大流行管理策略对不列颠哥伦比亚省一家长期护理机构工作人员心理健康、工作行为和住院护理的影响:一项混合方法研究

Q2 Health Professions
Farinaz Havaei, Ibrahim Abughori, Yue-Li Mao, Sabina Staempfli, Andy Ma, M. MacPhee, A. Phinney, David Keselman, Loren Tisdelle, Dan Galazka, V. Anderson
{"title":"大流行管理策略对不列颠哥伦比亚省一家长期护理机构工作人员心理健康、工作行为和住院护理的影响:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Farinaz Havaei, Ibrahim Abughori, Yue-Li Mao, Sabina Staempfli, Andy Ma, M. MacPhee, A. Phinney, David Keselman, Loren Tisdelle, Dan Galazka, V. Anderson","doi":"10.31389/jltc.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: To slow the spread of COVID-19 within the Canadian long-term residential care (LTRC) sector, a series of pandemic management strategies were introduced, including restricted visitation and single site employment. These strategies were enacted to prevent and control infection, resulting in unknown impact on direct care staff and staff capacity to deliver quality care or service. Objective: To explore staff reports of outcomes associated with LTRC pandemic management strategies, particularly their impact on LTRC staff mental health, work behaviours and quality of care or service provision. Method: This was a case study using mixed methods including a longitudinal survey and interviews with staff from one LTRC site in British Columbia. Survey data from 68 staff who participated in both survey times were analyzed using regressions with relative weight analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 LTRC staff and analyzed using content analysis. Findings: Survey data demonstrated that staff perceived the sick time policy and staffing levels as the most inadequate pandemic management strategies. Survey data also showed the visitation policy, the sick time policy and the single site employment policy were most significantly associated with negative outcomes to staff mental health, work behaviours and quality of care or service delivery. Qualitative data suggested connections between these policies and inadequate staffing levels and heavy workloads. Limitations: The study design along with the low response rate and the small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings to other settings. Implications: The development and implementation of pandemic management strategies must be informed by and give consideration to working conditions of LTRC staff including long standing systemic issues such as staffing shortages and heavy workloads. © 2022 The Author(s).","PeriodicalId":73807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Pandemic Management Strategies on Staff Mental Health, Work Behaviours, and Resident Care in One Long-Term Care Facility in British Columbia: A Mixed Method Study\",\"authors\":\"Farinaz Havaei, Ibrahim Abughori, Yue-Li Mao, Sabina Staempfli, Andy Ma, M. MacPhee, A. Phinney, David Keselman, Loren Tisdelle, Dan Galazka, V. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.31389/jltc.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: To slow the spread of COVID-19 within the Canadian long-term residential care (LTRC) sector, a series of pandemic management strategies were introduced, including restricted visitation and single site employment. These strategies were enacted to prevent and control infection, resulting in unknown impact on direct care staff and staff capacity to deliver quality care or service. Objective: To explore staff reports of outcomes associated with LTRC pandemic management strategies, particularly their impact on LTRC staff mental health, work behaviours and quality of care or service provision. Method: This was a case study using mixed methods including a longitudinal survey and interviews with staff from one LTRC site in British Columbia. Survey data from 68 staff who participated in both survey times were analyzed using regressions with relative weight analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 LTRC staff and analyzed using content analysis. Findings: Survey data demonstrated that staff perceived the sick time policy and staffing levels as the most inadequate pandemic management strategies. Survey data also showed the visitation policy, the sick time policy and the single site employment policy were most significantly associated with negative outcomes to staff mental health, work behaviours and quality of care or service delivery. Qualitative data suggested connections between these policies and inadequate staffing levels and heavy workloads. Limitations: The study design along with the low response rate and the small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings to other settings. Implications: The development and implementation of pandemic management strategies must be informed by and give consideration to working conditions of LTRC staff including long standing systemic issues such as staffing shortages and heavy workloads. © 2022 The Author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":73807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of long-term care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of long-term care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:为了减缓COVID-19在加拿大长期住宿护理(LTRC)部门的传播,引入了一系列大流行管理策略,包括限制访问和单一地点就业。制定这些战略是为了预防和控制感染,这对直接护理人员和工作人员提供高质量护理或服务的能力造成了未知的影响。目的:探讨工作人员报告的与ltc大流行管理战略相关的结果,特别是这些战略对ltc工作人员心理健康、工作行为和护理或服务提供质量的影响。方法:这是一个混合方法的案例研究,包括纵向调查和对不列颠哥伦比亚省一个LTRC站点的工作人员的访谈。对参加两次调查的68名员工的调查数据进行了回归分析和相对权重分析。对26名LTRC员工进行半结构化访谈,并采用内容分析法进行分析。调查结果:调查数据表明,工作人员认为病假政策和人员配备水平是最不充分的大流行病管理战略。调查数据还显示,探视政策、病假政策和单一地点就业政策与工作人员心理健康、工作行为和护理或服务质量的负面影响最显著相关。定性数据表明,这些政策与工作人员不足和工作量大之间存在联系。局限性:研究设计以及低回复率和小样本量限制了研究结果的推广到其他情况。影响:大流行病管理战略的制定和实施必须了解并考虑到ltc工作人员的工作条件,包括人员短缺和工作量繁重等长期存在的系统性问题。©2022作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Pandemic Management Strategies on Staff Mental Health, Work Behaviours, and Resident Care in One Long-Term Care Facility in British Columbia: A Mixed Method Study
Context: To slow the spread of COVID-19 within the Canadian long-term residential care (LTRC) sector, a series of pandemic management strategies were introduced, including restricted visitation and single site employment. These strategies were enacted to prevent and control infection, resulting in unknown impact on direct care staff and staff capacity to deliver quality care or service. Objective: To explore staff reports of outcomes associated with LTRC pandemic management strategies, particularly their impact on LTRC staff mental health, work behaviours and quality of care or service provision. Method: This was a case study using mixed methods including a longitudinal survey and interviews with staff from one LTRC site in British Columbia. Survey data from 68 staff who participated in both survey times were analyzed using regressions with relative weight analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 LTRC staff and analyzed using content analysis. Findings: Survey data demonstrated that staff perceived the sick time policy and staffing levels as the most inadequate pandemic management strategies. Survey data also showed the visitation policy, the sick time policy and the single site employment policy were most significantly associated with negative outcomes to staff mental health, work behaviours and quality of care or service delivery. Qualitative data suggested connections between these policies and inadequate staffing levels and heavy workloads. Limitations: The study design along with the low response rate and the small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings to other settings. Implications: The development and implementation of pandemic management strategies must be informed by and give consideration to working conditions of LTRC staff including long standing systemic issues such as staffing shortages and heavy workloads. © 2022 The Author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信