主题建模的经验贝叶斯方法

Anirban Gangopadhyay
{"title":"主题建模的经验贝叶斯方法","authors":"Anirban Gangopadhyay","doi":"10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given a corpus of documents, we consider the problem of finding latent topics, and introduce a novel Empirical Bayes based framework that allows us to choose the optimal topic modeling algorithm given observed variables in the data. We specifically consider three disparate algorithms - LDA, graph clustering, and non-negative matrix factorization - and provide a standardized framework that compares statistical and generative assumptions each algorithm makes. We then provide a model selection algorithm that quantifies each model based on how well assumptions match the data. We illustrate the efficacy of our approach by applying our framework to different sets of document corpuses and empirically measuring results.","PeriodicalId":6783,"journal":{"name":"2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)","volume":"78 1","pages":"2803-2808"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Bayes Approach to Topic Modeling\",\"authors\":\"Anirban Gangopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given a corpus of documents, we consider the problem of finding latent topics, and introduce a novel Empirical Bayes based framework that allows us to choose the optimal topic modeling algorithm given observed variables in the data. We specifically consider three disparate algorithms - LDA, graph clustering, and non-negative matrix factorization - and provide a standardized framework that compares statistical and generative assumptions each algorithm makes. We then provide a model selection algorithm that quantifies each model based on how well assumptions match the data. We illustrate the efficacy of our approach by applying our framework to different sets of document corpuses and empirically measuring results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"2803-2808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

给定一个文档语料库,我们考虑寻找潜在主题的问题,并引入一种新的基于经验贝叶斯的框架,该框架允许我们根据数据中观察到的变量选择最佳主题建模算法。我们特别考虑了三种不同的算法——LDA、图聚类和非负矩阵分解——并提供了一个标准化的框架来比较每种算法所做的统计和生成假设。然后,我们提供了一个模型选择算法,该算法根据假设与数据的匹配程度来量化每个模型。我们通过将我们的框架应用于不同的文档语料库集和经验测量结果来说明我们方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Bayes Approach to Topic Modeling
Given a corpus of documents, we consider the problem of finding latent topics, and introduce a novel Empirical Bayes based framework that allows us to choose the optimal topic modeling algorithm given observed variables in the data. We specifically consider three disparate algorithms - LDA, graph clustering, and non-negative matrix factorization - and provide a standardized framework that compares statistical and generative assumptions each algorithm makes. We then provide a model selection algorithm that quantifies each model based on how well assumptions match the data. We illustrate the efficacy of our approach by applying our framework to different sets of document corpuses and empirically measuring results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信