{"title":"恪守精神病学伦理","authors":"L. Roberts","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2011.630058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A source of great personal suffering and societal burden, neuropsychiatric disease affects all people throughout the world. One hundred and fifty-one million individuals globally have depression, and nearly half (46%) of the people in the United States will experience an episode of mental illness during the course of their lives (WHO 2010). By 2020, mental illness will be the second leading cause of death and disability (Mitchell 2005), and by 2025, there will be roughly 34 million people living with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia (Alzheimer’s Society 2011; WHO 2010). Mental illness among young people is prevalent, and suicide is presently the third leading cause of death in adolescence and early adulthood (American Foundation for Suicide Prevention 2011; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011). Co-occurring conditions, such as substance dependence, intellectual disability, and medically complex diseases, are becoming usual rather than rare (Conway et al. 2006; Regier et al. 1990; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010). All of these patterns are worrisomely heightened in specific subpopulations, such as among indigenous peoples, rural elders and adolescents, the incarcerated, some military personnel and veterans, recent immigrants, and the very old (National Institute of Mental Health 2002; 2004; 2010; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011; Suicide Prevention Task Force 2010). And, by any measure, access to adequate health care services for neuropsychiatric diseases simply does not exist, even in economically established countries (The Commonwealth Fund 2011; World Health Organization 2011). Given the gravity of the consequences of neuropsychiatric disease, it is striking that these illnesses have been relatively neglected, whether considered from the perspective of public policy, science, or health systems. Clinically, neuropsychiatric disease is underrecognized, underdiagnosed, and undertreated (WHO 2010). The shortage of physicianscientists in psychiatry has reached a crisis (Coverdale et al. 2004; Fenton et al. 2004; Roane et al. 2009). From a bioethics point of view, on the other hand, ethical issues in health care and research involving people with neuropsychiatric diseases have been long, widely, and contentiously discussed. Conclusions remain elusive, though, despite the extensive","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"1 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Committing to Psychiatric Ethics\",\"authors\":\"L. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21507716.2011.630058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A source of great personal suffering and societal burden, neuropsychiatric disease affects all people throughout the world. One hundred and fifty-one million individuals globally have depression, and nearly half (46%) of the people in the United States will experience an episode of mental illness during the course of their lives (WHO 2010). By 2020, mental illness will be the second leading cause of death and disability (Mitchell 2005), and by 2025, there will be roughly 34 million people living with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia (Alzheimer’s Society 2011; WHO 2010). Mental illness among young people is prevalent, and suicide is presently the third leading cause of death in adolescence and early adulthood (American Foundation for Suicide Prevention 2011; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011). Co-occurring conditions, such as substance dependence, intellectual disability, and medically complex diseases, are becoming usual rather than rare (Conway et al. 2006; Regier et al. 1990; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010). All of these patterns are worrisomely heightened in specific subpopulations, such as among indigenous peoples, rural elders and adolescents, the incarcerated, some military personnel and veterans, recent immigrants, and the very old (National Institute of Mental Health 2002; 2004; 2010; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011; Suicide Prevention Task Force 2010). And, by any measure, access to adequate health care services for neuropsychiatric diseases simply does not exist, even in economically established countries (The Commonwealth Fund 2011; World Health Organization 2011). Given the gravity of the consequences of neuropsychiatric disease, it is striking that these illnesses have been relatively neglected, whether considered from the perspective of public policy, science, or health systems. Clinically, neuropsychiatric disease is underrecognized, underdiagnosed, and undertreated (WHO 2010). The shortage of physicianscientists in psychiatry has reached a crisis (Coverdale et al. 2004; Fenton et al. 2004; Roane et al. 2009). From a bioethics point of view, on the other hand, ethical issues in health care and research involving people with neuropsychiatric diseases have been long, widely, and contentiously discussed. Conclusions remain elusive, though, despite the extensive\",\"PeriodicalId\":89316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.630058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.630058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
神经精神疾病是巨大的个人痛苦和社会负担的来源,影响全世界所有人。全球有1.51亿人患有抑郁症,近一半(46%)的美国人在其一生中将经历一次精神疾病发作(世卫组织,2010年)。到2020年,精神疾病将成为导致死亡和残疾的第二大原因(Mitchell 2005),到2025年,将有大约3 400万人患有阿尔茨海默病和其他形式的痴呆症(阿尔茨海默病协会,2011年;2010)。年轻人中精神疾病很普遍,自杀目前是青少年和成年早期死亡的第三大原因(美国自杀预防基金会,2011年;疾病控制和预防中心,2011年)。同时发生的情况,如物质依赖、智力残疾和医学上复杂的疾病,正变得越来越常见,而不是罕见(Conway等人,2006年;Regier et al. 1990;美国卫生与公众服务部,国家卫生研究院,国家药物滥用研究所,2010年)。所有这些模式在特定人群中都令人担忧地加剧,例如在土著人民、农村老年人和青少年、被监禁者、一些军事人员和退伍军人、新移民和老年人中(国家心理健康研究所,2002年;2004;2010;疾病控制和预防中心2011;预防自杀专责小组(2010)。而且,无论以何种标准衡量,即使在经济发达的国家,也根本不存在获得适当的神经精神疾病保健服务的机会(英联邦基金,2011年;世界卫生组织(2011年)。考虑到神经精神疾病后果的严重性,无论是从公共政策、科学还是卫生系统的角度考虑,这些疾病都相对被忽视,这一点令人震惊。在临床上,神经精神疾病未被充分认识、诊断和治疗(世卫组织,2010年)。精神病学医生的短缺已经达到了危机(Coverdale et al. 2004;Fenton et al. 2004;Roane et al. 2009)。另一方面,从生物伦理学的角度来看,涉及神经精神疾病患者的卫生保健和研究中的伦理问题已经被长期、广泛和有争议地讨论过。结论仍然难以捉摸,尽管广泛
A source of great personal suffering and societal burden, neuropsychiatric disease affects all people throughout the world. One hundred and fifty-one million individuals globally have depression, and nearly half (46%) of the people in the United States will experience an episode of mental illness during the course of their lives (WHO 2010). By 2020, mental illness will be the second leading cause of death and disability (Mitchell 2005), and by 2025, there will be roughly 34 million people living with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia (Alzheimer’s Society 2011; WHO 2010). Mental illness among young people is prevalent, and suicide is presently the third leading cause of death in adolescence and early adulthood (American Foundation for Suicide Prevention 2011; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011). Co-occurring conditions, such as substance dependence, intellectual disability, and medically complex diseases, are becoming usual rather than rare (Conway et al. 2006; Regier et al. 1990; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010). All of these patterns are worrisomely heightened in specific subpopulations, such as among indigenous peoples, rural elders and adolescents, the incarcerated, some military personnel and veterans, recent immigrants, and the very old (National Institute of Mental Health 2002; 2004; 2010; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011; Suicide Prevention Task Force 2010). And, by any measure, access to adequate health care services for neuropsychiatric diseases simply does not exist, even in economically established countries (The Commonwealth Fund 2011; World Health Organization 2011). Given the gravity of the consequences of neuropsychiatric disease, it is striking that these illnesses have been relatively neglected, whether considered from the perspective of public policy, science, or health systems. Clinically, neuropsychiatric disease is underrecognized, underdiagnosed, and undertreated (WHO 2010). The shortage of physicianscientists in psychiatry has reached a crisis (Coverdale et al. 2004; Fenton et al. 2004; Roane et al. 2009). From a bioethics point of view, on the other hand, ethical issues in health care and research involving people with neuropsychiatric diseases have been long, widely, and contentiously discussed. Conclusions remain elusive, though, despite the extensive