用试验拉拔法预测GFRP土钉粘结应力的钢筋-混凝土粘结应力关系校正

Q3 Engineering
B. Hamedmirjafari, J. B. Bazzaz, S. Abrishami
{"title":"用试验拉拔法预测GFRP土钉粘结应力的钢筋-混凝土粘结应力关系校正","authors":"B. Hamedmirjafari, J. B. Bazzaz, S. Abrishami","doi":"10.22075/JRCE.2019.14856.1279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though steel bar is a conventional reinforcement in soil stabilization systems, the problem of corrosion of steel may lead to vast damages especially in aggressive environments. In the past decades, Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) materials have offered an effective solution to overcome the corrosion problem. Despite numerous bond stress-displacement models for reinforcements in concrete, there is a lack of models for FRP nails in grout. In this paper, the usability of four bond stress models (Malvar, EPB, CMR and Soroushian) of reinforcements in concrete was evaluated to predict the bond stress of FRP nails in grout. For this purpose, the results of several experimental pullout tests were used to calibrate the reinforcement-concrete bond stress models and the constant parameters were obtained. To evaluate the accuracy of the calibrated models, four statistical criteria of R2, SSE, RMSE and MAPE have been also determined for each model. Results showed that Malvar model with R2 of 0.94 and MAPE of %21 was deemed suitable for the prediction of bond stress of GFRP nails while CMR model is not recommended.","PeriodicalId":52415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibration of bar-Concrete Bond Stress Relationships for Bond Stress Prediction of GFRP Soil Nails Using Experimental Pullout Tests\",\"authors\":\"B. Hamedmirjafari, J. B. Bazzaz, S. Abrishami\",\"doi\":\"10.22075/JRCE.2019.14856.1279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even though steel bar is a conventional reinforcement in soil stabilization systems, the problem of corrosion of steel may lead to vast damages especially in aggressive environments. In the past decades, Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) materials have offered an effective solution to overcome the corrosion problem. Despite numerous bond stress-displacement models for reinforcements in concrete, there is a lack of models for FRP nails in grout. In this paper, the usability of four bond stress models (Malvar, EPB, CMR and Soroushian) of reinforcements in concrete was evaluated to predict the bond stress of FRP nails in grout. For this purpose, the results of several experimental pullout tests were used to calibrate the reinforcement-concrete bond stress models and the constant parameters were obtained. To evaluate the accuracy of the calibrated models, four statistical criteria of R2, SSE, RMSE and MAPE have been also determined for each model. Results showed that Malvar model with R2 of 0.94 and MAPE of %21 was deemed suitable for the prediction of bond stress of GFRP nails while CMR model is not recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2019.14856.1279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2019.14856.1279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管钢筋是土壤稳定系统中常用的加固手段,但钢筋的腐蚀问题可能会导致巨大的破坏,特别是在恶劣环境中。在过去的几十年里,纤维增强聚合物(FRP)材料为克服腐蚀问题提供了有效的解决方案。尽管混凝土中钢筋的粘结应力-位移模型有很多,但在灌浆中缺乏FRP钉的模型。本文评价了混凝土中钢筋的4种粘结应力模型(Malvar、EPB、CMR和Soroushian)预测FRP钉在灌浆中的粘结应力的适用性。为此,利用多次试验拉拔试验的结果对钢筋-混凝土粘结应力模型进行了标定,得到了恒定参数。为了评估校准模型的准确性,还为每个模型确定了R2、SSE、RMSE和MAPE四个统计标准。结果表明,R2为0.94、MAPE为%21的Malvar模型适合预测GFRP钉的粘结应力,而CMR模型不推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calibration of bar-Concrete Bond Stress Relationships for Bond Stress Prediction of GFRP Soil Nails Using Experimental Pullout Tests
Even though steel bar is a conventional reinforcement in soil stabilization systems, the problem of corrosion of steel may lead to vast damages especially in aggressive environments. In the past decades, Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) materials have offered an effective solution to overcome the corrosion problem. Despite numerous bond stress-displacement models for reinforcements in concrete, there is a lack of models for FRP nails in grout. In this paper, the usability of four bond stress models (Malvar, EPB, CMR and Soroushian) of reinforcements in concrete was evaluated to predict the bond stress of FRP nails in grout. For this purpose, the results of several experimental pullout tests were used to calibrate the reinforcement-concrete bond stress models and the constant parameters were obtained. To evaluate the accuracy of the calibrated models, four statistical criteria of R2, SSE, RMSE and MAPE have been also determined for each model. Results showed that Malvar model with R2 of 0.94 and MAPE of %21 was deemed suitable for the prediction of bond stress of GFRP nails while CMR model is not recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信