头孢德罗col和头孢洛赞-他唑巴坦对广谱产β-内酰胺酶大肠菌群及多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的体外活性评价

Eman M. Hegazy, S. Zahra, Sarah M. Shoeib, M. Taha
{"title":"头孢德罗col和头孢洛赞-他唑巴坦对广谱产β-内酰胺酶大肠菌群及多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的体外活性评价","authors":"Eman M. Hegazy, S. Zahra, Sarah M. Shoeib, M. Taha","doi":"10.21608/ejmm.2022.262698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A worrisome escalation in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections which are accompanied with worse outcomes due to inadequate treatment options. There is an imperative requirement to explore new antimicrobials to oppose these resistant strains. Objectives: Assessment of antibacterial activity of Cefiderocol and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against ESBL–Producing coliform and MDR A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. Methodology: A total of 332 clinical samples were obtained from surgical ICU cases. Pathogenic microorganisms were identified. Antibiotic susceptibility was done for gram negative isolates. Third-generation cephalosporins resistant coliforms were screened for ESBL detection. Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Cefiderocol activity on ESBL coliform and MDR P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates was investigated. Results: The susceptibility of both ESBL E. coli, K. pneumoniae, MDR P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii to ceftolozane/tazobactam was 77%, 70% ,63% and 58% respectively. ESBL E. coli and K. pneumonaie exhibited MIC 50/90 value of (0.19/0.25μg/mL) and (0.25/0.5μg/mL) for ceftolozane/tazobactam respectively. MDR P. aeruginosa showed MIC 50/90 value (2/4μg/mL). MDR A. baumannii exhibited high MIC 50/90 value (16/24μg/mL). Cefiderocol was 100% effective against most isolates with different MIC 50/90 values. For ESBL-E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the MIC 50/90 value was (0.5/1.5μg/mL). For MDR P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, the MIC 50/90 value was (0.75/2μg/mL) and (0.25/2μg/mL) respectively. Conclusion: Cefiderocol exhibits superior activity against ESBL coliform and MDR A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa compared to ceftolozane-Tazobactam.","PeriodicalId":22549,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase–Producing Coliform and Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa\",\"authors\":\"Eman M. Hegazy, S. Zahra, Sarah M. Shoeib, M. Taha\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejmm.2022.262698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A worrisome escalation in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections which are accompanied with worse outcomes due to inadequate treatment options. There is an imperative requirement to explore new antimicrobials to oppose these resistant strains. Objectives: Assessment of antibacterial activity of Cefiderocol and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against ESBL–Producing coliform and MDR A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. Methodology: A total of 332 clinical samples were obtained from surgical ICU cases. Pathogenic microorganisms were identified. Antibiotic susceptibility was done for gram negative isolates. Third-generation cephalosporins resistant coliforms were screened for ESBL detection. Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Cefiderocol activity on ESBL coliform and MDR P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates was investigated. Results: The susceptibility of both ESBL E. coli, K. pneumoniae, MDR P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii to ceftolozane/tazobactam was 77%, 70% ,63% and 58% respectively. ESBL E. coli and K. pneumonaie exhibited MIC 50/90 value of (0.19/0.25μg/mL) and (0.25/0.5μg/mL) for ceftolozane/tazobactam respectively. MDR P. aeruginosa showed MIC 50/90 value (2/4μg/mL). MDR A. baumannii exhibited high MIC 50/90 value (16/24μg/mL). Cefiderocol was 100% effective against most isolates with different MIC 50/90 values. For ESBL-E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the MIC 50/90 value was (0.5/1.5μg/mL). For MDR P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, the MIC 50/90 value was (0.75/2μg/mL) and (0.25/2μg/mL) respectively. Conclusion: Cefiderocol exhibits superior activity against ESBL coliform and MDR A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa compared to ceftolozane-Tazobactam.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmm.2022.262698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmm.2022.262698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:多药耐药(MDR)革兰氏阴性细菌感染的升级令人担忧,由于治疗选择不足,结果更差。迫切需要探索新的抗微生物药物来对抗这些耐药菌株。目的:评价头孢地罗和头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦对产esbls大肠菌群和耐多药鲍曼杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的抑菌活性。方法:收集外科ICU病例332例临床样本。鉴定了病原微生物。革兰氏阴性分离株进行药敏试验。筛选第三代耐头孢菌素大肠菌进行ESBL检测。研究了头孢唑烷-他唑巴坦和头孢德罗对ESBL大肠菌群和耐多药铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼假单胞菌的抑菌活性。结果:ESBL大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、耐多药铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼假单胞菌对头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦的敏感性分别为77%、70%、63%和58%。ESBL大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌对头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦的MIC值分别为(0.19/0.25μg/mL)和(0.25/0.5μg/mL)。耐多药铜绿假单胞菌MIC值为50/90 (2/4μg/mL)。MDR鲍曼芽胞杆菌MIC值较高(16/24μg/mL)。头孢地罗对大多数不同MIC值的菌株100%有效。ESBL-E。大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的MIC值为(0.5/1.5μg/mL)。耐多药铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa)和鲍曼假单胞菌(A. baumannii)的MIC分别为(0.75/2μg/mL)和(0.25/2μg/mL)。结论:头孢替罗col对ESBL大肠菌群和耐多药鲍曼杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌的抑菌活性优于头孢替罗唑-他唑巴坦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase–Producing Coliform and Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Background: A worrisome escalation in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections which are accompanied with worse outcomes due to inadequate treatment options. There is an imperative requirement to explore new antimicrobials to oppose these resistant strains. Objectives: Assessment of antibacterial activity of Cefiderocol and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against ESBL–Producing coliform and MDR A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. Methodology: A total of 332 clinical samples were obtained from surgical ICU cases. Pathogenic microorganisms were identified. Antibiotic susceptibility was done for gram negative isolates. Third-generation cephalosporins resistant coliforms were screened for ESBL detection. Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Cefiderocol activity on ESBL coliform and MDR P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates was investigated. Results: The susceptibility of both ESBL E. coli, K. pneumoniae, MDR P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii to ceftolozane/tazobactam was 77%, 70% ,63% and 58% respectively. ESBL E. coli and K. pneumonaie exhibited MIC 50/90 value of (0.19/0.25μg/mL) and (0.25/0.5μg/mL) for ceftolozane/tazobactam respectively. MDR P. aeruginosa showed MIC 50/90 value (2/4μg/mL). MDR A. baumannii exhibited high MIC 50/90 value (16/24μg/mL). Cefiderocol was 100% effective against most isolates with different MIC 50/90 values. For ESBL-E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the MIC 50/90 value was (0.5/1.5μg/mL). For MDR P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, the MIC 50/90 value was (0.75/2μg/mL) and (0.25/2μg/mL) respectively. Conclusion: Cefiderocol exhibits superior activity against ESBL coliform and MDR A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa compared to ceftolozane-Tazobactam.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信