设计教育课程质量的提高

Q3 Social Sciences
N. Mentzer, Lakshmy Mohandas, Shawn Farrington, Dawn Laux
{"title":"设计教育课程质量的提高","authors":"N. Mentzer, Lakshmy Mohandas, Shawn Farrington, Dawn Laux","doi":"10.21061/jte.v33i1.a.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching design in technology and engineering education is one of the key Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy (International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, 2021). Still, it can be challenging to provide a high-quality educational experience aligned with the standards required in introductory technology and engineering courses. Even after thorough preparation and delivering valuable content to students, students may feel the course was of low quality because it was required or not interesting. Our study investigated how improving the design thinking in technology courses based on the Expectancy Value Theory of motivation can impact students’ perceived course quality, as evidenced by course and instructor ratings. This study included nearly 1000 students in 25 sections. Quantitative analysis was completed using a t-test to measure differences in end-of-course evaluation scores for each section, and qualitative analysis of student evaluation responses was done through thematic analysis method. Our study showed that after making changes to a course based on Expectancy Value Theory, students’ ratings of both the course and instructor increased significantly. Expectancy Value Theory focuses the instructors’ course improvement efforts on three aspects which were manageable and resulted in significant improvement.","PeriodicalId":39755,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Education","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Course Quality Improvement in Design Education\",\"authors\":\"N. Mentzer, Lakshmy Mohandas, Shawn Farrington, Dawn Laux\",\"doi\":\"10.21061/jte.v33i1.a.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teaching design in technology and engineering education is one of the key Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy (International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, 2021). Still, it can be challenging to provide a high-quality educational experience aligned with the standards required in introductory technology and engineering courses. Even after thorough preparation and delivering valuable content to students, students may feel the course was of low quality because it was required or not interesting. Our study investigated how improving the design thinking in technology courses based on the Expectancy Value Theory of motivation can impact students’ perceived course quality, as evidenced by course and instructor ratings. This study included nearly 1000 students in 25 sections. Quantitative analysis was completed using a t-test to measure differences in end-of-course evaluation scores for each section, and qualitative analysis of student evaluation responses was done through thematic analysis method. Our study showed that after making changes to a course based on Expectancy Value Theory, students’ ratings of both the course and instructor increased significantly. Expectancy Value Theory focuses the instructors’ course improvement efforts on three aspects which were manageable and resulted in significant improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Technology Education\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v33i1.a.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v33i1.a.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

技术与工程教育中的教学设计是技术与工程素养的关键标准之一(国际技术与工程教育者协会,2021)。尽管如此,提供符合入门技术和工程课程要求的高质量教育体验仍然是一项挑战。即使经过了充分的准备,并向学生提供了有价值的内容,学生也可能会觉得课程质量很低,因为这是必修课,或者不有趣。我们的研究考察了基于动机期望值理论的技术课程设计思维的改善如何影响学生对课程质量的感知,并通过课程评分和讲师评分来证明。这项研究包括近1000名学生,分为25个小组。定量分析采用t检验测量各学科期末评价分数的差异,定性分析采用专题分析法对学生评价反应进行分析。我们的研究表明,根据期望值理论对课程进行修改后,学生对课程和教师的评分都显著提高。期望价值理论将教师的课程改进工作集中在三个方面,这些方面是可管理的,并产生了显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Course Quality Improvement in Design Education
Teaching design in technology and engineering education is one of the key Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy (International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, 2021). Still, it can be challenging to provide a high-quality educational experience aligned with the standards required in introductory technology and engineering courses. Even after thorough preparation and delivering valuable content to students, students may feel the course was of low quality because it was required or not interesting. Our study investigated how improving the design thinking in technology courses based on the Expectancy Value Theory of motivation can impact students’ perceived course quality, as evidenced by course and instructor ratings. This study included nearly 1000 students in 25 sections. Quantitative analysis was completed using a t-test to measure differences in end-of-course evaluation scores for each section, and qualitative analysis of student evaluation responses was done through thematic analysis method. Our study showed that after making changes to a course based on Expectancy Value Theory, students’ ratings of both the course and instructor increased significantly. Expectancy Value Theory focuses the instructors’ course improvement efforts on three aspects which were manageable and resulted in significant improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Technology Education
Journal of Technology Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Education provides a forum for scholarly discussion on topics relating to technology education. Manuscripts should focus on technology education research, philosophy, and theory. In addition, the Journal publishes book reviews, editorials, guest articles, comprehensive literature reviews, and reactions to previously published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信