“所有的道路对所有人开放”:安东尼·特罗洛普和玛丽·西科尔在中美洲过境区

IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
ELH Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1353/elh.2023.0005
Dennis M. Hogan
{"title":"“所有的道路对所有人开放”:安东尼·特罗洛普和玛丽·西科尔在中美洲过境区","authors":"Dennis M. Hogan","doi":"10.1353/elh.2023.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article focuses on two writers whose work on Panama and Nicaragua confronts Britain's supersession by the United States as the hegemonic power in Central America. Reading the nurse and memoirist Mary Seacole and the novelist and civil servant Anthony Trollope, I argue that these British subjects both understood the fate of the Empire as tied to that of the Central American transit zones, particularly the transoceanic route across Panama. They differed, however, on whom waning British influence in Central America would benefit. While Trollope saw commercial and cultural continuity in an uninterrupted Anglo-American dominance of the hemisphere, Seacole, a Black Jamaican for whom the Empire functioned as a guarantor of political status within a larger colonial framework, worried that the United States would subject the region to its regime of strict racial separation. Taken together, these accounts suggest a surprising inversion of imperial identifications: Trollope evinces an informal imperialist's disdain for official entanglements, while Seacole emphasizes that her status as a British subject entails a duty on the part of the Empire to protect the region and its people from American rapaciousness.","PeriodicalId":46490,"journal":{"name":"ELH","volume":"125 1","pages":"137 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"All Ways Open to all Men\\\": Anthony Trollope and Mary Seacole in The Central American Transit Zones\",\"authors\":\"Dennis M. Hogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/elh.2023.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article focuses on two writers whose work on Panama and Nicaragua confronts Britain's supersession by the United States as the hegemonic power in Central America. Reading the nurse and memoirist Mary Seacole and the novelist and civil servant Anthony Trollope, I argue that these British subjects both understood the fate of the Empire as tied to that of the Central American transit zones, particularly the transoceanic route across Panama. They differed, however, on whom waning British influence in Central America would benefit. While Trollope saw commercial and cultural continuity in an uninterrupted Anglo-American dominance of the hemisphere, Seacole, a Black Jamaican for whom the Empire functioned as a guarantor of political status within a larger colonial framework, worried that the United States would subject the region to its regime of strict racial separation. Taken together, these accounts suggest a surprising inversion of imperial identifications: Trollope evinces an informal imperialist's disdain for official entanglements, while Seacole emphasizes that her status as a British subject entails a duty on the part of the Empire to protect the region and its people from American rapaciousness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELH\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"137 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2023.0005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2023.0005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文关注的是两位作家,他们在巴拿马和尼加拉瓜问题上的作品对抗了美国在中美洲的霸权地位——英国被美国所取代。通过阅读护士兼回忆录作家玛丽·西科尔(Mary Seacole)和小说家兼公务员安东尼·特罗洛普(Anthony Trollope)的作品,我认为,这些英国臣子都明白,帝国的命运与中美洲过境区,尤其是穿越巴拿马的跨洋航线的命运息息相关。然而,他们在英国在中美洲逐渐减弱的影响力对谁有利的问题上存在分歧。特罗洛普看到了英美在西半球的不间断统治所带来的商业和文化上的连续性,而西科尔,一个牙买加黑人,对他来说,大英帝国在一个更大的殖民框架内扮演着政治地位的保证者的角色,担心美国将把该地区置于其严格的种族隔离制度之下。综合起来,这些叙述表明了帝国身份的惊人颠倒:特罗洛普表现了一个非正式的帝国主义者对官方纠缠的蔑视,而西科尔强调,她作为英国臣民的身份意味着帝国有责任保护该地区及其人民免受美国人的掠夺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"All Ways Open to all Men": Anthony Trollope and Mary Seacole in The Central American Transit Zones
Abstract:This article focuses on two writers whose work on Panama and Nicaragua confronts Britain's supersession by the United States as the hegemonic power in Central America. Reading the nurse and memoirist Mary Seacole and the novelist and civil servant Anthony Trollope, I argue that these British subjects both understood the fate of the Empire as tied to that of the Central American transit zones, particularly the transoceanic route across Panama. They differed, however, on whom waning British influence in Central America would benefit. While Trollope saw commercial and cultural continuity in an uninterrupted Anglo-American dominance of the hemisphere, Seacole, a Black Jamaican for whom the Empire functioned as a guarantor of political status within a larger colonial framework, worried that the United States would subject the region to its regime of strict racial separation. Taken together, these accounts suggest a surprising inversion of imperial identifications: Trollope evinces an informal imperialist's disdain for official entanglements, while Seacole emphasizes that her status as a British subject entails a duty on the part of the Empire to protect the region and its people from American rapaciousness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ELH
ELH LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信