安全公司:可持续性运营的另一种方法

Paul Gilding, Murray Hogarth, Rick Humphries
{"title":"安全公司:可持续性运营的另一种方法","authors":"Paul Gilding,&nbsp;Murray Hogarth,&nbsp;Rick Humphries","doi":"10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00108-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The track record of the past decade shows that sustainability has had a difficult time getting traction inside corporations. In large measure, this is because it is a fuzzy and unproven concept – business executives require clarity to move forward. One way around this hurdle is by focusing on safety, which can provide an effective platform for helping companies make the transition to sustainability. In many ways, the two concepts are quite similar. Both are about increasing the prospects for human health and happiness. Yet, unlike sustainability, safety is well understood and actionable, and it is also an increasingly high priority in our post-9-11 era. A focus on safety provides senior executives a path up a Safety-Sustainability Continuum that starts with the workplace and proceeds to traditional functional business areas such as safer R&amp;D and correspondingly products. Ultimately this leads to activities that are intended not only to reduce a company's negative “footprint” (for instance, by making products less toxic) but by expanding their positive “footprint”, (e.g. by pursuing ecosystem restoration and regeneration). Ideally, a campaign to use safety as an entry point for operationalizing sustainability will have a dual emphasis, focusing equally on the human benefits of safety and the business case for pursuing safety (and, ultimately, sustainability).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100335,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Environmental Strategy","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 390-397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00108-2","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe Companies: An Alternative Approach to Operationalizing Sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Paul Gilding,&nbsp;Murray Hogarth,&nbsp;Rick Humphries\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00108-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The track record of the past decade shows that sustainability has had a difficult time getting traction inside corporations. In large measure, this is because it is a fuzzy and unproven concept – business executives require clarity to move forward. One way around this hurdle is by focusing on safety, which can provide an effective platform for helping companies make the transition to sustainability. In many ways, the two concepts are quite similar. Both are about increasing the prospects for human health and happiness. Yet, unlike sustainability, safety is well understood and actionable, and it is also an increasingly high priority in our post-9-11 era. A focus on safety provides senior executives a path up a Safety-Sustainability Continuum that starts with the workplace and proceeds to traditional functional business areas such as safer R&amp;D and correspondingly products. Ultimately this leads to activities that are intended not only to reduce a company's negative “footprint” (for instance, by making products less toxic) but by expanding their positive “footprint”, (e.g. by pursuing ecosystem restoration and regeneration). Ideally, a campaign to use safety as an entry point for operationalizing sustainability will have a dual emphasis, focusing equally on the human benefits of safety and the business case for pursuing safety (and, ultimately, sustainability).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Environmental Strategy\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 390-397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00108-2\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Environmental Strategy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1066793802001082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Environmental Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1066793802001082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

过去十年的记录显示,可持续性很难在企业内部获得支持。在很大程度上,这是因为这是一个模糊且未经证实的概念——企业高管需要清晰的思路才能前进。解决这一问题的方法之一是关注安全,这可以为帮助企业向可持续发展过渡提供一个有效的平台。在许多方面,这两个概念非常相似。两者都是关于增进人类健康和幸福的前景。然而,与可持续性不同的是,安全是很容易理解和可操作的,而且在我们的后9-11时代,它也越来越重要。对安全的关注为高级管理人员提供了一条通往安全-可持续性连续体的道路,从工作场所开始,一直延伸到传统的功能性业务领域,如更安全的研发和相应的产品。最终,这将导致一些活动,这些活动不仅旨在减少公司的负面“足迹”(例如,通过降低产品的毒性),而且还旨在扩大其积极的“足迹”(例如,通过追求生态系统的恢复和再生)。理想情况下,将安全作为可持续性操作的切入点的运动将具有双重重点,既关注安全对人类的好处,也关注追求安全(最终是可持续性)的商业案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safe Companies: An Alternative Approach to Operationalizing Sustainability

The track record of the past decade shows that sustainability has had a difficult time getting traction inside corporations. In large measure, this is because it is a fuzzy and unproven concept – business executives require clarity to move forward. One way around this hurdle is by focusing on safety, which can provide an effective platform for helping companies make the transition to sustainability. In many ways, the two concepts are quite similar. Both are about increasing the prospects for human health and happiness. Yet, unlike sustainability, safety is well understood and actionable, and it is also an increasingly high priority in our post-9-11 era. A focus on safety provides senior executives a path up a Safety-Sustainability Continuum that starts with the workplace and proceeds to traditional functional business areas such as safer R&D and correspondingly products. Ultimately this leads to activities that are intended not only to reduce a company's negative “footprint” (for instance, by making products less toxic) but by expanding their positive “footprint”, (e.g. by pursuing ecosystem restoration and regeneration). Ideally, a campaign to use safety as an entry point for operationalizing sustainability will have a dual emphasis, focusing equally on the human benefits of safety and the business case for pursuing safety (and, ultimately, sustainability).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信