文书的承认与执行与判决的承认与执行的区别

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Maria Dymitruk, Jacek Gołaczyński, M. Kaczorowska, Piotr Rodziewicz
{"title":"文书的承认与执行与判决的承认与执行的区别","authors":"Maria Dymitruk, Jacek Gołaczyński, M. Kaczorowska, Piotr Rodziewicz","doi":"10.18690/lexonomica.13.1.1-16.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the article is to analyse and compare the specificity of judgments and authentic instruments in terms of cross-border recognition and enforcement under the Brussels I Recast Regulation framework. Particular focus has been put on the practical aspects of the definition of an authentic instrument. Selected detailed issues arising against this background have been discussed with reference to the Polish legal order as well as the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Based on the undertaken considerations, some proposals have been formulated regarding the enhancement of the free circulation of authentic instruments within the European Union.","PeriodicalId":40392,"journal":{"name":"Lexonomica","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences Between the Recognition and Enforcement of Authentic Instruments and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments\",\"authors\":\"Maria Dymitruk, Jacek Gołaczyński, M. Kaczorowska, Piotr Rodziewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/lexonomica.13.1.1-16.2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of the article is to analyse and compare the specificity of judgments and authentic instruments in terms of cross-border recognition and enforcement under the Brussels I Recast Regulation framework. Particular focus has been put on the practical aspects of the definition of an authentic instrument. Selected detailed issues arising against this background have been discussed with reference to the Polish legal order as well as the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Based on the undertaken considerations, some proposals have been formulated regarding the enhancement of the free circulation of authentic instruments within the European Union.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lexonomica\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lexonomica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.13.1.1-16.2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexonomica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.13.1.1-16.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主题是分析和比较在布鲁塞尔第一次修订条例框架下跨境承认和执行方面的判决和真实文书的特殊性。特别侧重于真正文书定义的实际方面。在此背景下产生的若干详细问题已参照波兰法律秩序以及欧洲联盟法院(欧洲法院)的判例法进行了讨论。根据已进行的考虑,已就加强欧洲联盟内真正文书的自由流通拟订了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences Between the Recognition and Enforcement of Authentic Instruments and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments
The subject of the article is to analyse and compare the specificity of judgments and authentic instruments in terms of cross-border recognition and enforcement under the Brussels I Recast Regulation framework. Particular focus has been put on the practical aspects of the definition of an authentic instrument. Selected detailed issues arising against this background have been discussed with reference to the Polish legal order as well as the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Based on the undertaken considerations, some proposals have been formulated regarding the enhancement of the free circulation of authentic instruments within the European Union.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lexonomica
Lexonomica LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信