{"title":"ZnO纳米花型电阻式传感器的酒精传感性能比较研究","authors":"N. Banerjee, Sunipa Roy","doi":"10.1109/EDCT.2018.8405080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative study on alcohol sensing performance of ZnO nano-flowers is reported in this paper. Chemical bath deposition technique was employed to develop the nanostructure on a sol-gel grown seed layer deposited on SiO2 substrate using Zinc Acetate Dihydrate and Hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) precursors in DI water in the mass ratio of 1:3. After structural (XRD, FESEM) characterizations, the sensor was tested for sensing alcohol (methanol and ethanol) vapor at 250°C in dynamic range of 100 to 700 ppm. The sensor showed high response magnitude ~85.45% with ~9.6 sec response time at methanol vapor but while obtaining ~54.90% response magnitude at ethanol vapor with very low response time 2.83 sec in 700 ppm at a temperature of 250°C.","PeriodicalId":6507,"journal":{"name":"2018 Emerging Trends in Electronic Devices and Computational Techniques (EDCT)","volume":"41 12","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alcohol sensing performance of ZnO nano-flower based resistive sensor: Comparative study\",\"authors\":\"N. Banerjee, Sunipa Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDCT.2018.8405080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparative study on alcohol sensing performance of ZnO nano-flowers is reported in this paper. Chemical bath deposition technique was employed to develop the nanostructure on a sol-gel grown seed layer deposited on SiO2 substrate using Zinc Acetate Dihydrate and Hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) precursors in DI water in the mass ratio of 1:3. After structural (XRD, FESEM) characterizations, the sensor was tested for sensing alcohol (methanol and ethanol) vapor at 250°C in dynamic range of 100 to 700 ppm. The sensor showed high response magnitude ~85.45% with ~9.6 sec response time at methanol vapor but while obtaining ~54.90% response magnitude at ethanol vapor with very low response time 2.83 sec in 700 ppm at a temperature of 250°C.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Emerging Trends in Electronic Devices and Computational Techniques (EDCT)\",\"volume\":\"41 12\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Emerging Trends in Electronic Devices and Computational Techniques (EDCT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDCT.2018.8405080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Emerging Trends in Electronic Devices and Computational Techniques (EDCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDCT.2018.8405080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Alcohol sensing performance of ZnO nano-flower based resistive sensor: Comparative study
A comparative study on alcohol sensing performance of ZnO nano-flowers is reported in this paper. Chemical bath deposition technique was employed to develop the nanostructure on a sol-gel grown seed layer deposited on SiO2 substrate using Zinc Acetate Dihydrate and Hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) precursors in DI water in the mass ratio of 1:3. After structural (XRD, FESEM) characterizations, the sensor was tested for sensing alcohol (methanol and ethanol) vapor at 250°C in dynamic range of 100 to 700 ppm. The sensor showed high response magnitude ~85.45% with ~9.6 sec response time at methanol vapor but while obtaining ~54.90% response magnitude at ethanol vapor with very low response time 2.83 sec in 700 ppm at a temperature of 250°C.