罗马帝国的宗教全景

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES

Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.35253//JAEMA.2020.1.1

Maria Dzielska

{"title":"罗马帝国的宗教全景","authors":"Maria Dzielska","doi":"10.35253//JAEMA.2020.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While traditional Roman religion was more about orthopraxy than orthodoxy, the emergence of Christianity challenged non-Christian intellectuals of the later empire to respond to issues of personal devotion to the gods and the role of theurgy as well as divine unity. This is exemplified in this paper through an examination of Aelius Aristides, Marcus Aurelius, Apollonius of Tyana, Saturninius Secundus Sallustius, Iamblichus, and Proclus. Not only was their thought a reaction to Christianity but also influenced its development.","PeriodicalId":38059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The religious panorama of the Roman Empire\",\"authors\":\"Maria Dzielska\",\"doi\":\"10.35253//JAEMA.2020.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While traditional Roman religion was more about orthopraxy than orthodoxy, the emergence of Christianity challenged non-Christian intellectuals of the later empire to respond to issues of personal devotion to the gods and the role of theurgy as well as divine unity. This is exemplified in this paper through an examination of Aelius Aristides, Marcus Aurelius, Apollonius of Tyana, Saturninius Secundus Sallustius, Iamblichus, and Proclus. Not only was their thought a reaction to Christianity but also influenced its development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35253//JAEMA.2020.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35253//JAEMA.2020.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然传统的罗马宗教更多的是关于正正统而不是正统，但基督教的出现挑战了后来帝国的非基督教知识分子，他们对个人对神的忠诚、神学的作用以及神的统一等问题做出了回应。本文通过对阿利乌斯·阿里斯蒂德、马库斯·奥勒留、提亚那的阿波罗尼乌斯、萨图尼乌斯·塞昆德斯·萨勒斯提乌斯、伊姆布利克斯和普罗克劳斯的考察来举例说明这一点。他们的思想不仅是对基督教的反应，而且影响了基督教的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The religious panorama of the Roman Empire

While traditional Roman religion was more about orthopraxy than orthodoxy, the emergence of Christianity challenged non-Christian intellectuals of the later empire to respond to issues of personal devotion to the gods and the role of theurgy as well as divine unity. This is exemplified in this paper through an examination of Aelius Aristides, Marcus Aurelius, Apollonius of Tyana, Saturninius Secundus Sallustius, Iamblichus, and Proclus. Not only was their thought a reaction to Christianity but also influenced its development.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association Arts and Humanities-History

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量