新制度经济学对国家贫富的看法。阿西莫格鲁和罗宾逊概念简评及总评

Q4 Mathematics
Joanna Dzionek-Kozłowska, R. Matera
{"title":"新制度经济学对国家贫富的看法。阿西莫格鲁和罗宾逊概念简评及总评","authors":"Joanna Dzionek-Kozłowska, R. Matera","doi":"10.1515/aicue-2015-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many thinkers made attempts to explain differences in economic development between countries, and point out what should be done to foster development. We review briefly some spectacular theories focused on these fundamental problems. We use the tools of economic analysis and the methods characteristic especially for institutional economics and economic history. However, the paper’s central aim is to analyse and assess one of the newest voices in that still open discussion coming from Acemoglu and Robinson and presented in their “Why Nation Failed? The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty”. Their book is brimmed with compelling illustrations, which we acknowledge as its strongest point. While the accuracy and coherence of their generalisations leave much to be desired. The analysis of those examples let to infer that the most important element encouraging or hampering economic development is the common participation of the people in economic and political processes.","PeriodicalId":55523,"journal":{"name":"Analele Stiintifice Ale Universitatii Al I Cuza Din Iasi - Matematica","volume":"2000 1","pages":"11 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Institutional Economics’ Perspective on Wealth and Poverty of Nations. Concise Review and General Remarks on Acemoglu and Robinson’s Concept\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Dzionek-Kozłowska, R. Matera\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/aicue-2015-0032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Many thinkers made attempts to explain differences in economic development between countries, and point out what should be done to foster development. We review briefly some spectacular theories focused on these fundamental problems. We use the tools of economic analysis and the methods characteristic especially for institutional economics and economic history. However, the paper’s central aim is to analyse and assess one of the newest voices in that still open discussion coming from Acemoglu and Robinson and presented in their “Why Nation Failed? The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty”. Their book is brimmed with compelling illustrations, which we acknowledge as its strongest point. While the accuracy and coherence of their generalisations leave much to be desired. The analysis of those examples let to infer that the most important element encouraging or hampering economic development is the common participation of the people in economic and political processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analele Stiintifice Ale Universitatii Al I Cuza Din Iasi - Matematica\",\"volume\":\"2000 1\",\"pages\":\"11 - 18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analele Stiintifice Ale Universitatii Al I Cuza Din Iasi - Matematica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/aicue-2015-0032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Stiintifice Ale Universitatii Al I Cuza Din Iasi - Matematica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aicue-2015-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

许多思想家试图解释国家间经济发展的差异,并指出应该如何促进发展。我们将简要回顾一些关注这些基本问题的引人注目的理论。我们使用经济分析的工具和方法,特别是制度经济学和经济史的特点。然而,本文的中心目标是分析和评估阿西莫格鲁和罗宾逊在他们的《为什么国家会失败?》《权力、繁荣和贫穷的起源》。他们的书充满了引人注目的插图,我们认为这是它的最大亮点。然而,他们的概括的准确性和连贯性还有很多需要改进的地方。对这些例子的分析可以推断,鼓励或阻碍经济发展的最重要因素是人民对经济和政治进程的共同参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Institutional Economics’ Perspective on Wealth and Poverty of Nations. Concise Review and General Remarks on Acemoglu and Robinson’s Concept
Abstract Many thinkers made attempts to explain differences in economic development between countries, and point out what should be done to foster development. We review briefly some spectacular theories focused on these fundamental problems. We use the tools of economic analysis and the methods characteristic especially for institutional economics and economic history. However, the paper’s central aim is to analyse and assess one of the newest voices in that still open discussion coming from Acemoglu and Robinson and presented in their “Why Nation Failed? The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty”. Their book is brimmed with compelling illustrations, which we acknowledge as its strongest point. While the accuracy and coherence of their generalisations leave much to be desired. The analysis of those examples let to infer that the most important element encouraging or hampering economic development is the common participation of the people in economic and political processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to the publication of original papers of moderate length addressed to a broad mathematical audience. It publishes results of original research and research-expository papers in all fields of mathematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信