Xiaoxv Yang, Hui Liu, Shifan Chen, P. Dong, Di Zhao
{"title":"血管内肾去神经可降低原发性高血压患者的门诊和办公室血压:一项随机假对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Xiaoxv Yang, Hui Liu, Shifan Chen, P. Dong, Di Zhao","doi":"10.1159/000524171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of intravascular renal denervation (RDN) in patients with essential hypertension, especially to determine the magnitude of blood pressure (BP) reduction with RDN therapy using second-generation catheters. Methods: PubMed was searched to identify randomized sham-controlled trials from inception through August 2021. The endpoints were changes in 24-h ambulatory BP or office BP. This meta-analysis was performed by calculating the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model when the I2 index was <50%. A fixed-effects model was used when the I2 index was ≥50%. Results: A total of 1,297 patients were included in 8 randomized, sham-controlled trials in this meta-analysis. Intravascular RDN reduced 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) −3.02 (WMD, 95% CI: −4.95, −1.10, p < 0.01) and diastolic BP (DBP) −1.66 (WMD, 95% CI: −2.44, −0.88, p < 0.001) mm Hg, respectively. In the studies using first-generation catheters, the WMDs of 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP changes between intravascular RDN and sham control were −2.67 (95% CI: −5.08, −0.27; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%, p = 0.53) and −0.82 (95% CI: −2.19, 0.56; p > 0.05; I2 = 0%, p = 0.64) mm Hg. In the studies using second-generation catheters, the WMDs of 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP changes between intravascular RDN and sham control were −3.14 (95% CI: −5.94, −0.33, p < 0.05; I2 = 71%, p = 0.008) and −2.06 (95% CI: −3.02, −1.11, p < 0.001; I2 = 50%, p = 0.09) mm Hg. Intravascular RDN using second-generation catheters reduced office SBP −6.30 (WMD, 95% CI: −7.67, −4.93, p < 0.001; I2 = 43%, p = 0.14) and DBP −3.88 (WMD, 95% CI: −4.44, −3.33, p < 0.001; I2 = 42%, p = 0.14) mm Hg, respectively. Conclusions: Intravascular RDN using second-generation catheters reduces ambulatory and office BP in patients with essential hypertension. The selection of appropriate hypertensive patients may be the major challenge for the performance of intravascular RDN in routine clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":17810,"journal":{"name":"Kidney and Blood Pressure Research","volume":"31 1","pages":"363 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravascular Renal Denervation Reduces Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressure in Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxv Yang, Hui Liu, Shifan Chen, P. Dong, Di Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000524171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of intravascular renal denervation (RDN) in patients with essential hypertension, especially to determine the magnitude of blood pressure (BP) reduction with RDN therapy using second-generation catheters. Methods: PubMed was searched to identify randomized sham-controlled trials from inception through August 2021. The endpoints were changes in 24-h ambulatory BP or office BP. This meta-analysis was performed by calculating the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model when the I2 index was <50%. A fixed-effects model was used when the I2 index was ≥50%. Results: A total of 1,297 patients were included in 8 randomized, sham-controlled trials in this meta-analysis. Intravascular RDN reduced 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) −3.02 (WMD, 95% CI: −4.95, −1.10, p < 0.01) and diastolic BP (DBP) −1.66 (WMD, 95% CI: −2.44, −0.88, p < 0.001) mm Hg, respectively. In the studies using first-generation catheters, the WMDs of 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP changes between intravascular RDN and sham control were −2.67 (95% CI: −5.08, −0.27; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%, p = 0.53) and −0.82 (95% CI: −2.19, 0.56; p > 0.05; I2 = 0%, p = 0.64) mm Hg. In the studies using second-generation catheters, the WMDs of 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP changes between intravascular RDN and sham control were −3.14 (95% CI: −5.94, −0.33, p < 0.05; I2 = 71%, p = 0.008) and −2.06 (95% CI: −3.02, −1.11, p < 0.001; I2 = 50%, p = 0.09) mm Hg. Intravascular RDN using second-generation catheters reduced office SBP −6.30 (WMD, 95% CI: −7.67, −4.93, p < 0.001; I2 = 43%, p = 0.14) and DBP −3.88 (WMD, 95% CI: −4.44, −3.33, p < 0.001; I2 = 42%, p = 0.14) mm Hg, respectively. Conclusions: Intravascular RDN using second-generation catheters reduces ambulatory and office BP in patients with essential hypertension. The selection of appropriate hypertensive patients may be the major challenge for the performance of intravascular RDN in routine clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney and Blood Pressure Research\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"363 - 374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney and Blood Pressure Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000524171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney and Blood Pressure Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000524171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:本荟萃分析旨在评估原发性高血压患者血管内肾去神经支配(RDN)的降压效果,特别是确定使用第二代导管进行RDN治疗的血压(BP)降低幅度。方法:检索PubMed以确定从开始到2021年8月的随机假对照试验。终点是24小时动态血压或办公室血压的变化。当I2指数为0.05时,采用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(CI)的加权平均差(WMD)进行meta分析;I2 = 0%, p = 0.64) mm Hg。在使用第二代导管的研究中,血管内RDN和假对照组24小时动态收缩压和舒张压变化的wmd为- 3.14 (95% CI: - 5.94, - 0.33, p < 0.05;I2 = 71%, p = 0.008)和−2.06(95%置信区间CI: 3.02−−1.11,p < 0.001;I2 = 50%, p = 0.09) mm Hg。血管内RDN使用第二代导管降低办公室收缩压- 6.30 (WMD, 95% CI: - 7.67, - 4.93, p < 0.001;I2 = 43%, p = 0.14)和DBP - 3.88 (WMD, 95% CI: - 4.44, - 3.33, p < 0.001;I2 = 42%, p = 0.14) mm Hg。结论:血管内RDN使用第二代导管可降低原发性高血压患者的动态血压和办公室血压。选择合适的高血压患者可能是常规临床实践中血管内RDN性能的主要挑战。
Intravascular Renal Denervation Reduces Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressure in Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials
Background: This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of intravascular renal denervation (RDN) in patients with essential hypertension, especially to determine the magnitude of blood pressure (BP) reduction with RDN therapy using second-generation catheters. Methods: PubMed was searched to identify randomized sham-controlled trials from inception through August 2021. The endpoints were changes in 24-h ambulatory BP or office BP. This meta-analysis was performed by calculating the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model when the I2 index was <50%. A fixed-effects model was used when the I2 index was ≥50%. Results: A total of 1,297 patients were included in 8 randomized, sham-controlled trials in this meta-analysis. Intravascular RDN reduced 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) −3.02 (WMD, 95% CI: −4.95, −1.10, p < 0.01) and diastolic BP (DBP) −1.66 (WMD, 95% CI: −2.44, −0.88, p < 0.001) mm Hg, respectively. In the studies using first-generation catheters, the WMDs of 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP changes between intravascular RDN and sham control were −2.67 (95% CI: −5.08, −0.27; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%, p = 0.53) and −0.82 (95% CI: −2.19, 0.56; p > 0.05; I2 = 0%, p = 0.64) mm Hg. In the studies using second-generation catheters, the WMDs of 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP changes between intravascular RDN and sham control were −3.14 (95% CI: −5.94, −0.33, p < 0.05; I2 = 71%, p = 0.008) and −2.06 (95% CI: −3.02, −1.11, p < 0.001; I2 = 50%, p = 0.09) mm Hg. Intravascular RDN using second-generation catheters reduced office SBP −6.30 (WMD, 95% CI: −7.67, −4.93, p < 0.001; I2 = 43%, p = 0.14) and DBP −3.88 (WMD, 95% CI: −4.44, −3.33, p < 0.001; I2 = 42%, p = 0.14) mm Hg, respectively. Conclusions: Intravascular RDN using second-generation catheters reduces ambulatory and office BP in patients with essential hypertension. The selection of appropriate hypertensive patients may be the major challenge for the performance of intravascular RDN in routine clinical practice.