ESP预测分析的实时实现——从数据科学走向价值实现

Antonio Andrade Marin, Issa Al Balushi, Adnan Al Ghadani, Hassana Al Abri, Abdullah Khalfan Said Al Zaabi, K. Dhuhli, I. Al Hadhrami, Saif Hamed Al Hinai, Fahad Masoud Al Aufi, Aziz Ali Al Bimani, Rahul Gala, Eduardo Marín, Nitish Kumar, Apurv Raj
{"title":"ESP预测分析的实时实现——从数据科学走向价值实现","authors":"Antonio Andrade Marin, Issa Al Balushi, Adnan Al Ghadani, Hassana Al Abri, Abdullah Khalfan Said Al Zaabi, K. Dhuhli, I. Al Hadhrami, Saif Hamed Al Hinai, Fahad Masoud Al Aufi, Aziz Ali Al Bimani, Rahul Gala, Eduardo Marín, Nitish Kumar, Apurv Raj","doi":"10.2118/207550-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure Prediction in Oil and Gas Artificial Lift Systems is materializing through the implementation of advanced analytics driven by physics-based models. During the Phase I of this project, two early failure prediction machine learning models were trained offline with historical data and evaluated through a blind test. The next challenge, Phase II, is to operationalize these models on Real-Time and re-assess their accuracy, precision and early prediction (in days) while having the assets focusing on either extending the runtime through optimization, chemical injection, etc. or proactive pump replacement (PPR) for high producers wells with triggered early prediction alarms. The paper details Phase II of live prediction for two assets consisting of 740 wells to enable data-driven insights in engineers’ daily workflow.\n In Phase I, a collaboration between SMEs and Data Scientists was established to build two failure prediction models for Electrical Submersible Pumps (ESP) using historical data that could identify failure prone wells along with the component at risk with high precision. Phase II entails the development of a Real-Time scoring pipeline to avail daily insights from this model for live wells. To achieve this, PDO leveraged its Digital Infrastructure for extraction of high-resolution measured data for 750 wells daily. A Well Management System (WMS) automatically sustains physics-based ESP models to calculate engineering variables from nodal analysis. Measured and engineered data are sampled, and referencing learnt patterns, the machine learning algorithm (MLA) estimates the probability of failure based on a daily rolling data window. An Exception Based Surveillance (EBS) system tracks well failure probability and highlights affected wells based on business logic. A visualization is developed to facilitate EBS interpretation. All the above steps are automated and synchronized among data historian, WMS and EBS System to operate on a daily schedule. From the Asset, at each highlighted exception, a focus team of well owners and SME initiate a review to correlate the failure probability with ESP signatures to validate the alarm. Aided by physics-based well models, action is directed either towards a) optimization, b) troubleshooting or c) proactive pump replacement in case of inevitable failure conditions. This workflow enables IT infrastructure and Asset readiness to benefit from various modeling initiatives in subsequent phases.\n Live Implementation of Exceptions from Predictive Analytics is an effective complement to well owners for prioritization of well reviews. Based on alarm validity, risk of failure and underperformance – optimizations, PPRs or workover scheduling are performed with reliability. This methodology would enable a Phase III of scaling up in Real-Time with growing assets wherethe system would be periodically retrained on True Negatives and maintained automatically with minimum manual intervention.\n It is experienced that a high precision model alone is not enough to reap the benefits of Predictive Analytics. The ability to operate in a production mode and embedding insights into decisions and actions, determines ROI on Data Science initiatives. Digital Infrastructure, a Real Time Well Modeling Platform and Cognitive adaptation of analytics by Well Owners are key for this operationalization that demands reliable data quality, computational efficiency, and data-driven decisions philosophy.","PeriodicalId":10981,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real Time Implementation of ESP Predictive Analytics - Towards Value Realization from Data Science\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Andrade Marin, Issa Al Balushi, Adnan Al Ghadani, Hassana Al Abri, Abdullah Khalfan Said Al Zaabi, K. Dhuhli, I. Al Hadhrami, Saif Hamed Al Hinai, Fahad Masoud Al Aufi, Aziz Ali Al Bimani, Rahul Gala, Eduardo Marín, Nitish Kumar, Apurv Raj\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/207550-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Failure Prediction in Oil and Gas Artificial Lift Systems is materializing through the implementation of advanced analytics driven by physics-based models. During the Phase I of this project, two early failure prediction machine learning models were trained offline with historical data and evaluated through a blind test. The next challenge, Phase II, is to operationalize these models on Real-Time and re-assess their accuracy, precision and early prediction (in days) while having the assets focusing on either extending the runtime through optimization, chemical injection, etc. or proactive pump replacement (PPR) for high producers wells with triggered early prediction alarms. The paper details Phase II of live prediction for two assets consisting of 740 wells to enable data-driven insights in engineers’ daily workflow.\\n In Phase I, a collaboration between SMEs and Data Scientists was established to build two failure prediction models for Electrical Submersible Pumps (ESP) using historical data that could identify failure prone wells along with the component at risk with high precision. Phase II entails the development of a Real-Time scoring pipeline to avail daily insights from this model for live wells. To achieve this, PDO leveraged its Digital Infrastructure for extraction of high-resolution measured data for 750 wells daily. A Well Management System (WMS) automatically sustains physics-based ESP models to calculate engineering variables from nodal analysis. Measured and engineered data are sampled, and referencing learnt patterns, the machine learning algorithm (MLA) estimates the probability of failure based on a daily rolling data window. An Exception Based Surveillance (EBS) system tracks well failure probability and highlights affected wells based on business logic. A visualization is developed to facilitate EBS interpretation. All the above steps are automated and synchronized among data historian, WMS and EBS System to operate on a daily schedule. From the Asset, at each highlighted exception, a focus team of well owners and SME initiate a review to correlate the failure probability with ESP signatures to validate the alarm. Aided by physics-based well models, action is directed either towards a) optimization, b) troubleshooting or c) proactive pump replacement in case of inevitable failure conditions. This workflow enables IT infrastructure and Asset readiness to benefit from various modeling initiatives in subsequent phases.\\n Live Implementation of Exceptions from Predictive Analytics is an effective complement to well owners for prioritization of well reviews. Based on alarm validity, risk of failure and underperformance – optimizations, PPRs or workover scheduling are performed with reliability. This methodology would enable a Phase III of scaling up in Real-Time with growing assets wherethe system would be periodically retrained on True Negatives and maintained automatically with minimum manual intervention.\\n It is experienced that a high precision model alone is not enough to reap the benefits of Predictive Analytics. The ability to operate in a production mode and embedding insights into decisions and actions, determines ROI on Data Science initiatives. Digital Infrastructure, a Real Time Well Modeling Platform and Cognitive adaptation of analytics by Well Owners are key for this operationalization that demands reliable data quality, computational efficiency, and data-driven decisions philosophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/207550-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207550-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

油气人工举升系统的故障预测是通过物理模型驱动的高级分析实现的。在该项目的第一阶段,使用历史数据离线训练两个早期故障预测机器学习模型,并通过盲测进行评估。下一个挑战,即第二阶段,是对这些模型进行实时操作,并重新评估其准确性、精度和早期预测(以天为单位),同时专注于通过优化、化学注入等方式延长运行时间,或者针对触发早期预测警报的高产井进行主动泵更换(PPR)。本文详细介绍了由740口井组成的两个资产的第二阶段实时预测,以便在工程师的日常工作流程中实现数据驱动的见解。在第一阶段,sme和Data Scientists建立了合作关系,利用历史数据为电潜泵(ESP)建立了两个故障预测模型,该模型可以高精度地识别容易发生故障的井以及有风险的部件。第二阶段需要开发实时评分管道,以利用该模型对活井的日常洞察。为了实现这一目标,PDO利用其数字基础设施每天提取750口井的高分辨率测量数据。井管理系统(WMS)自动维护基于物理的ESP模型,通过节点分析计算工程变量。对测量和工程数据进行采样,并参考学习模式,机器学习算法(MLA)基于每日滚动数据窗口估计故障概率。基于异常的监控(EBS)系统跟踪井的故障概率,并根据业务逻辑突出受影响的井。为了方便EBS的解释,开发了可视化工具。以上所有步骤在数据历史记录、WMS和EBS系统之间自动同步,按每日时间表运行。对于每个突出的异常情况,由井主和SME组成的重点小组都会启动检查,将故障概率与ESP信号相关联,以验证警报的有效性。在基于物理的井模型的帮助下,作业可以针对a)优化、b)故障排除或c)在不可避免的故障情况下主动更换泵。此工作流使IT基础设施和资产准备能够从后续阶段的各种建模活动中受益。预测分析的异常实时实施是对井主优先级评估的有效补充。基于告警有效性、故障风险和性能不佳优化、ppr或修井调度的可靠性执行。该方法将实现第三阶段的实时扩展,随着资产的增长,系统将定期对真负片进行再培训,并以最小的人工干预进行自动维护。经验表明,仅靠高精度模型是不足以获得预测分析的好处的。在生产模式下运作的能力,以及将洞察力嵌入决策和行动的能力,决定了数据科学计划的投资回报率。数字化基础设施、实时井建模平台和井主对分析的认知适应是实现这一操作的关键,这需要可靠的数据质量、计算效率和数据驱动的决策理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real Time Implementation of ESP Predictive Analytics - Towards Value Realization from Data Science
Failure Prediction in Oil and Gas Artificial Lift Systems is materializing through the implementation of advanced analytics driven by physics-based models. During the Phase I of this project, two early failure prediction machine learning models were trained offline with historical data and evaluated through a blind test. The next challenge, Phase II, is to operationalize these models on Real-Time and re-assess their accuracy, precision and early prediction (in days) while having the assets focusing on either extending the runtime through optimization, chemical injection, etc. or proactive pump replacement (PPR) for high producers wells with triggered early prediction alarms. The paper details Phase II of live prediction for two assets consisting of 740 wells to enable data-driven insights in engineers’ daily workflow. In Phase I, a collaboration between SMEs and Data Scientists was established to build two failure prediction models for Electrical Submersible Pumps (ESP) using historical data that could identify failure prone wells along with the component at risk with high precision. Phase II entails the development of a Real-Time scoring pipeline to avail daily insights from this model for live wells. To achieve this, PDO leveraged its Digital Infrastructure for extraction of high-resolution measured data for 750 wells daily. A Well Management System (WMS) automatically sustains physics-based ESP models to calculate engineering variables from nodal analysis. Measured and engineered data are sampled, and referencing learnt patterns, the machine learning algorithm (MLA) estimates the probability of failure based on a daily rolling data window. An Exception Based Surveillance (EBS) system tracks well failure probability and highlights affected wells based on business logic. A visualization is developed to facilitate EBS interpretation. All the above steps are automated and synchronized among data historian, WMS and EBS System to operate on a daily schedule. From the Asset, at each highlighted exception, a focus team of well owners and SME initiate a review to correlate the failure probability with ESP signatures to validate the alarm. Aided by physics-based well models, action is directed either towards a) optimization, b) troubleshooting or c) proactive pump replacement in case of inevitable failure conditions. This workflow enables IT infrastructure and Asset readiness to benefit from various modeling initiatives in subsequent phases. Live Implementation of Exceptions from Predictive Analytics is an effective complement to well owners for prioritization of well reviews. Based on alarm validity, risk of failure and underperformance – optimizations, PPRs or workover scheduling are performed with reliability. This methodology would enable a Phase III of scaling up in Real-Time with growing assets wherethe system would be periodically retrained on True Negatives and maintained automatically with minimum manual intervention. It is experienced that a high precision model alone is not enough to reap the benefits of Predictive Analytics. The ability to operate in a production mode and embedding insights into decisions and actions, determines ROI on Data Science initiatives. Digital Infrastructure, a Real Time Well Modeling Platform and Cognitive adaptation of analytics by Well Owners are key for this operationalization that demands reliable data quality, computational efficiency, and data-driven decisions philosophy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信