A. Giammò, E. Ammirati, A. Tullio, G. Morgia, S. Sandri, C. Introini, G. Canepa, L. Timossi, C. Rossi, C. Mozzi, R. Carone
{"title":"植入ATOMS®系统治疗术后男性压力性尿失禁:意大利多中心研究。","authors":"A. Giammò, E. Ammirati, A. Tullio, G. Morgia, S. Sandri, C. Introini, G. Canepa, L. Timossi, C. Rossi, C. Mozzi, R. Carone","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03457-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of the ATOMS system for the treatment of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI).\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe included all consevutive male patients referring for postoperative SUI and treated with ATOMS system from June 2013 to July 2017. Patients received anamnesis, 24h pad test, pad count, physical examination, urodynamic evaluation, ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire. We excluded patients with low bladder capacity and compliance, uncontrolled detrusor overactivity.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe treated 98 patients with median age of 70.21 ± 10.02 years. The most common cause of SUI was open radical prostatectomy in 79 patients. Ten patients had undergone urethrotomy, 7 bladder neck incision, 14 adjuvant radiotherapy. Thirty-nine patients suffered of mild incontinence (24h pad test <200g), 49 moderate incontinence (200-400g), 10 severe incontinence (≥400g). 31 patients underwent previous incontinence surgery: 29 ProACT, 3 artificial urinary sphincter (in 2 cases both devices), 1 bulking agents and subsequent male sling. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. We had a significant reduction of mean 24h pads test, pad count and ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire (p<0.01). At last follow-up 47.96% of patients were dry and 79.59% reached social continence. A high incontinence grade, adjuvant radiotherapy, previous urethral surgery and incontinence surgery have been associated with lower continence results. We had complications in 33 patients (33.7%). The device was removed in 4 cases due to scrotal port erosion and in one case due to persistent pain.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe ATOMS system seems to be an effective and safe surgical treatment for postoperative male SUI.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implant of ATOMS® system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: an Italian multicentric study.\",\"authors\":\"A. Giammò, E. Ammirati, A. Tullio, G. Morgia, S. Sandri, C. Introini, G. Canepa, L. Timossi, C. Rossi, C. Mozzi, R. Carone\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03457-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThe aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of the ATOMS system for the treatment of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI).\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe included all consevutive male patients referring for postoperative SUI and treated with ATOMS system from June 2013 to July 2017. Patients received anamnesis, 24h pad test, pad count, physical examination, urodynamic evaluation, ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire. We excluded patients with low bladder capacity and compliance, uncontrolled detrusor overactivity.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWe treated 98 patients with median age of 70.21 ± 10.02 years. The most common cause of SUI was open radical prostatectomy in 79 patients. Ten patients had undergone urethrotomy, 7 bladder neck incision, 14 adjuvant radiotherapy. Thirty-nine patients suffered of mild incontinence (24h pad test <200g), 49 moderate incontinence (200-400g), 10 severe incontinence (≥400g). 31 patients underwent previous incontinence surgery: 29 ProACT, 3 artificial urinary sphincter (in 2 cases both devices), 1 bulking agents and subsequent male sling. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. We had a significant reduction of mean 24h pads test, pad count and ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire (p<0.01). At last follow-up 47.96% of patients were dry and 79.59% reached social continence. A high incontinence grade, adjuvant radiotherapy, previous urethral surgery and incontinence surgery have been associated with lower continence results. We had complications in 33 patients (33.7%). The device was removed in 4 cases due to scrotal port erosion and in one case due to persistent pain.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe ATOMS system seems to be an effective and safe surgical treatment for postoperative male SUI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03457-X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03457-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implant of ATOMS® system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: an Italian multicentric study.
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of the ATOMS system for the treatment of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
METHODS
We included all consevutive male patients referring for postoperative SUI and treated with ATOMS system from June 2013 to July 2017. Patients received anamnesis, 24h pad test, pad count, physical examination, urodynamic evaluation, ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire. We excluded patients with low bladder capacity and compliance, uncontrolled detrusor overactivity.
RESULTS
We treated 98 patients with median age of 70.21 ± 10.02 years. The most common cause of SUI was open radical prostatectomy in 79 patients. Ten patients had undergone urethrotomy, 7 bladder neck incision, 14 adjuvant radiotherapy. Thirty-nine patients suffered of mild incontinence (24h pad test <200g), 49 moderate incontinence (200-400g), 10 severe incontinence (≥400g). 31 patients underwent previous incontinence surgery: 29 ProACT, 3 artificial urinary sphincter (in 2 cases both devices), 1 bulking agents and subsequent male sling. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. We had a significant reduction of mean 24h pads test, pad count and ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire (p<0.01). At last follow-up 47.96% of patients were dry and 79.59% reached social continence. A high incontinence grade, adjuvant radiotherapy, previous urethral surgery and incontinence surgery have been associated with lower continence results. We had complications in 33 patients (33.7%). The device was removed in 4 cases due to scrotal port erosion and in one case due to persistent pain.
CONCLUSIONS
The ATOMS system seems to be an effective and safe surgical treatment for postoperative male SUI.
期刊介绍:
The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.