{"title":"对人的看法:人格主义、神经科学和现在","authors":"J. Beauregard","doi":"10.1080/2153599x.2022.2050789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robert McNamara has made a highly interesting contribution in Religion, Neuroscience, and the Self . He attempts to bring together, and to bring into dialogue personalist thought, religion, and neuroscience for the development of neuroscience-informed personalism directed toward the human future. In this brief response to McNamara, I will focus primarily on the ethical implications he has articulated for his new personalism.","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":"4 1","pages":"445 - 448"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The view toward persons: personalism, neuroscience, and the present\",\"authors\":\"J. Beauregard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2153599x.2022.2050789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robert McNamara has made a highly interesting contribution in Religion, Neuroscience, and the Self . He attempts to bring together, and to bring into dialogue personalist thought, religion, and neuroscience for the development of neuroscience-informed personalism directed toward the human future. In this brief response to McNamara, I will focus primarily on the ethical implications he has articulated for his new personalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion Brain & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"445 - 448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion Brain & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599x.2022.2050789\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion Brain & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599x.2022.2050789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The view toward persons: personalism, neuroscience, and the present
Robert McNamara has made a highly interesting contribution in Religion, Neuroscience, and the Self . He attempts to bring together, and to bring into dialogue personalist thought, religion, and neuroscience for the development of neuroscience-informed personalism directed toward the human future. In this brief response to McNamara, I will focus primarily on the ethical implications he has articulated for his new personalism.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
