“我们都可以发挥作用”:对南太平洋covid - 19危机政治言论行为的比较分析

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Sky Marsen, Zakia Ali-Chand
{"title":"“我们都可以发挥作用”:对南太平洋covid - 19危机政治言论行为的比较分析","authors":"Sky Marsen, Zakia Ali-Chand","doi":"10.1080/22041451.2022.2040701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article compares government communication on the COVID19 crisis in three countries: Australia, Fiji and New Zealand. It analyses six speeches made by each country’s leader , from March to June 2020, using speech act theory and discourse analysis. The study aimed to compare the discursive strategies used , to discuss these in relation to their respective socio-political contexts, and to examine the application of speech act theory to political crisis management, which is currently underexplored. To achieve these objectives, the research used an eclectic combination of crisis communication theory and speech act theory, examining how speech acts were used in crisis ‘base response’ strategies, such as ‘instructing’ and ‘adjusting’ information. The study found some notable differences in the degree of assertiveness, hesitation, and sympathy, which relate to differences in the political ideology of each government. It also found some similarities, especially in inclusion techniques and using media briefings as a promotional tool.","PeriodicalId":10644,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘We all have a role to play’: A comparative analysis of political speech acts on the COVID19 crisis in the South Pacific\",\"authors\":\"Sky Marsen, Zakia Ali-Chand\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22041451.2022.2040701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article compares government communication on the COVID19 crisis in three countries: Australia, Fiji and New Zealand. It analyses six speeches made by each country’s leader , from March to June 2020, using speech act theory and discourse analysis. The study aimed to compare the discursive strategies used , to discuss these in relation to their respective socio-political contexts, and to examine the application of speech act theory to political crisis management, which is currently underexplored. To achieve these objectives, the research used an eclectic combination of crisis communication theory and speech act theory, examining how speech acts were used in crisis ‘base response’ strategies, such as ‘instructing’ and ‘adjusting’ information. The study found some notable differences in the degree of assertiveness, hesitation, and sympathy, which relate to differences in the political ideology of each government. It also found some similarities, especially in inclusion techniques and using media briefings as a promotional tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2022.2040701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2022.2040701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文比较了澳大利亚、斐济和新西兰三国政府在新冠肺炎危机中的沟通情况。该研究利用言语行为理论和话语分析分析了各国领导人在2020年3月至6月期间发表的六次演讲。本研究旨在比较所使用的话语策略,讨论这些策略与各自的社会政治背景的关系,并研究言语行为理论在政治危机管理中的应用,这是目前尚未得到充分探索的。为了实现这些目标,该研究将危机沟通理论和言语行为理论折衷地结合起来,研究了言语行为如何在危机“基础反应”策略(如“指导”和“调整”信息)中使用。研究发现,在自信、犹豫和同情的程度上存在一些显著差异,这与两国政府政治意识形态的差异有关。它还发现了一些相似之处,特别是在包容技术和使用媒体简报作为宣传工具方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘We all have a role to play’: A comparative analysis of political speech acts on the COVID19 crisis in the South Pacific
ABSTRACT This article compares government communication on the COVID19 crisis in three countries: Australia, Fiji and New Zealand. It analyses six speeches made by each country’s leader , from March to June 2020, using speech act theory and discourse analysis. The study aimed to compare the discursive strategies used , to discuss these in relation to their respective socio-political contexts, and to examine the application of speech act theory to political crisis management, which is currently underexplored. To achieve these objectives, the research used an eclectic combination of crisis communication theory and speech act theory, examining how speech acts were used in crisis ‘base response’ strategies, such as ‘instructing’ and ‘adjusting’ information. The study found some notable differences in the degree of assertiveness, hesitation, and sympathy, which relate to differences in the political ideology of each government. It also found some similarities, especially in inclusion techniques and using media briefings as a promotional tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信