一个简单的局部自旋群互斥算法

P. Keane, Mark Moir
{"title":"一个简单的局部自旋群互斥算法","authors":"P. Keane, Mark Moir","doi":"10.1145/301308.301319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a new solution to the group mutual exclusion problem recently posed by Joung. In this problem, processes repeatedly request access to various \"sessions.\" It is required that distinct processes are not in different sessions concurrently, that multiple processes may be in the same session concurrently, and that each process that tries to enter a session is eventually able to do so. This problem is a generalization of the mutual exclusion and readers-writers problems. Our algorithm and its correctness proof are substantially simpler than Joung's. This simplicity is achieved by building upon known solutions to the more specific mutual exclusion problem. Our algorithm also has various advantages over Joung's, depending on the choice of mutual exclusion algorithm used. These advantages include admitting a process to its session in constant time in the absence of contention, spinning locally in Cache Coherent (CC) and Nonuniform Memory Access (NUMA) systems, and improvements in the complexity measures proposed by Joung.","PeriodicalId":13128,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.","volume":"24 1","pages":"673-685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"88","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simple local-spin group mutual exclusion algorithm\",\"authors\":\"P. Keane, Mark Moir\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/301308.301319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a new solution to the group mutual exclusion problem recently posed by Joung. In this problem, processes repeatedly request access to various \\\"sessions.\\\" It is required that distinct processes are not in different sessions concurrently, that multiple processes may be in the same session concurrently, and that each process that tries to enter a session is eventually able to do so. This problem is a generalization of the mutual exclusion and readers-writers problems. Our algorithm and its correctness proof are substantially simpler than Joung's. This simplicity is achieved by building upon known solutions to the more specific mutual exclusion problem. Our algorithm also has various advantages over Joung's, depending on the choice of mutual exclusion algorithm used. These advantages include admitting a process to its session in constant time in the absence of contention, spinning locally in Cache Coherent (CC) and Nonuniform Memory Access (NUMA) systems, and improvements in the complexity measures proposed by Joung.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"673-685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"88\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/301308.301319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/301308.301319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

摘要

本文提出了一种新的解决young最近提出的群体互斥问题的方法。在这个问题中,进程反复请求访问各种“会话”。要求不同的进程不能并发地在不同的会话中,多个进程可以并发地在同一个会话中,并且每个尝试进入会话的进程最终都能够这样做。这个问题是互斥问题和读者-作者问题的概括。我们的算法及其正确性证明比杨格的算法简单得多。这种简单性是通过构建更具体的互斥问题的已知解决方案来实现的。根据所使用的互斥算法的选择,我们的算法也比young的算法有很多优点。这些优点包括在没有争用的情况下,允许进程在恒定时间内进入其会话,在Cache Coherent (CC)和Nonuniform Memory Access (NUMA)系统中进行本地旋转,以及在Joung提出的复杂性度量方面的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A simple local-spin group mutual exclusion algorithm
This paper presents a new solution to the group mutual exclusion problem recently posed by Joung. In this problem, processes repeatedly request access to various "sessions." It is required that distinct processes are not in different sessions concurrently, that multiple processes may be in the same session concurrently, and that each process that tries to enter a session is eventually able to do so. This problem is a generalization of the mutual exclusion and readers-writers problems. Our algorithm and its correctness proof are substantially simpler than Joung's. This simplicity is achieved by building upon known solutions to the more specific mutual exclusion problem. Our algorithm also has various advantages over Joung's, depending on the choice of mutual exclusion algorithm used. These advantages include admitting a process to its session in constant time in the absence of contention, spinning locally in Cache Coherent (CC) and Nonuniform Memory Access (NUMA) systems, and improvements in the complexity measures proposed by Joung.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信