Chrysanthe Preza, John M. Ollinger, James G. McNally, Lewis J. Thomas Jr.
{"title":"计算光学切片显微镜的点扩展灵敏度分析","authors":"Chrysanthe Preza, John M. Ollinger, James G. McNally, Lewis J. Thomas Jr.","doi":"10.1016/0739-6260(92)90024-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Experimentally determined point-spread functions (PSF) have been used routinely for reconstructions of three-dimensional (3-D) microscopic objects from optical sections (Agard <em>et al.</em>, 1989, <em>Meth. Cell Biol.</em>, <strong>30:</strong> 353–377; Fay <em>et al.</em>, 1986, <em>Opt. Meth. Cell Physiol.</em>, <strong>40:</strong> 51–63). The microscope's PSF is usually measured by imaging a small fluorescent bead. There is a tradeoff in this measurement: very small beads are dim and bleach rapidly, while larger beads are a poorer approximation to a point source.</p><p>We have simulated the effect of the bead's size on the shape of the PSF by convolving a theoretically determined PSF (of a 40 × 1.0 N.A. oil-immersion lens) with spheres of varying diameters. Simulated data were generated with a 3-D phantom and the theoretical PSF, which is defined to be the ‘true’ PSF for the simulation. Reconstructions of the phantom were obtained with each of the theoretical PSFs obtained from the beads using a regularized linear least-squares method (Preza <em>et al.</em>, 1992, <em>J. Opt. Soc. Am.</em>, <strong>9:</strong> 219–228). Results show a significant drop (more than 50%) in the signal-to-noise ratio of the reconstructions for beads with diameter large than 0.22 μm. These results suggest that the bead used in the PSF measurement should have a diameter less than 30% of the diameter of the first dark ring of the infocus two-dimensional (2-D) PSF. This study quantifies the tradeoff between the quality of the reconstructions and the bead size used in the PSF measurement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100925,"journal":{"name":"Micron and Microscopica Acta","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 501-513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0739-6260(92)90024-8","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-spread sensitivity analysis for computational optical-sectioning microscopy\",\"authors\":\"Chrysanthe Preza, John M. Ollinger, James G. McNally, Lewis J. Thomas Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0739-6260(92)90024-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Experimentally determined point-spread functions (PSF) have been used routinely for reconstructions of three-dimensional (3-D) microscopic objects from optical sections (Agard <em>et al.</em>, 1989, <em>Meth. Cell Biol.</em>, <strong>30:</strong> 353–377; Fay <em>et al.</em>, 1986, <em>Opt. Meth. Cell Physiol.</em>, <strong>40:</strong> 51–63). The microscope's PSF is usually measured by imaging a small fluorescent bead. There is a tradeoff in this measurement: very small beads are dim and bleach rapidly, while larger beads are a poorer approximation to a point source.</p><p>We have simulated the effect of the bead's size on the shape of the PSF by convolving a theoretically determined PSF (of a 40 × 1.0 N.A. oil-immersion lens) with spheres of varying diameters. Simulated data were generated with a 3-D phantom and the theoretical PSF, which is defined to be the ‘true’ PSF for the simulation. Reconstructions of the phantom were obtained with each of the theoretical PSFs obtained from the beads using a regularized linear least-squares method (Preza <em>et al.</em>, 1992, <em>J. Opt. Soc. Am.</em>, <strong>9:</strong> 219–228). Results show a significant drop (more than 50%) in the signal-to-noise ratio of the reconstructions for beads with diameter large than 0.22 μm. These results suggest that the bead used in the PSF measurement should have a diameter less than 30% of the diameter of the first dark ring of the infocus two-dimensional (2-D) PSF. This study quantifies the tradeoff between the quality of the reconstructions and the bead size used in the PSF measurement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Micron and Microscopica Acta\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 501-513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0739-6260(92)90024-8\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Micron and Microscopica Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0739626092900248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Micron and Microscopica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0739626092900248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
实验确定的点扩展函数(PSF)已被常规用于从光学切片重建三维(3-D)微观物体(Agard et al., 1989;细胞生物。, 30: 353-377;Fay et al., 1986;细胞杂志。, 40: 51-63)。显微镜的PSF通常是通过成像一个小的荧光珠来测量的。在这种测量中有一个权衡:非常小的珠子是暗淡的,漂白迅速,而较大的珠子是一个较差的近似点光源。我们通过将理论上确定的PSF (40 × 1.0 N.A.油浸透镜)与不同直径的球体进行卷积,模拟了珠的大小对PSF形状的影响。模拟数据由三维模型和理论PSF生成,该理论PSF被定义为模拟的“真实”PSF。利用正则化线性最小二乘法(Preza et al., 1992, J. Opt. Soc)对从珠子中获得的每个理论psf进行重建。点。科学通报,9:219-228)。结果表明,对于直径大于0.22 μm的微球,重构的信噪比明显下降(50%以上)。这些结果表明,用于PSF测量的珠的直径应小于聚焦二维PSF的第一个暗环直径的30%。本研究量化了重建质量和PSF测量中使用的磁珠尺寸之间的权衡。
Point-spread sensitivity analysis for computational optical-sectioning microscopy
Experimentally determined point-spread functions (PSF) have been used routinely for reconstructions of three-dimensional (3-D) microscopic objects from optical sections (Agard et al., 1989, Meth. Cell Biol., 30: 353–377; Fay et al., 1986, Opt. Meth. Cell Physiol., 40: 51–63). The microscope's PSF is usually measured by imaging a small fluorescent bead. There is a tradeoff in this measurement: very small beads are dim and bleach rapidly, while larger beads are a poorer approximation to a point source.
We have simulated the effect of the bead's size on the shape of the PSF by convolving a theoretically determined PSF (of a 40 × 1.0 N.A. oil-immersion lens) with spheres of varying diameters. Simulated data were generated with a 3-D phantom and the theoretical PSF, which is defined to be the ‘true’ PSF for the simulation. Reconstructions of the phantom were obtained with each of the theoretical PSFs obtained from the beads using a regularized linear least-squares method (Preza et al., 1992, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 9: 219–228). Results show a significant drop (more than 50%) in the signal-to-noise ratio of the reconstructions for beads with diameter large than 0.22 μm. These results suggest that the bead used in the PSF measurement should have a diameter less than 30% of the diameter of the first dark ring of the infocus two-dimensional (2-D) PSF. This study quantifies the tradeoff between the quality of the reconstructions and the bead size used in the PSF measurement.