WE6.2术前调查的真实成本

F. Dholoo, A. Shabana, Abigail Burrows, Jonathon Horsnell
{"title":"WE6.2术前调查的真实成本","authors":"F. Dholoo, A. Shabana, Abigail Burrows, Jonathon Horsnell","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac248.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Pre-Operative Assessment (POA) is an integral part of surgery. It is essential for pre-operative investigations including bloods and COVID-19 swabbing. There was concern within the Breast-Unit that patients may be having unnecessary blood-tests as part of their POA. This was likely due to POA not having one unified resource to refer to. Guidance suggests POA uses the patient's American Association of Anaesthesiologist's (ASA) grade, type of surgery they are undergoing and additional conditions for determining pre-operative investigations. Methods This QIP consisted of 2 cycles. During cycle-1 data was audited against national guidance to see which blood tests were performed unnecessarily. After developing a universal-guidance poster and teaching sessions, a second cycle was performed. Cycle-2 assessed whether there was a reduction in unnecessary blood tests being performed. Results During cycle-1, 216 pre-operative blood tests were undertaken. Of these only 99 were required. Therefore 54% of the tests were unnecessary. This equates to £690.77 over 2-months and if extrapolated £4144.62 spent, unnecessarily per-year. This represents a significant cost to the trust and puts needless pressure onto the laboratory. During cycle-2, after our intervention, there were 57 fewer tests and 40 fewer, incorrect blood tests. Our intervention therefore resulted in a £183.46 saving, which over a year equates to £1110.76 saved. Conclusion The potential benefits of improving POA include financial savings, patient autonomy, increased appointment availability and reduced pressure on the laboratory. In these unprecedented times, trying to tackle the COVID-19 backlog; we advise all departments to ensure that clear guidance exists.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WE6.2 The true cost of pre-operative investigations\",\"authors\":\"F. Dholoo, A. Shabana, Abigail Burrows, Jonathon Horsnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjs/znac248.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction Pre-Operative Assessment (POA) is an integral part of surgery. It is essential for pre-operative investigations including bloods and COVID-19 swabbing. There was concern within the Breast-Unit that patients may be having unnecessary blood-tests as part of their POA. This was likely due to POA not having one unified resource to refer to. Guidance suggests POA uses the patient's American Association of Anaesthesiologist's (ASA) grade, type of surgery they are undergoing and additional conditions for determining pre-operative investigations. Methods This QIP consisted of 2 cycles. During cycle-1 data was audited against national guidance to see which blood tests were performed unnecessarily. After developing a universal-guidance poster and teaching sessions, a second cycle was performed. Cycle-2 assessed whether there was a reduction in unnecessary blood tests being performed. Results During cycle-1, 216 pre-operative blood tests were undertaken. Of these only 99 were required. Therefore 54% of the tests were unnecessary. This equates to £690.77 over 2-months and if extrapolated £4144.62 spent, unnecessarily per-year. This represents a significant cost to the trust and puts needless pressure onto the laboratory. During cycle-2, after our intervention, there were 57 fewer tests and 40 fewer, incorrect blood tests. Our intervention therefore resulted in a £183.46 saving, which over a year equates to £1110.76 saved. Conclusion The potential benefits of improving POA include financial savings, patient autonomy, increased appointment availability and reduced pressure on the laboratory. In these unprecedented times, trying to tackle the COVID-19 backlog; we advise all departments to ensure that clear guidance exists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of oral surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of oral surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac248.145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of oral surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac248.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术前评估(pre - op Assessment, POA)是外科手术的重要组成部分。这对于包括血液和COVID-19拭子在内的术前调查至关重要。乳房科担心,作为POA的一部分,患者可能会进行不必要的血液检查。这可能是由于POA没有一个统一的资源可以参考。指南建议POA使用患者的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级,他们正在进行的手术类型和其他条件来确定术前调查。方法该QIP为2个周期。在周期1期间,根据国家指南审核了数据,以确定哪些血液检查是不必要的。在制定了通用指导海报和教学会议之后,进行了第二轮活动。第2周期评估是否减少了进行不必要的血液检查。结果第1周期共进行术前血液检查216例。其中只有99个是必需的。因此,54%的测试是不必要的。这相当于在两个月内花费690.77英镑,如果以此类推,每年不必要的花费为4144.62英镑。这代表了信任的重大成本,并给实验室带来了不必要的压力。在第二个周期,经过我们的干预,测试减少了57次,错误的血液测试减少了40次。因此,我们的干预导致节省了183.46英镑,一年下来相当于节省了1110.76英镑。结论改进POA的潜在好处包括节省资金、患者自主权、增加预约和减轻实验室压力。在这个前所未有的时期,努力解决COVID-19积压;我们建议所有部门确保有明确的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WE6.2 The true cost of pre-operative investigations
Abstract Introduction Pre-Operative Assessment (POA) is an integral part of surgery. It is essential for pre-operative investigations including bloods and COVID-19 swabbing. There was concern within the Breast-Unit that patients may be having unnecessary blood-tests as part of their POA. This was likely due to POA not having one unified resource to refer to. Guidance suggests POA uses the patient's American Association of Anaesthesiologist's (ASA) grade, type of surgery they are undergoing and additional conditions for determining pre-operative investigations. Methods This QIP consisted of 2 cycles. During cycle-1 data was audited against national guidance to see which blood tests were performed unnecessarily. After developing a universal-guidance poster and teaching sessions, a second cycle was performed. Cycle-2 assessed whether there was a reduction in unnecessary blood tests being performed. Results During cycle-1, 216 pre-operative blood tests were undertaken. Of these only 99 were required. Therefore 54% of the tests were unnecessary. This equates to £690.77 over 2-months and if extrapolated £4144.62 spent, unnecessarily per-year. This represents a significant cost to the trust and puts needless pressure onto the laboratory. During cycle-2, after our intervention, there were 57 fewer tests and 40 fewer, incorrect blood tests. Our intervention therefore resulted in a £183.46 saving, which over a year equates to £1110.76 saved. Conclusion The potential benefits of improving POA include financial savings, patient autonomy, increased appointment availability and reduced pressure on the laboratory. In these unprecedented times, trying to tackle the COVID-19 backlog; we advise all departments to ensure that clear guidance exists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信