工作的权利

IF 0.2 4区 文学 Q4 Arts and Humanities
Jenna Krajeski, Chloe Cushman
{"title":"工作的权利","authors":"Jenna Krajeski, Chloe Cushman","doi":"10.4337/9781789903645.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"...The \"right to work\" is a conception invented by Fourier. But in his theory it can be realized only in the phalanstery.* It presupposes, therefore, the acceptance of this form of organization. The Fourierists, peace loving philistines of the Democraci« Pacifique, as their paper was called, spread this conception just because of its innocuous sound. As a result of their absolute theoretical unclearness, the Parisian workers took over this slogan. It seemed so practical, so non-utopian, so immediately realizable. The government put it into practice in the only way in which capitalism was able to, in senseless national public works. In the same way, the \"right to work\" was put into action during the cotton crisis of 1861-4 in Lancashire, England, through municipal public works. And in Germany, it is realized in the hunger and cudgelling working colonies for which the philistine is now enthusiastic. As a »«parât« demand the \"right to work\" cannot possibly be realized in any other way. The granting of this demand by capitalist societycan be accomplished only within its own conditions of existence. If the right to work is demanded from capitalism, it can only be under these specified conditions and thus what is actually being demanded are national public works, work-houses, and worker colonies. Should, however, the slogan be meant as an indirect demand for the overturn of the capitalist mode of production, then,considering the state of the movement today, it represents a cowardly regression, a concession to the \"socialist laws\"** — a phrase which can have no other purpose than to make the workers confused and unclear about the tasks which they must strive for and the conditions under which these tasks can alone be achieved...\".","PeriodicalId":42372,"journal":{"name":"VIRGINIA QUARTERLY REVIEW","volume":"21 1","pages":"38 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Right to Work\",\"authors\":\"Jenna Krajeski, Chloe Cushman\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781789903645.00016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"...The \\\"right to work\\\" is a conception invented by Fourier. But in his theory it can be realized only in the phalanstery.* It presupposes, therefore, the acceptance of this form of organization. The Fourierists, peace loving philistines of the Democraci« Pacifique, as their paper was called, spread this conception just because of its innocuous sound. As a result of their absolute theoretical unclearness, the Parisian workers took over this slogan. It seemed so practical, so non-utopian, so immediately realizable. The government put it into practice in the only way in which capitalism was able to, in senseless national public works. In the same way, the \\\"right to work\\\" was put into action during the cotton crisis of 1861-4 in Lancashire, England, through municipal public works. And in Germany, it is realized in the hunger and cudgelling working colonies for which the philistine is now enthusiastic. As a »«parât« demand the \\\"right to work\\\" cannot possibly be realized in any other way. The granting of this demand by capitalist societycan be accomplished only within its own conditions of existence. If the right to work is demanded from capitalism, it can only be under these specified conditions and thus what is actually being demanded are national public works, work-houses, and worker colonies. Should, however, the slogan be meant as an indirect demand for the overturn of the capitalist mode of production, then,considering the state of the movement today, it represents a cowardly regression, a concession to the \\\"socialist laws\\\"** — a phrase which can have no other purpose than to make the workers confused and unclear about the tasks which they must strive for and the conditions under which these tasks can alone be achieved...\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":42372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VIRGINIA QUARTERLY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VIRGINIA QUARTERLY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903645.00016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIRGINIA QUARTERLY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903645.00016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“…“工作权”是傅立叶提出的概念。但在他的理论中,这只能在方阵中实现。因此,它以接受这种组织形式为先决条件。傅立叶主义者——他们的论文被称为“民主太平洋”(Democraci«pacificque)的爱好和平的庸人——传播这种观点,仅仅是因为它听起来无害。由于在理论上完全不清楚,巴黎工人采纳了这个口号。它看起来是那么实际,那么非乌托邦,那么马上就能实现。政府在毫无意义的国家公共工程中,以资本主义所能做到的唯一方式将其付诸实践。同样,“工作权”在1861- 1841年英国兰开夏郡的棉花危机期间,也通过市政公共工程付诸实施。而在德国,这一点是在市侩现在所热衷的挨饿和挨打的劳动殖民地中实现的。作为一个“part”要求,“工作权利”不可能以任何其他方式实现。资本主义社会要满足这种要求,只有在它自己的生存条件下才能实现。如果向资本主义要求工作的权利,那只能是在这些特定的条件下,因此实际上被要求的是国家公共工程、济贫院和工人殖民地。但是,如果把这个口号当作推翻资本主义生产方式的间接要求,那么,考虑到今天运动的状况,它就是一种怯懦的退步,是对“社会主义规律”的让步——这句话除了使工人对他们必须争取的任务和只有在什么条件下才能实现这些任务之外,别无其他目的……”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Right to Work
"...The "right to work" is a conception invented by Fourier. But in his theory it can be realized only in the phalanstery.* It presupposes, therefore, the acceptance of this form of organization. The Fourierists, peace loving philistines of the Democraci« Pacifique, as their paper was called, spread this conception just because of its innocuous sound. As a result of their absolute theoretical unclearness, the Parisian workers took over this slogan. It seemed so practical, so non-utopian, so immediately realizable. The government put it into practice in the only way in which capitalism was able to, in senseless national public works. In the same way, the "right to work" was put into action during the cotton crisis of 1861-4 in Lancashire, England, through municipal public works. And in Germany, it is realized in the hunger and cudgelling working colonies for which the philistine is now enthusiastic. As a »«parât« demand the "right to work" cannot possibly be realized in any other way. The granting of this demand by capitalist societycan be accomplished only within its own conditions of existence. If the right to work is demanded from capitalism, it can only be under these specified conditions and thus what is actually being demanded are national public works, work-houses, and worker colonies. Should, however, the slogan be meant as an indirect demand for the overturn of the capitalist mode of production, then,considering the state of the movement today, it represents a cowardly regression, a concession to the "socialist laws"** — a phrase which can have no other purpose than to make the workers confused and unclear about the tasks which they must strive for and the conditions under which these tasks can alone be achieved...".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VIRGINIA QUARTERLY REVIEW
VIRGINIA QUARTERLY REVIEW LITERARY REVIEWS-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Though Charlottesville and Albemarle County were still on the fringes of the frontier when Thomas Jefferson founded his University of Virginia in 1819, he saw rising here nothing less than "a bulwark for the human mind in this hemisphere." In 1915, UVa president Edwin A. Alderman declared publicly that he was seeking to create a university publication that could be "an organ of liberal opinion . . . solidly based, thoughtfully and wisely managed and controlled, not seeking to give news, but to become a great serious publication wherein shall be reflected the calm thought of the best men."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信