{"title":"Comparison between the different Artificial Neural Network (ANN) accuracy in diagnosis of asthma: مقارنة بين اختلاف دقة الشبكات العصبية الاصطناعية في تشخيص مرض الربو","authors":"Hanein Omar Mohamed, Basma.F.Idris Hanein Omar Mohamed, Basma.F.Idris","doi":"10.26389/ajsrp.n260421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asthma is a chronic disease that is caused by inflammation of airways. Diagnosis, predication and classification of asthmatic are one of the major attractive areas of research for decades by using different and recent techniques, however the main problem of asthma is misdiagnosis. This paper simplifies and compare between different Artificial Neural Network techniques used to solve this problem by using different algorithms to getting a high level of accuracyin diagnosis, prediction, and classification of asthma like: (data mining algorithms, machine learning algorithms, deep machine learning algorithms), depending and passing through three stages: data acquisition, feature extracting, data classification. According to the comparison of different techniques the high accuracy achieved by ANN was (98.85%), and the low accuracy of it was (80%), despite of the accuracy achieved by Support Vector Machine (SVM) was (86%) when used Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient MFCC for feature extraction, while the accuracy was (99.34%) when used Relief for extracting feature. Based in our comparison we recommend that if the researchers used the same techniques they should to return to previous studies it to get high accuracy.","PeriodicalId":15747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of engineering sciences and information technology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of engineering sciences and information technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.n260421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
哮喘是由呼吸道炎症引起的慢性疾病。哮喘的诊断、预测和分类是近年来研究的热点之一,但哮喘的主要问题是误诊。本文对不同的人工神经网络技术进行了简化和比较,通过使用不同的算法(数据挖掘算法、机器学习算法、深度机器学习算法),通过数据采集、特征提取、数据分类三个阶段,得到了高水平的哮喘诊断、预测和分类的准确性。通过对不同技术的比较,ANN在使用Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient MFCC进行特征提取时,准确率高达(98.85%),而支持向量机(SVM)在使用Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient MFCC进行特征提取时,准确率高达(86%),而使用Relief进行特征提取时,准确率高达(99.34%),ANN的准确率较低(80%)。根据我们的比较,我们建议,如果研究人员使用相同的技术,他们应该回到以前的研究,以获得更高的准确性。
Comparison between the different Artificial Neural Network (ANN) accuracy in diagnosis of asthma: مقارنة بين اختلاف دقة الشبكات العصبية الاصطناعية في تشخيص مرض الربو
Asthma is a chronic disease that is caused by inflammation of airways. Diagnosis, predication and classification of asthmatic are one of the major attractive areas of research for decades by using different and recent techniques, however the main problem of asthma is misdiagnosis. This paper simplifies and compare between different Artificial Neural Network techniques used to solve this problem by using different algorithms to getting a high level of accuracyin diagnosis, prediction, and classification of asthma like: (data mining algorithms, machine learning algorithms, deep machine learning algorithms), depending and passing through three stages: data acquisition, feature extracting, data classification. According to the comparison of different techniques the high accuracy achieved by ANN was (98.85%), and the low accuracy of it was (80%), despite of the accuracy achieved by Support Vector Machine (SVM) was (86%) when used Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient MFCC for feature extraction, while the accuracy was (99.34%) when used Relief for extracting feature. Based in our comparison we recommend that if the researchers used the same techniques they should to return to previous studies it to get high accuracy.