印度大型股票基金的阿尔法——两个时期的故事

Mutual Funds Pub Date : 2021-09-23 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3929136
Rajan Raju
{"title":"印度大型股票基金的阿尔法——两个时期的故事","authors":"Rajan Raju","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3929136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We look at the trend of alpha generation among 18 large-cap equity mutual funds in India between September 2010 and August 2021. Between September 2013 and December 2017, these schemes, on average, outperformed a NIFTY 50 index tracker fund (average annualised 3-year alpha of 3.22%), but since January 2018 have, on average, underperformed the index tracker (average annualised 3-year alpha of -1.65%). While average R2, a traditional measure of active management or selectivity, between returns of large-cap schemes in our sample and those of a large-cap index tracking fund, has remained stable at 0.93 through the period, there have been key changes to selectivity of schemes. 1 in 3 funds every month have had R2 >= 0.95, a popular benchmark for “closet index” funds. We show that the pandemic has significantly impaired the returns from selectivity as seen in the jump in the average R2 from 2020 and is a significant driver for the drop in 3-year alpha between 2018-2021. Finally, there is a weak but significant inverse relationship between large-cap scheme alpha and R2.","PeriodicalId":18891,"journal":{"name":"Mutual Funds","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alpha in Indian Large Cap Equity Funds - A Tale of Two Periods\",\"authors\":\"Rajan Raju\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3929136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We look at the trend of alpha generation among 18 large-cap equity mutual funds in India between September 2010 and August 2021. Between September 2013 and December 2017, these schemes, on average, outperformed a NIFTY 50 index tracker fund (average annualised 3-year alpha of 3.22%), but since January 2018 have, on average, underperformed the index tracker (average annualised 3-year alpha of -1.65%). While average R2, a traditional measure of active management or selectivity, between returns of large-cap schemes in our sample and those of a large-cap index tracking fund, has remained stable at 0.93 through the period, there have been key changes to selectivity of schemes. 1 in 3 funds every month have had R2 >= 0.95, a popular benchmark for “closet index” funds. We show that the pandemic has significantly impaired the returns from selectivity as seen in the jump in the average R2 from 2020 and is a significant driver for the drop in 3-year alpha between 2018-2021. Finally, there is a weak but significant inverse relationship between large-cap scheme alpha and R2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutual Funds\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutual Funds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3929136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutual Funds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3929136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了2010年9月至2021年8月期间印度18只大型股票共同基金的α世代趋势。在2013年9月至2017年12月期间,这些计划的平均表现优于NIFTY 50指数跟踪基金(平均3年年化阿尔法为3.22%),但自2018年1月以来,平均表现低于指数跟踪基金(平均3年年化阿尔法为-1.65%)。在我们的样本中,大盘股计划与大盘股指数跟踪基金的回报率之间的平均R2(一种衡量主动管理或选择性的传统指标)在此期间一直稳定在0.93,但计划的选择性发生了关键变化。每月有三分之一的基金R2 >= 0.95,这是“壁橱指数”基金的流行基准。我们表明,从2020年以来平均R2的跃升可以看出,大流行严重损害了选择性的回报,并且是2018-2021年期间3年alpha下降的重要驱动因素。最后,大盘股方案α与R2之间存在微弱但显著的负相关关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alpha in Indian Large Cap Equity Funds - A Tale of Two Periods
We look at the trend of alpha generation among 18 large-cap equity mutual funds in India between September 2010 and August 2021. Between September 2013 and December 2017, these schemes, on average, outperformed a NIFTY 50 index tracker fund (average annualised 3-year alpha of 3.22%), but since January 2018 have, on average, underperformed the index tracker (average annualised 3-year alpha of -1.65%). While average R2, a traditional measure of active management or selectivity, between returns of large-cap schemes in our sample and those of a large-cap index tracking fund, has remained stable at 0.93 through the period, there have been key changes to selectivity of schemes. 1 in 3 funds every month have had R2 >= 0.95, a popular benchmark for “closet index” funds. We show that the pandemic has significantly impaired the returns from selectivity as seen in the jump in the average R2 from 2020 and is a significant driver for the drop in 3-year alpha between 2018-2021. Finally, there is a weak but significant inverse relationship between large-cap scheme alpha and R2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信