同性婚姻判决的合法性:查尔斯·布莱克谈奥贝格费尔

The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal : a student publication of the Marshall-Wythe School of Law Pub Date : 2017-01-09 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2638552

T. Massaro

{"title":"同性婚姻判决的合法性:查尔斯·布莱克谈奥贝格费尔","authors":"T. Massaro","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2638552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1960, Charles Black wrote a justly famous defense of Brown v Board of Education that he described as “awkwardly simple.” His eloquent, influential work offers an equally compelling defense of the Court’s recent decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. This Essay takes the Black argument as a template, and imposes onto it the same-sex marriage decisions. It also imagines how Black might respond to Chief Justice Robert’s dissent in Obergefell.","PeriodicalId":83315,"journal":{"name":"The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal : a student publication of the Marshall-Wythe School of Law","volume":"252 1","pages":"321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lawfulness of the Same-Sex Marriage Decisions: Charles Black on Obergefell\",\"authors\":\"T. Massaro\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2638552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1960, Charles Black wrote a justly famous defense of Brown v Board of Education that he described as “awkwardly simple.” His eloquent, influential work offers an equally compelling defense of the Court’s recent decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. This Essay takes the Black argument as a template, and imposes onto it the same-sex marriage decisions. It also imagines how Black might respond to Chief Justice Robert’s dissent in Obergefell.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal : a student publication of the Marshall-Wythe School of Law\",\"volume\":\"252 1\",\"pages\":\"321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal : a student publication of the Marshall-Wythe School of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2638552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal : a student publication of the Marshall-Wythe School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2638552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

1960年，查尔斯·布莱克(Charles Black)为布朗诉教育委员会案撰写了一份著名的辩护书，他称其“简单得令人尴尬”。他雄辩而有影响力的著作为法院最近对奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案的判决提供了同样令人信服的辩护。本文以黑人的论点为模板，将同性婚姻的决定强加于此。它还想象了布莱克将如何回应首席大法官罗伯特在奥贝格费尔案中的异议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Lawfulness of the Same-Sex Marriage Decisions: Charles Black on Obergefell

In 1960, Charles Black wrote a justly famous defense of Brown v Board of Education that he described as “awkwardly simple.” His eloquent, influential work offers an equally compelling defense of the Court’s recent decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. This Essay takes the Black argument as a template, and imposes onto it the same-sex marriage decisions. It also imagines how Black might respond to Chief Justice Robert’s dissent in Obergefell.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal : a student publication of the Marshall-Wythe School of Law

自引率

0.00%

发文量