孕妇妊娠期糖尿病筛查试验方法评价

Mehmet Özen, Nurten Dalgıç, Z. Aşık
{"title":"孕妇妊娠期糖尿病筛查试验方法评价","authors":"Mehmet Özen, Nurten Dalgıç, Z. Aşık","doi":"10.15511/TJTFP.20.00479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study to evaluate the approaches of pregnant women to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening test. Methods: 102 women with gestational age is 24-28 week, at the age of 18 and over, who were not diagnosed with Type I or Type II DM before the pregnancy, with a single pregnancy, were included in the study. Socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women, risk factors for GDM, whether GDM screening test and the reasons why pregnant women did not have screening test were questioned. Weight, body mass index, plasma glucose measurements and OGTT results of pregnant women with and without GDM risk factors were compared. Results: 53 (51.96%) of 102 pregnant women included in the study did not have GDM screening test. As the reason for not having a test; seven (13.2%) of the pregnant women thought that they should be screened with another method without sugar, six (11.3%) did not recommend by their doctor, six (11.3%) read in the media that test was harmful, six (11.3%) thought that test would harm the baby, and six (11.3%) stated that they did not know about the test. Ten (18,9%) did not report any reason. The rate of women in the risk group for GDM was 87.3%. The highest risk factor was the maternal age above 25 years (79.4%). In addition, 27,4% of pregnant women had first-degree relatives with Type II DM, 8,8% had a history of giving birth more than 4 kg in their previous pregnancy and 3.9% of women were diagnosed with GDM in their previous pregnancy. In pregnant women in the risk group for GDM; the mean age, weight, BMI and 50 g OGTT result were significantly higher than the other group. GDM was detected in six of 49 women had OGTT and all were in the risk group. Conclusion: GDM screening test rates of pregnant women are gradually decreasing. This is not due to educational level or socio-demographic characteristics. Pregnant women receive false information, especially through the media, and the importance of the issue cannot be understood adequately. Health personnel have important duties; risk factors that are proven to be associated with GDM should be questioned at first encounter with pregnant women. Screening test should be performed in early pregnancy in risky pregnant, who do not want to have screening tests should be followed up frequently with blood glucose measurements.","PeriodicalId":22867,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Turkish Family Physician","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of approaches of gestational diabetes screening test in pregnant women\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Özen, Nurten Dalgıç, Z. Aşık\",\"doi\":\"10.15511/TJTFP.20.00479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study to evaluate the approaches of pregnant women to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening test. Methods: 102 women with gestational age is 24-28 week, at the age of 18 and over, who were not diagnosed with Type I or Type II DM before the pregnancy, with a single pregnancy, were included in the study. Socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women, risk factors for GDM, whether GDM screening test and the reasons why pregnant women did not have screening test were questioned. Weight, body mass index, plasma glucose measurements and OGTT results of pregnant women with and without GDM risk factors were compared. Results: 53 (51.96%) of 102 pregnant women included in the study did not have GDM screening test. As the reason for not having a test; seven (13.2%) of the pregnant women thought that they should be screened with another method without sugar, six (11.3%) did not recommend by their doctor, six (11.3%) read in the media that test was harmful, six (11.3%) thought that test would harm the baby, and six (11.3%) stated that they did not know about the test. Ten (18,9%) did not report any reason. The rate of women in the risk group for GDM was 87.3%. The highest risk factor was the maternal age above 25 years (79.4%). In addition, 27,4% of pregnant women had first-degree relatives with Type II DM, 8,8% had a history of giving birth more than 4 kg in their previous pregnancy and 3.9% of women were diagnosed with GDM in their previous pregnancy. In pregnant women in the risk group for GDM; the mean age, weight, BMI and 50 g OGTT result were significantly higher than the other group. GDM was detected in six of 49 women had OGTT and all were in the risk group. Conclusion: GDM screening test rates of pregnant women are gradually decreasing. This is not due to educational level or socio-demographic characteristics. Pregnant women receive false information, especially through the media, and the importance of the issue cannot be understood adequately. Health personnel have important duties; risk factors that are proven to be associated with GDM should be questioned at first encounter with pregnant women. Screening test should be performed in early pregnancy in risky pregnant, who do not want to have screening tests should be followed up frequently with blood glucose measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Turkish Family Physician\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Turkish Family Physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15511/TJTFP.20.00479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Turkish Family Physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15511/TJTFP.20.00479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)筛查方法。方法:102例孕龄24-28周,年龄18岁及以上,孕前未诊断为1型或2型糖尿病的单次妊娠妇女纳入研究。对孕妇的社会人口学特征、GDM的危险因素、是否进行GDM筛查以及孕妇未进行筛查的原因进行了询问。比较有和无GDM危险因素孕妇的体重、体重指数、血糖测量和OGTT结果。结果:纳入研究的102例孕妇中,53例(51.96%)未进行GDM筛查试验。作为不做测试的原因;7名(13.2%)孕妇认为应该用其他不含糖的方法进行筛查,6名(11.3%)孕妇没有得到医生的建议,6名(11.3%)孕妇在媒体上读到测试有害,6名(11.3%)孕妇认为测试会伤害婴儿,6名(11.3%)孕妇表示不知道测试。10例(18.9%)未报告任何原因。GDM高危组女性比例为87.3%。最高危险因素为25岁以上产妇(79.4%)。此外,27.4%的孕妇有一级亲属患有II型糖尿病,8.8%的孕妇既往妊娠分娩超过4公斤,3.9%的孕妇在既往妊娠中被诊断为GDM。GDM危险组的孕妇;平均年龄、体重、BMI及50 g OGTT结果均显著高于对照组。49名患有OGTT的妇女中有6名被检测出GDM,并且都属于危险组。结论:妊娠期GDM筛查率呈逐渐下降趋势。这与教育水平或社会人口特征无关。孕妇接受虚假信息,特别是通过媒体,并不能充分理解这个问题的重要性。卫生人员负有重要职责;被证实与GDM相关的危险因素应该在第一次遇到孕妇时就被质疑。高危孕妇应在妊娠早期进行筛查试验,不愿进行筛查试验的孕妇应经常随访血糖测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of approaches of gestational diabetes screening test in pregnant women
Objective: The aim of this study to evaluate the approaches of pregnant women to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening test. Methods: 102 women with gestational age is 24-28 week, at the age of 18 and over, who were not diagnosed with Type I or Type II DM before the pregnancy, with a single pregnancy, were included in the study. Socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women, risk factors for GDM, whether GDM screening test and the reasons why pregnant women did not have screening test were questioned. Weight, body mass index, plasma glucose measurements and OGTT results of pregnant women with and without GDM risk factors were compared. Results: 53 (51.96%) of 102 pregnant women included in the study did not have GDM screening test. As the reason for not having a test; seven (13.2%) of the pregnant women thought that they should be screened with another method without sugar, six (11.3%) did not recommend by their doctor, six (11.3%) read in the media that test was harmful, six (11.3%) thought that test would harm the baby, and six (11.3%) stated that they did not know about the test. Ten (18,9%) did not report any reason. The rate of women in the risk group for GDM was 87.3%. The highest risk factor was the maternal age above 25 years (79.4%). In addition, 27,4% of pregnant women had first-degree relatives with Type II DM, 8,8% had a history of giving birth more than 4 kg in their previous pregnancy and 3.9% of women were diagnosed with GDM in their previous pregnancy. In pregnant women in the risk group for GDM; the mean age, weight, BMI and 50 g OGTT result were significantly higher than the other group. GDM was detected in six of 49 women had OGTT and all were in the risk group. Conclusion: GDM screening test rates of pregnant women are gradually decreasing. This is not due to educational level or socio-demographic characteristics. Pregnant women receive false information, especially through the media, and the importance of the issue cannot be understood adequately. Health personnel have important duties; risk factors that are proven to be associated with GDM should be questioned at first encounter with pregnant women. Screening test should be performed in early pregnancy in risky pregnant, who do not want to have screening tests should be followed up frequently with blood glucose measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信