聚焦波与漂浮结构的相互作用:一项盲比较研究

IF 1.1 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
E. Ransley, S. Brown, M. Hann, D. Greaves, C. Windt, J. Ringwood, J. Davidson, P. Schmitt, S. Yan, Junxian Wang, Jinghua Wang, Q. Ma, Zhihua Xie, G. Giorgi, Jack Hughes, A. Williams, I. Masters, Zaibin Lin, Hao Chen, L. Qian, Zhihua Ma, Qiang Chen, Haoyu Ding, J. Zang, J. V. Rij, Yi-Hsiang Yu, Zhaobin Li, B. Bouscasse, G. Ducrozet, H. Bingham
{"title":"聚焦波与漂浮结构的相互作用:一项盲比较研究","authors":"E. Ransley, S. Brown, M. Hann, D. Greaves, C. Windt, J. Ringwood, J. Davidson, P. Schmitt, S. Yan, Junxian Wang, Jinghua Wang, Q. Ma, Zhihua Xie, G. Giorgi, Jack Hughes, A. Williams, I. Masters, Zaibin Lin, Hao Chen, L. Qian, Zhihua Ma, Qiang Chen, Haoyu Ding, J. Zang, J. V. Rij, Yi-Hsiang Yu, Zhaobin Li, B. Bouscasse, G. Ducrozet, H. Bingham","doi":"10.1680/JENCM.20.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents results from the Collaborative Computational Project in Wave Structure Interaction (CCP-WSI) Blind Test Series 2. Without prior access to the physical data, participants, with numerical methods ranging from low-fidelity linear models to fully nonlinear Navier-Stokes (NS) solvers, simulate the interaction between focused wave events and two separate, taut-moored, floating structures: a hemispherical-bottomed cylinder and a cylinder with a moonpool. The ‘blind’ numerical predictions for heave, surge, pitch and mooring load, are compared against physical measurements. Dynamic time warping is used to quantify the predictive capability of participating methods. In general, NS solvers and hybrid methods give more accurate predictions; however, heave amplitude is predicted reasonably well by all methods; and a WEC-Sim implementation, with CFD-informed viscous terms, demonstrates comparable predictive capability to even the stronger NS solvers. Large variations in the solutions are observed (even among similar methods), highlighting a need for standardisation in the numerical modelling of WSI problems.","PeriodicalId":54061,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering and Computational Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focused wave interactions with floating structures: a blind comparative study\",\"authors\":\"E. Ransley, S. Brown, M. Hann, D. Greaves, C. Windt, J. Ringwood, J. Davidson, P. Schmitt, S. Yan, Junxian Wang, Jinghua Wang, Q. Ma, Zhihua Xie, G. Giorgi, Jack Hughes, A. Williams, I. Masters, Zaibin Lin, Hao Chen, L. Qian, Zhihua Ma, Qiang Chen, Haoyu Ding, J. Zang, J. V. Rij, Yi-Hsiang Yu, Zhaobin Li, B. Bouscasse, G. Ducrozet, H. Bingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/JENCM.20.00006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents results from the Collaborative Computational Project in Wave Structure Interaction (CCP-WSI) Blind Test Series 2. Without prior access to the physical data, participants, with numerical methods ranging from low-fidelity linear models to fully nonlinear Navier-Stokes (NS) solvers, simulate the interaction between focused wave events and two separate, taut-moored, floating structures: a hemispherical-bottomed cylinder and a cylinder with a moonpool. The ‘blind’ numerical predictions for heave, surge, pitch and mooring load, are compared against physical measurements. Dynamic time warping is used to quantify the predictive capability of participating methods. In general, NS solvers and hybrid methods give more accurate predictions; however, heave amplitude is predicted reasonably well by all methods; and a WEC-Sim implementation, with CFD-informed viscous terms, demonstrates comparable predictive capability to even the stronger NS solvers. Large variations in the solutions are observed (even among similar methods), highlighting a need for standardisation in the numerical modelling of WSI problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering and Computational Mechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering and Computational Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/JENCM.20.00006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering and Computational Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/JENCM.20.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

本文介绍了波浪结构相互作用协同计算项目(CCP-WSI)盲测系列2的结果。在没有事先获得物理数据的情况下,参与者使用从低保真线性模型到完全非线性Navier-Stokes (NS)求解器的数值方法,模拟聚焦波事件与两个独立的、系泊的浮动结构之间的相互作用:一个半球形底圆柱体和一个带月池的圆柱体。对升沉、浪涌、纵摇和系泊载荷的“盲目”数值预测与物理测量结果进行了比较。动态时间规整用于量化参与方法的预测能力。一般来说,NS求解器和混合方法给出了更准确的预测;然而,各种方法都能较好地预测升沉幅度;WEC-Sim实现具有cfd信息的粘性项,其预测能力甚至可以与更强大的NS求解器相媲美。在解决方案中观察到很大的差异(即使在类似的方法中),突出了在WSI问题的数值模拟中标准化的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Focused wave interactions with floating structures: a blind comparative study
The paper presents results from the Collaborative Computational Project in Wave Structure Interaction (CCP-WSI) Blind Test Series 2. Without prior access to the physical data, participants, with numerical methods ranging from low-fidelity linear models to fully nonlinear Navier-Stokes (NS) solvers, simulate the interaction between focused wave events and two separate, taut-moored, floating structures: a hemispherical-bottomed cylinder and a cylinder with a moonpool. The ‘blind’ numerical predictions for heave, surge, pitch and mooring load, are compared against physical measurements. Dynamic time warping is used to quantify the predictive capability of participating methods. In general, NS solvers and hybrid methods give more accurate predictions; however, heave amplitude is predicted reasonably well by all methods; and a WEC-Sim implementation, with CFD-informed viscous terms, demonstrates comparable predictive capability to even the stronger NS solvers. Large variations in the solutions are observed (even among similar methods), highlighting a need for standardisation in the numerical modelling of WSI problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信