控制医疗支出:让更多患者“参与其中”?

D. Orentlicher
{"title":"控制医疗支出:让更多患者“参与其中”?","authors":"D. Orentlicher","doi":"10.18060/3911.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While health care cost inflation slowed during the past few years, it has started to pick up again, and policy makers have good cause for concern about future increases in health care spending. Moreover, even if future increases moderate, policy makers rightly worry about the already high levels of U.S. spending. The need for effective cost containment strategies in health care persists, even though the Affordable Care Act appears to have had some success at containing health care costs.Health care spending reforms can focus on physician and hospital practices or on patient behavior, and popular reform proposals include both approaches. For example, rather than paying physicians and hospitals in terms of the quantity of care that they provide and encouraging the provision of too much care, private insurers and government programs are turning more and more to forms of reimbursement that are based on the quality of care delivered. Insurers often adjust physicians’ compensation based on whether they screen their patients for cancer or high cholesterol, administer recommended immunizations, or achieve good control of blood sugar levels for their patients with diabetes. The Affordable Care Act addresses patient behavior by requiring insurers to cover important kinds of preventive care for free. That way, people will not be discouraged for financial reasons from seeking early care that can keep them healthier and avoid the need for hospitalizations and other expensive treatments.In this article, I consider an increasingly common strategy that insurers use to influence patient behavior — giving people more “skin in the game.” When medical treatment can be obtained at very low cost, people may be too quick to seek it when they feel sick, visiting their physicians when they would do just as well by staying home. Hence, insurers have raised deductibles and co-payments and shifted the costs of care to patients in other ways in the hope that people will become more conscious of the costs of their care. Although concerns about patients seeking too much care are important, common strategies for giving patients more skin in the game have been poorly conceived. There is room for skin-in-the-game strategies to contain high health care spending, but only when they are properly designed.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlling Health Care Spending: More Patient 'Skin in the Game?'\",\"authors\":\"D. Orentlicher\",\"doi\":\"10.18060/3911.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While health care cost inflation slowed during the past few years, it has started to pick up again, and policy makers have good cause for concern about future increases in health care spending. Moreover, even if future increases moderate, policy makers rightly worry about the already high levels of U.S. spending. The need for effective cost containment strategies in health care persists, even though the Affordable Care Act appears to have had some success at containing health care costs.Health care spending reforms can focus on physician and hospital practices or on patient behavior, and popular reform proposals include both approaches. For example, rather than paying physicians and hospitals in terms of the quantity of care that they provide and encouraging the provision of too much care, private insurers and government programs are turning more and more to forms of reimbursement that are based on the quality of care delivered. Insurers often adjust physicians’ compensation based on whether they screen their patients for cancer or high cholesterol, administer recommended immunizations, or achieve good control of blood sugar levels for their patients with diabetes. The Affordable Care Act addresses patient behavior by requiring insurers to cover important kinds of preventive care for free. That way, people will not be discouraged for financial reasons from seeking early care that can keep them healthier and avoid the need for hospitalizations and other expensive treatments.In this article, I consider an increasingly common strategy that insurers use to influence patient behavior — giving people more “skin in the game.” When medical treatment can be obtained at very low cost, people may be too quick to seek it when they feel sick, visiting their physicians when they would do just as well by staying home. Hence, insurers have raised deductibles and co-payments and shifted the costs of care to patients in other ways in the hope that people will become more conscious of the costs of their care. Although concerns about patients seeking too much care are important, common strategies for giving patients more skin in the game have been poorly conceived. There is room for skin-in-the-game strategies to contain high health care spending, but only when they are properly designed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employee benefits journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employee benefits journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18060/3911.0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee benefits journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/3911.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然过去几年医疗保健费用的上涨速度有所放缓,但它已经开始再次回升,政策制定者有充分的理由担心未来医疗保健支出的增长。此外,即使未来的增长温和,政策制定者也有理由担心美国已经很高的支出水平。尽管《平价医疗法案》似乎在控制医疗费用方面取得了一些成功,但在医疗保健方面仍然需要有效的成本控制战略。医疗保健支出改革可以关注医生和医院的做法,也可以关注病人的行为,而广受欢迎的改革建议包括了这两种方法。例如,私人保险公司和政府项目正越来越多地转向基于所提供的医疗质量的报销形式,而不是根据医生和医院提供的医疗服务的数量来支付费用,也不是鼓励提供过多的医疗服务。保险公司通常会根据医生是否为患者筛查癌症或高胆固醇,是否进行推荐的免疫接种,是否为糖尿病患者实现良好的血糖控制,来调整医生的报酬。《平价医疗法案》通过要求保险公司免费提供重要的预防性医疗服务来解决患者的行为问题。这样,人们就不会因为经济原因而放弃寻求早期治疗,这可以让他们保持健康,避免住院治疗和其他昂贵的治疗。在这篇文章中,我考虑了保险公司用来影响病人行为的一种日益普遍的策略——让人们更多地“参与其中”。当医疗费用很低的时候,当人们感到不舒服的时候,他们可能会太快去找医生,而他们呆在家里也可以。因此,保险公司提高了免赔额和共同支付额,并以其他方式将医疗费用转嫁给患者,希望人们能够更加意识到他们的医疗费用。尽管对患者寻求过多护理的担忧很重要,但让患者在游戏中获得更多利益的常见策略却没有得到很好的考虑。只有在设计得当的情况下,游戏策略才有空间控制高额医疗保健支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controlling Health Care Spending: More Patient 'Skin in the Game?'
While health care cost inflation slowed during the past few years, it has started to pick up again, and policy makers have good cause for concern about future increases in health care spending. Moreover, even if future increases moderate, policy makers rightly worry about the already high levels of U.S. spending. The need for effective cost containment strategies in health care persists, even though the Affordable Care Act appears to have had some success at containing health care costs.Health care spending reforms can focus on physician and hospital practices or on patient behavior, and popular reform proposals include both approaches. For example, rather than paying physicians and hospitals in terms of the quantity of care that they provide and encouraging the provision of too much care, private insurers and government programs are turning more and more to forms of reimbursement that are based on the quality of care delivered. Insurers often adjust physicians’ compensation based on whether they screen their patients for cancer or high cholesterol, administer recommended immunizations, or achieve good control of blood sugar levels for their patients with diabetes. The Affordable Care Act addresses patient behavior by requiring insurers to cover important kinds of preventive care for free. That way, people will not be discouraged for financial reasons from seeking early care that can keep them healthier and avoid the need for hospitalizations and other expensive treatments.In this article, I consider an increasingly common strategy that insurers use to influence patient behavior — giving people more “skin in the game.” When medical treatment can be obtained at very low cost, people may be too quick to seek it when they feel sick, visiting their physicians when they would do just as well by staying home. Hence, insurers have raised deductibles and co-payments and shifted the costs of care to patients in other ways in the hope that people will become more conscious of the costs of their care. Although concerns about patients seeking too much care are important, common strategies for giving patients more skin in the game have been poorly conceived. There is room for skin-in-the-game strategies to contain high health care spending, but only when they are properly designed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信