Vinod Priyadarshi, M. Singh, Vijoy Kumar, R. Tiwari, S. Gupta, N. Sehgal
{"title":"超声尿道造影在评估前尿道狭窄中的作用:与逆行尿道造影的相关性","authors":"Vinod Priyadarshi, M. Singh, Vijoy Kumar, R. Tiwari, S. Gupta, N. Sehgal","doi":"10.3834/UIJ.1944-5784.2012.10.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Retrograde urethrography (RGU) is the most commonly used imaging modality for the evaluation of the anterior urethra. Sonourethrography (SUG) is another modality that is not so frequently used, though several studies have suggested its higher degree of sensitivity and specificity in anterior urethral stricture evaluation. The present prospective study has been done to compare the results of SUG with that of RGU and to probe its effect in decision making. Patients and Methods: A total of 50 patients with anterior urethral stricture disease were evaluated with both SUG and RGU for stricture length, site location, and associated urethral pathologies. Collected information was used as a guide for the choice of surgery, and it was compared with operative findings. Results: The mean lengths of strictures on SUG, RGU, and surgery were 20.46 cm, 17.14 cm, and 20.35 cm, respectively. Overall sensitivity and accuracy of SUG in predicting correct stricture length was 95.55 and 97.33%, respectively, and overall sensitivity and accuracy of RGU in predicting correct stricture length was 77.22 and 85.33%, respectively. Spongiofibrosis was noted only with SUG in 78 to 88% accuracy. In 32% of cases, the surgical plan changed when SUG results were taken into consideration along with RGU. Conclusion: SUG is more accurate in measuring stricture length, especially that of the bulbar urethra. It simultaneously provides a better assessment of a diseased urethra. It should be used as an extension of the physical examination by the treating urologist as it helps in better preoperative surgical planning of anterior urethral strictures.","PeriodicalId":23406,"journal":{"name":"Urotoday International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Sonourethrography In the Evaluation of Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Correlation with Retrograde Urethrography\",\"authors\":\"Vinod Priyadarshi, M. Singh, Vijoy Kumar, R. Tiwari, S. Gupta, N. Sehgal\",\"doi\":\"10.3834/UIJ.1944-5784.2012.10.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Retrograde urethrography (RGU) is the most commonly used imaging modality for the evaluation of the anterior urethra. Sonourethrography (SUG) is another modality that is not so frequently used, though several studies have suggested its higher degree of sensitivity and specificity in anterior urethral stricture evaluation. The present prospective study has been done to compare the results of SUG with that of RGU and to probe its effect in decision making. Patients and Methods: A total of 50 patients with anterior urethral stricture disease were evaluated with both SUG and RGU for stricture length, site location, and associated urethral pathologies. Collected information was used as a guide for the choice of surgery, and it was compared with operative findings. Results: The mean lengths of strictures on SUG, RGU, and surgery were 20.46 cm, 17.14 cm, and 20.35 cm, respectively. Overall sensitivity and accuracy of SUG in predicting correct stricture length was 95.55 and 97.33%, respectively, and overall sensitivity and accuracy of RGU in predicting correct stricture length was 77.22 and 85.33%, respectively. Spongiofibrosis was noted only with SUG in 78 to 88% accuracy. In 32% of cases, the surgical plan changed when SUG results were taken into consideration along with RGU. Conclusion: SUG is more accurate in measuring stricture length, especially that of the bulbar urethra. It simultaneously provides a better assessment of a diseased urethra. It should be used as an extension of the physical examination by the treating urologist as it helps in better preoperative surgical planning of anterior urethral strictures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urotoday International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urotoday International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3834/UIJ.1944-5784.2012.10.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urotoday International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3834/UIJ.1944-5784.2012.10.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
目的:逆行尿道造影(RGU)是评估前尿道最常用的成像方式。超声尿道造影(SUG)是另一种不常使用的方式,尽管一些研究表明其在前尿道狭窄评估中具有更高的敏感性和特异性。本前瞻性研究比较了SUG和RGU的结果,并探讨了其在决策中的作用。患者和方法:对50例前尿道狭窄疾病患者进行SUG和RGU评估狭窄长度、部位位置和相关尿道病理。收集的信息作为手术选择的指导,并与手术结果进行比较。结果:大网膜下腔静脉狭窄平均长度为20.46 cm, RGU狭窄平均长度为17.14 cm,手术狭窄平均长度为20.35 cm。SUG预测正确狭窄长度的总灵敏度和准确度分别为95.55和97.33%,RGU预测正确狭窄长度的总灵敏度和准确度分别为77.22和85.33%。仅用SUG诊断海绵状纤维化的准确率为78%至88%。在32%的病例中,当考虑到SUG结果和RGU时,手术计划改变。结论:SUG测量尿道狭窄长度较准确,尤其是球尿道狭窄长度。它同时提供了一个更好的评估病变尿道。它应该作为治疗泌尿科医生体格检查的延伸,因为它有助于更好的前尿道狭窄术前手术计划。
The Role of Sonourethrography In the Evaluation of Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Correlation with Retrograde Urethrography
Objective: Retrograde urethrography (RGU) is the most commonly used imaging modality for the evaluation of the anterior urethra. Sonourethrography (SUG) is another modality that is not so frequently used, though several studies have suggested its higher degree of sensitivity and specificity in anterior urethral stricture evaluation. The present prospective study has been done to compare the results of SUG with that of RGU and to probe its effect in decision making. Patients and Methods: A total of 50 patients with anterior urethral stricture disease were evaluated with both SUG and RGU for stricture length, site location, and associated urethral pathologies. Collected information was used as a guide for the choice of surgery, and it was compared with operative findings. Results: The mean lengths of strictures on SUG, RGU, and surgery were 20.46 cm, 17.14 cm, and 20.35 cm, respectively. Overall sensitivity and accuracy of SUG in predicting correct stricture length was 95.55 and 97.33%, respectively, and overall sensitivity and accuracy of RGU in predicting correct stricture length was 77.22 and 85.33%, respectively. Spongiofibrosis was noted only with SUG in 78 to 88% accuracy. In 32% of cases, the surgical plan changed when SUG results were taken into consideration along with RGU. Conclusion: SUG is more accurate in measuring stricture length, especially that of the bulbar urethra. It simultaneously provides a better assessment of a diseased urethra. It should be used as an extension of the physical examination by the treating urologist as it helps in better preoperative surgical planning of anterior urethral strictures.