这首歌到底是关于什么的?:使用用户解释和歌词自动分类主题

Kahyun Choi, Jin Ha Lee, J. S. Downie
{"title":"这首歌到底是关于什么的?:使用用户解释和歌词自动分类主题","authors":"Kahyun Choi, Jin Ha Lee, J. S. Downie","doi":"10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metadata research for music digital libraries has traditionally focused on genre. Despite its potential for improving the ability of users to better search and browse music collections, music subject metadata is an unexplored area. The objective of this study is to expand the scope of music metadata research, in particular, by exploring music subject classification based on user interpretations of music. Furthermore, we compare this previously unexplored form of user data to lyrics at subject prediction tasks. In our experiment, we use datasets consisting of 900 songs annotated with user interpretations. To determine the significance of performance differences between the two sources, we applied Friedman's ANOVA test on the classification accuracies. The results show that user-generated interpretations are significantly more useful than lyrics as classification features (p <; 0.05). The findings support the possibility of exploiting various existing sources for subject metadata enrichment in music digital libraries.","PeriodicalId":92278,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","volume":"8 1","pages":"453-454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is this song about anyway?: Automatic classification of subject using user interpretations and lyrics\",\"authors\":\"Kahyun Choi, Jin Ha Lee, J. S. Downie\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Metadata research for music digital libraries has traditionally focused on genre. Despite its potential for improving the ability of users to better search and browse music collections, music subject metadata is an unexplored area. The objective of this study is to expand the scope of music metadata research, in particular, by exploring music subject classification based on user interpretations of music. Furthermore, we compare this previously unexplored form of user data to lyrics at subject prediction tasks. In our experiment, we use datasets consisting of 900 songs annotated with user interpretations. To determine the significance of performance differences between the two sources, we applied Friedman's ANOVA test on the classification accuracies. The results show that user-generated interpretations are significantly more useful than lyrics as classification features (p <; 0.05). The findings support the possibility of exploiting various existing sources for subject metadata enrichment in music digital libraries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"453-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

传统上,音乐数字图书馆的元数据研究主要集中在音乐类型上。尽管音乐主题元数据有可能提高用户更好地搜索和浏览音乐收藏的能力,但它仍然是一个未开发的领域。本研究的目的是扩大音乐元数据研究的范围,特别是通过探索基于用户对音乐的解释的音乐主题分类。此外,我们将这种以前未开发的用户数据形式与主题预测任务中的歌词进行比较。在我们的实验中,我们使用了由900首歌曲组成的数据集,并附有用户解释。为了确定两种来源之间性能差异的显著性,我们对分类精度应用了Friedman's ANOVA检验。结果表明,作为分类特征,用户生成的解释明显比歌词更有用(p <;0.05)。研究结果支持了在音乐数字图书馆中利用各种现有资源丰富主题元数据的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is this song about anyway?: Automatic classification of subject using user interpretations and lyrics
Metadata research for music digital libraries has traditionally focused on genre. Despite its potential for improving the ability of users to better search and browse music collections, music subject metadata is an unexplored area. The objective of this study is to expand the scope of music metadata research, in particular, by exploring music subject classification based on user interpretations of music. Furthermore, we compare this previously unexplored form of user data to lyrics at subject prediction tasks. In our experiment, we use datasets consisting of 900 songs annotated with user interpretations. To determine the significance of performance differences between the two sources, we applied Friedman's ANOVA test on the classification accuracies. The results show that user-generated interpretations are significantly more useful than lyrics as classification features (p <; 0.05). The findings support the possibility of exploiting various existing sources for subject metadata enrichment in music digital libraries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信