{"title":"儿童时期吮拇指或咬指甲会导致特应性过敏的减少,但不会导致哮喘或花粉热","authors":"F. Roked, J. North","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2016-311819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ed from: Lynch SJ, Sears MR, Hancox RJ. Thumb-sucking, nail-biting, and atopic sensitization, asthma, and hay fever. Pediatrics 2016;138:e20160443. The hygiene hypothesis (biome diversity, biome depletion) accounts for many but not all of the environmental and other epigenetic factors that determine the risk of developing allergy. This study shows that the seemingly innocuous acts of nail-biting and thumbsucking are likely to contribute to protection against later allergic disease and is supportive of a Swedish study of hand versus machine dish washing that showed decreased allergic disease when dishes were hand-washed. In addition to the suggestion that there is oral exposure to an increased range of pro-inflammatory agents, the tolerogenic nature of dendritic cells in the oral cavity could also be promoting specific tolerance to ingested allergens (used in sublingualspecific immunotherapy). The authors avoided investigating food allergy and this is probably wise as self-reporting of food allergy is unreliable and there is a higher rate of false positive skin tests to food allergens than aeroallergens. It would be intriguing to see if thumb-sucking could offset the increase in food allergy associated with probable cutaneous introduction of foods via damaged skin in eczema. Fozia Roked, Jonathan North Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK City Hospital, SWBH NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK Correspondence to Dr Fozia Roked, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK; fozia.roked@doctors.org.uk Contributors FR drafted the abstract/summary of original paper being picketed. JN drafted the commentary. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. REFERENCES 1 Hesselmar B, Hicke-Roberts A, Wennergren G. Allergy in children in hand versus machine dishwashing. Pediatrics 2015;135:e590–7. 2 Allam JP, Duan Y, Winter J, et al. Tolerogenic T cells, Th1/Th17 cytokines and TLR2/TLR4 expressing dendritic cells predominate the microenvironment within distinct oral mucosal sites. Allergy 2011;66:532–9. 3 Verrill L, Bruns R, Luccioli S, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Prevalence of self-reported food allergy in U.S. adults: 2001, 2006, and 2010. Allergy Asthma Proc 2015;36:458–67. Table 1 Prevalence of atopy at age 13 years according to oral habit History of oral habits (%) No history of oral habits (%) p Value Atopic sensitisation/positive skin prick test (n=328) 38 49 0.009 Asthma (n=95) 13.3 12.8 0.8 Hay fever (n=219) 29.6 29.9 0.9 Table 2 Atopic sensitisation and type of oral habit Outcomes Thumb-sucking or nail–biting, OR (95% CI) Thumb–sucking, OR (95% CI) Nail-biting, OR (95% CI) Atopic sensitisation/positive skin prick test at 13 years (n=724) 0.64 (0.45 to 0.90) 0.64 ( 0.42 to 0.97) 0.70 (0.47 to 1.10) Atopic sensitisation/positive skin prick test at 32 years (n=935) 0.62 (0.45 to 0.86) 0.69 (0.47 to 1.00) 0.71 (0.49 to 1.02)","PeriodicalId":8153,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition","volume":"11 1","pages":"167 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thumb-sucking or nail-biting in childhood led to a reduction in atopic sensitisation but not asthma or hay fever\",\"authors\":\"F. Roked, J. North\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2016-311819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ed from: Lynch SJ, Sears MR, Hancox RJ. Thumb-sucking, nail-biting, and atopic sensitization, asthma, and hay fever. Pediatrics 2016;138:e20160443. The hygiene hypothesis (biome diversity, biome depletion) accounts for many but not all of the environmental and other epigenetic factors that determine the risk of developing allergy. This study shows that the seemingly innocuous acts of nail-biting and thumbsucking are likely to contribute to protection against later allergic disease and is supportive of a Swedish study of hand versus machine dish washing that showed decreased allergic disease when dishes were hand-washed. In addition to the suggestion that there is oral exposure to an increased range of pro-inflammatory agents, the tolerogenic nature of dendritic cells in the oral cavity could also be promoting specific tolerance to ingested allergens (used in sublingualspecific immunotherapy). The authors avoided investigating food allergy and this is probably wise as self-reporting of food allergy is unreliable and there is a higher rate of false positive skin tests to food allergens than aeroallergens. It would be intriguing to see if thumb-sucking could offset the increase in food allergy associated with probable cutaneous introduction of foods via damaged skin in eczema. Fozia Roked, Jonathan North Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK City Hospital, SWBH NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK Correspondence to Dr Fozia Roked, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK; fozia.roked@doctors.org.uk Contributors FR drafted the abstract/summary of original paper being picketed. JN drafted the commentary. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. REFERENCES 1 Hesselmar B, Hicke-Roberts A, Wennergren G. Allergy in children in hand versus machine dishwashing. Pediatrics 2015;135:e590–7. 2 Allam JP, Duan Y, Winter J, et al. Tolerogenic T cells, Th1/Th17 cytokines and TLR2/TLR4 expressing dendritic cells predominate the microenvironment within distinct oral mucosal sites. Allergy 2011;66:532–9. 3 Verrill L, Bruns R, Luccioli S, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Prevalence of self-reported food allergy in U.S. adults: 2001, 2006, and 2010. Allergy Asthma Proc 2015;36:458–67. Table 1 Prevalence of atopy at age 13 years according to oral habit History of oral habits (%) No history of oral habits (%) p Value Atopic sensitisation/positive skin prick test (n=328) 38 49 0.009 Asthma (n=95) 13.3 12.8 0.8 Hay fever (n=219) 29.6 29.9 0.9 Table 2 Atopic sensitisation and type of oral habit Outcomes Thumb-sucking or nail–biting, OR (95% CI) Thumb–sucking, OR (95% CI) Nail-biting, OR (95% CI) Atopic sensitisation/positive skin prick test at 13 years (n=724) 0.64 (0.45 to 0.90) 0.64 ( 0.42 to 0.97) 0.70 (0.47 to 1.10) Atopic sensitisation/positive skin prick test at 32 years (n=935) 0.62 (0.45 to 0.86) 0.69 (0.47 to 1.00) 0.71 (0.49 to 1.02)\",\"PeriodicalId\":8153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"167 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
来自:Lynch SJ, Sears MR, Hancox RJ。吮拇指,咬指甲,过敏性过敏,哮喘和花粉热。儿科2016;138:e20160443。卫生假说(生物群落多样性,生物群落枯竭)解释了许多但不是全部的环境和其他表观遗传因素,这些因素决定了发生过敏的风险。这项研究表明,看似无害的咬指甲和吮吸拇指的行为可能有助于预防后来的过敏性疾病,并支持瑞典的一项关于手洗和机器洗碗的研究,该研究表明,手洗盘子可以减少过敏性疾病。口腔内树突状细胞的耐受性也可能促进对摄入的过敏原的特异性耐受性(用于舌下特异性免疫治疗)。作者避免调查食物过敏,这可能是明智的,因为食物过敏的自我报告是不可靠的,皮肤试验对食物过敏原的假阳性率高于空气过敏原。这将是一个有趣的研究,看看吸吮拇指是否可以抵消食物过敏的增加,这与湿疹患者可能通过皮肤损伤引入食物有关。Fozia Roked, Jonathan North Birmingham儿童医院,Birmingham, UK City Hospital, SWBH NHS Trust, Birmingham, UKfozia.roked@doctors.org.uk贡献者FR起草了被纠察的原始论文摘要。JN起草了评论。出处和同行评议未委托;内部同行评审。参考文献1 Hesselmar B, Hicke-Roberts A, Wennergren g。儿科2015;135:e590-7。[2]张建平,段勇,冬杰,等。耐受性T细胞、Th1/Th17细胞因子和表达TLR2/TLR4的树突状细胞在口腔粘膜不同部位的微环境中占主导地位。过敏2011;66:532-9。[3]李建军,李建军,李建军,美国食品药品监督管理局。2001年、2006年和2010年美国成年人自我报告的食物过敏患病率过敏性哮喘杂志,2015;36:458-67。表1根据口腔习惯的13岁特应性患病率口腔习惯史(%)无口腔习惯史(%)p值特应性致敏/皮肤点刺试验阳性(n=328) 38 49 0.009哮喘(n=95) 13.3 12.8 0.8花粉热(n=219) 29.6 29.9 0.9表2特应性致敏与口腔习惯类型结果吮指或咬指甲,or (95% CI)吮指,or (95% CI)咬指甲,OR (95% CI): 13岁时特应性致敏/皮肤点刺试验阳性(n=724) 0.64(0.45至0.90)0.64(0.42至0.97)0.70(0.47至1.10)32岁时特应性致敏/皮肤点刺试验阳性(n=935) 0.62(0.45至0.86)0.69(0.47至1.00)0.71(0.49至1.02)
Thumb-sucking or nail-biting in childhood led to a reduction in atopic sensitisation but not asthma or hay fever
ed from: Lynch SJ, Sears MR, Hancox RJ. Thumb-sucking, nail-biting, and atopic sensitization, asthma, and hay fever. Pediatrics 2016;138:e20160443. The hygiene hypothesis (biome diversity, biome depletion) accounts for many but not all of the environmental and other epigenetic factors that determine the risk of developing allergy. This study shows that the seemingly innocuous acts of nail-biting and thumbsucking are likely to contribute to protection against later allergic disease and is supportive of a Swedish study of hand versus machine dish washing that showed decreased allergic disease when dishes were hand-washed. In addition to the suggestion that there is oral exposure to an increased range of pro-inflammatory agents, the tolerogenic nature of dendritic cells in the oral cavity could also be promoting specific tolerance to ingested allergens (used in sublingualspecific immunotherapy). The authors avoided investigating food allergy and this is probably wise as self-reporting of food allergy is unreliable and there is a higher rate of false positive skin tests to food allergens than aeroallergens. It would be intriguing to see if thumb-sucking could offset the increase in food allergy associated with probable cutaneous introduction of foods via damaged skin in eczema. Fozia Roked, Jonathan North Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK City Hospital, SWBH NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK Correspondence to Dr Fozia Roked, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK; fozia.roked@doctors.org.uk Contributors FR drafted the abstract/summary of original paper being picketed. JN drafted the commentary. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. REFERENCES 1 Hesselmar B, Hicke-Roberts A, Wennergren G. Allergy in children in hand versus machine dishwashing. Pediatrics 2015;135:e590–7. 2 Allam JP, Duan Y, Winter J, et al. Tolerogenic T cells, Th1/Th17 cytokines and TLR2/TLR4 expressing dendritic cells predominate the microenvironment within distinct oral mucosal sites. Allergy 2011;66:532–9. 3 Verrill L, Bruns R, Luccioli S, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Prevalence of self-reported food allergy in U.S. adults: 2001, 2006, and 2010. Allergy Asthma Proc 2015;36:458–67. Table 1 Prevalence of atopy at age 13 years according to oral habit History of oral habits (%) No history of oral habits (%) p Value Atopic sensitisation/positive skin prick test (n=328) 38 49 0.009 Asthma (n=95) 13.3 12.8 0.8 Hay fever (n=219) 29.6 29.9 0.9 Table 2 Atopic sensitisation and type of oral habit Outcomes Thumb-sucking or nail–biting, OR (95% CI) Thumb–sucking, OR (95% CI) Nail-biting, OR (95% CI) Atopic sensitisation/positive skin prick test at 13 years (n=724) 0.64 (0.45 to 0.90) 0.64 ( 0.42 to 0.97) 0.70 (0.47 to 1.10) Atopic sensitisation/positive skin prick test at 32 years (n=935) 0.62 (0.45 to 0.86) 0.69 (0.47 to 1.00) 0.71 (0.49 to 1.02)