整脊学生的手眼协调或一般自我效能感与他们在脊椎推拿检查中的表现:一项横断面研究

Christopher J. Hodgetts MPhysio, Timothy McLeish BSc, BClinChiro, Emily Thomas BSc, Bruce F. Walker DrPH
{"title":"整脊学生的手眼协调或一般自我效能感与他们在脊椎推拿检查中的表现:一项横断面研究","authors":"Christopher J. Hodgetts MPhysio,&nbsp;Timothy McLeish BSc, BClinChiro,&nbsp;Emily Thomas BSc,&nbsp;Bruce F. Walker DrPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2021.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between either hand-eye coordination (HEC) or general self-efficacy (GSE) and spinal-manipulative-therapy (SMT) exam scores. We also measured the interrater reliability of the SMT marking criteria used in our study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Third-year chiropractic students were recruited from the chiropractic spinal technique course at Murdoch University. They completed an alternate-hand wall-toss test to assess HEC and a questionnaire to evaluate GSE. </span>Linear regression models were used to assess the relationships between HEC and GSE on manual-therapy exam scores. Two assessors scored the examination, allowing the investigation of interrater reliability for the SMT marking criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 33 male and 31 female students, aged 20 to 44 years, completed both the GSE questionnaire and the SMT examination, but only 28 women also completed the HEC test. Male participants had higher scores on both HEC (9.4 additional catches, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and SMT (6.7%, <em>P</em> = .01) compared to female participants. There was no statistically significant relationship between HEC and SMT (<em>P</em> = .932). However, there was a linear relationship between GSE and SMT when adjusted for sex (<em>P</em><span> = .032). Furthermore, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the marking criteria was moderate to good, at 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.86).</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These preliminary results suggest that when adjusted for sex, a student's GSE may be related to their SMT exam scores. The alternate-hand wall-toss test was not correlated with SMT scores, but other HEC metrics may have a relationship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Chiropractic Students’ Hand-Eye Coordination or General Self-efficacy and Their Performance on a Spinal Manipulative Therapy Examination: A Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J. Hodgetts MPhysio,&nbsp;Timothy McLeish BSc, BClinChiro,&nbsp;Emily Thomas BSc,&nbsp;Bruce F. Walker DrPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2021.12.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between either hand-eye coordination (HEC) or general self-efficacy (GSE) and spinal-manipulative-therapy (SMT) exam scores. We also measured the interrater reliability of the SMT marking criteria used in our study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Third-year chiropractic students were recruited from the chiropractic spinal technique course at Murdoch University. They completed an alternate-hand wall-toss test to assess HEC and a questionnaire to evaluate GSE. </span>Linear regression models were used to assess the relationships between HEC and GSE on manual-therapy exam scores. Two assessors scored the examination, allowing the investigation of interrater reliability for the SMT marking criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 33 male and 31 female students, aged 20 to 44 years, completed both the GSE questionnaire and the SMT examination, but only 28 women also completed the HEC test. Male participants had higher scores on both HEC (9.4 additional catches, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and SMT (6.7%, <em>P</em> = .01) compared to female participants. There was no statistically significant relationship between HEC and SMT (<em>P</em> = .932). However, there was a linear relationship between GSE and SMT when adjusted for sex (<em>P</em><span> = .032). Furthermore, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the marking criteria was moderate to good, at 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.86).</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These preliminary results suggest that when adjusted for sex, a student's GSE may be related to their SMT exam scores. The alternate-hand wall-toss test was not correlated with SMT scores, but other HEC metrics may have a relationship.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370721000602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370721000602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨手眼协调能力(HEC)和一般自我效能感(GSE)与脊柱推拿疗法(SMT)考试成绩的关系。我们还测量了在我们的研究中使用的SMT标记标准的互译可靠性。方法招募莫道克大学脊椎指压术专业三年级学生。他们完成了评估HEC的交替手掷墙测试和评估GSE的问卷调查。采用线性回归模型评估HEC和GSE对手工治疗考试成绩的关系。两名评估员对考试进行评分,允许对SMT标记标准的判读员可靠性进行调查。结果20 ~ 44岁的学生中,男33人,女31人,完成了GSE问卷和SMT检查,女28人同时完成了HEC检查。与女性参与者相比,男性参与者在HEC(9.4额外捕获,P < 0.001)和SMT (6.7%, P = .01)上的得分更高。HEC与SMT的相关性无统计学意义(P = .932)。然而,当性别调整后,GSE和SMT之间存在线性关系(P = .032)。此外,评分标准的类内相关系数为中等至良好,为0.77(95%置信区间为0.63-0.86)。结论这些初步结果表明,当性别调整后,学生的GSE可能与他们的SMT考试成绩有关。交替手掷墙测试与SMT分数不相关,但其他HEC指标可能有关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Chiropractic Students’ Hand-Eye Coordination or General Self-efficacy and Their Performance on a Spinal Manipulative Therapy Examination: A Cross-sectional Study

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between either hand-eye coordination (HEC) or general self-efficacy (GSE) and spinal-manipulative-therapy (SMT) exam scores. We also measured the interrater reliability of the SMT marking criteria used in our study.

Methods

Third-year chiropractic students were recruited from the chiropractic spinal technique course at Murdoch University. They completed an alternate-hand wall-toss test to assess HEC and a questionnaire to evaluate GSE. Linear regression models were used to assess the relationships between HEC and GSE on manual-therapy exam scores. Two assessors scored the examination, allowing the investigation of interrater reliability for the SMT marking criteria.

Results

A total of 33 male and 31 female students, aged 20 to 44 years, completed both the GSE questionnaire and the SMT examination, but only 28 women also completed the HEC test. Male participants had higher scores on both HEC (9.4 additional catches, P < 0.001) and SMT (6.7%, P = .01) compared to female participants. There was no statistically significant relationship between HEC and SMT (P = .932). However, there was a linear relationship between GSE and SMT when adjusted for sex (P = .032). Furthermore, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the marking criteria was moderate to good, at 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.86).

Conclusion

These preliminary results suggest that when adjusted for sex, a student's GSE may be related to their SMT exam scores. The alternate-hand wall-toss test was not correlated with SMT scores, but other HEC metrics may have a relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信