence fees paid by subscription video on demand services—Netflix had a $5 billion programming budget in 2015—have begun to provide additional, significant sources of funding for production budgets, while also ensuring the rapid visibility of program brands in global television markets, particularly the United States. New means of multi-platform distribution also erode the centrality of traditional broadcasters to program commissioning and funding. While this shift in power relations between broadcasters and producers may be welcomed by the production sector, the increasing importance of global subscription video on-demand services in the funding of contemporary children’s television poses a threat to locally produced, culturally specific television for children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信