心肌灌注门控spect对缺血性左心室功能障碍患者冠脉造影决定的影响

G. Romero-Farina , J. Candell-Riera , S. Aguadé-Bruix , J. Castell-Conesa , D. García-Dorado
{"title":"心肌灌注门控spect对缺血性左心室功能障碍患者冠脉造影决定的影响","authors":"G. Romero-Farina ,&nbsp;J. Candell-Riera ,&nbsp;S. Aguadé-Bruix ,&nbsp;J. Castell-Conesa ,&nbsp;D. García-Dorado","doi":"10.1016/S1578-200X(11)70019-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to analyze how the myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography) influences the practice of a coronary angiography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (IM).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>A total of 120 consecutive patients (mean age: 64.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.5 years, 25 female) with IM (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) and without previous coronary angiography were evaluated by myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT (96 stress-rest and 24 only at rest). The ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was obtained at rest by gated-SPECT in all patients. The ischemic origin of the systolic dysfunction was established by means of coronary angiography in 64 patients and by previous myocardial infarction in the rest. Gated-SPECT results of these 64 patients were compared with those of 56 patients in whom coronary angiography had not been indicated.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Scintigraphic myocardial ischemia (HR: 5.2; CI 95%: 2.68 to 10.35) in patients who were able to perform the stress-rest test) and who had severely impaired EF (&lt;30%) (HR: 0.9; CI 95%: 0.89 to 0.99) were the best independent predictors of coronary angiography. On the contrary, scintigraphic criteria of viability were not a determinant, from the statistical point of view, of coronary angiography in this series.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with IM, demonstration of ischemia and severe reduction of the EF, but not detection of viable myocardium, prompted the performance of coronary angiography.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101111,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1578-200X(11)70019-5","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT on the decision to perform coronary angiography in patients with left ventricular dysfunction of ischemic origin\",\"authors\":\"G. Romero-Farina ,&nbsp;J. Candell-Riera ,&nbsp;S. Aguadé-Bruix ,&nbsp;J. Castell-Conesa ,&nbsp;D. García-Dorado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1578-200X(11)70019-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to analyze how the myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography) influences the practice of a coronary angiography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (IM).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>A total of 120 consecutive patients (mean age: 64.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.5 years, 25 female) with IM (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) and without previous coronary angiography were evaluated by myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT (96 stress-rest and 24 only at rest). The ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was obtained at rest by gated-SPECT in all patients. The ischemic origin of the systolic dysfunction was established by means of coronary angiography in 64 patients and by previous myocardial infarction in the rest. Gated-SPECT results of these 64 patients were compared with those of 56 patients in whom coronary angiography had not been indicated.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Scintigraphic myocardial ischemia (HR: 5.2; CI 95%: 2.68 to 10.35) in patients who were able to perform the stress-rest test) and who had severely impaired EF (&lt;30%) (HR: 0.9; CI 95%: 0.89 to 0.99) were the best independent predictors of coronary angiography. On the contrary, scintigraphic criteria of viability were not a determinant, from the statistical point of view, of coronary angiography in this series.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with IM, demonstration of ischemia and severe reduction of the EF, but not detection of viable myocardium, prompted the performance of coronary angiography.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1578-200X(11)70019-5\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1578200X11700195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1578200X11700195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的分析心肌灌注门控spect(单光子发射计算机断层扫描)对缺血性心肌病(IM)患者冠状动脉造影的影响。患者和方法对连续120例(平均年龄:64.9±11.5岁,女性25例)无冠状动脉造影的IM(左室射血分数≤40%)患者进行心肌灌注门控spect评价(应激休息96例,静止24例)。所有患者静息时均采用门控spect检测心室射血分数(EF)。通过64例患者的冠状动脉造影和其余患者的既往心肌梗死,确定了收缩功能障碍的缺血性起源。将这64例患者的门控spect结果与56例未行冠状动脉造影的患者进行比较。结果显像心肌缺血(HR: 5.2;CI 95%: 2.68 ~ 10.35),能够进行压力休息测试的患者和EF严重受损的患者(<30%) (HR: 0.9;CI 95%: 0.89 ~ 0.99)是冠状动脉造影的最佳独立预测因子。相反,从统计学的角度来看,在这个系列中,生存能力的星形图标准不是决定因素。结论IM患者表现为心肌缺血和EF严重降低,但未检出存活心肌,提示冠脉造影表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT on the decision to perform coronary angiography in patients with left ventricular dysfunction of ischemic origin

Objectives

The aim of this study was to analyze how the myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography) influences the practice of a coronary angiography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (IM).

Patients and methods

A total of 120 consecutive patients (mean age: 64.9 ± 11.5 years, 25 female) with IM (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) and without previous coronary angiography were evaluated by myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT (96 stress-rest and 24 only at rest). The ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was obtained at rest by gated-SPECT in all patients. The ischemic origin of the systolic dysfunction was established by means of coronary angiography in 64 patients and by previous myocardial infarction in the rest. Gated-SPECT results of these 64 patients were compared with those of 56 patients in whom coronary angiography had not been indicated.

Result

Scintigraphic myocardial ischemia (HR: 5.2; CI 95%: 2.68 to 10.35) in patients who were able to perform the stress-rest test) and who had severely impaired EF (<30%) (HR: 0.9; CI 95%: 0.89 to 0.99) were the best independent predictors of coronary angiography. On the contrary, scintigraphic criteria of viability were not a determinant, from the statistical point of view, of coronary angiography in this series.

Conclusions

In patients with IM, demonstration of ischemia and severe reduction of the EF, but not detection of viable myocardium, prompted the performance of coronary angiography.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信