中国的收获:中国可以从英国衍生行为的经验中学到什么?

Q4 Social Sciences
Fangyuan Ma
{"title":"中国的收获:中国可以从英国衍生行为的经验中学到什么?","authors":"Fangyuan Ma","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2013.054768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article evaluates the derivative actions in England and China from a comparative perspective. The statutory derivative actions are introduced by the Companies Act 2006 in England to replace the rules at common law; whilst derivative actions are introduced for the first time in China by the Chinese Company Law 2005. It is argued that some pertinent and important lessons can be learnt from the English experience for future law reforms in China, taking into account their distinct constitutional-political, socio-economic, legal and cultural backgrounds. In particular, a more sophisticated set of procedural rules should be established in China to minimise the number of malicious suits and the courts should play a substantially more active role in determining whether derivative actions can proceed. At the same time, the unfair prejudice remedy should also be considered for adoption in future Chinese company law reform.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"26 1","pages":"267-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese take-aways: what can China learn from the English experience of derivative actions?\",\"authors\":\"Fangyuan Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2013.054768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article evaluates the derivative actions in England and China from a comparative perspective. The statutory derivative actions are introduced by the Companies Act 2006 in England to replace the rules at common law; whilst derivative actions are introduced for the first time in China by the Chinese Company Law 2005. It is argued that some pertinent and important lessons can be learnt from the English experience for future law reforms in China, taking into account their distinct constitutional-political, socio-economic, legal and cultural backgrounds. In particular, a more sophisticated set of procedural rules should be established in China to minimise the number of malicious suits and the courts should play a substantially more active role in determining whether derivative actions can proceed. At the same time, the unfair prejudice remedy should also be considered for adoption in future Chinese company law reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"267-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2013.054768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2013.054768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从比较的角度对英国和中国的衍生诉讼进行了评价。法定派生诉讼是由英国《2006年公司法》引入的,以取代普通法中的规则;而衍生诉讼则是在2005年《中国公司法》中首次引入的。本文认为,考虑到中国不同的宪政、社会经济、法律和文化背景,英国的经验可以为中国未来的法律改革提供一些相关和重要的经验教训。特别是,中国应该建立一套更复杂的程序规则,以尽量减少恶意诉讼的数量,法院应该在决定衍生诉讼是否可以进行方面发挥更积极的作用。同时,不公平损害救济也应在今后的公司法改革中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chinese take-aways: what can China learn from the English experience of derivative actions?
This article evaluates the derivative actions in England and China from a comparative perspective. The statutory derivative actions are introduced by the Companies Act 2006 in England to replace the rules at common law; whilst derivative actions are introduced for the first time in China by the Chinese Company Law 2005. It is argued that some pertinent and important lessons can be learnt from the English experience for future law reforms in China, taking into account their distinct constitutional-political, socio-economic, legal and cultural backgrounds. In particular, a more sophisticated set of procedural rules should be established in China to minimise the number of malicious suits and the courts should play a substantially more active role in determining whether derivative actions can proceed. At the same time, the unfair prejudice remedy should also be considered for adoption in future Chinese company law reform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信