家庭验孕棒在目标用户手中

Jackie Boxer, Sarah Weddell, David Broomhead, C. Hogg, Sarah Johnson
{"title":"家庭验孕棒在目标用户手中","authors":"Jackie Boxer, Sarah Weddell, David Broomhead, C. Hogg, Sarah Johnson","doi":"10.1080/15321819.2019.1671861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were to investigate the usability and performance of seven visual home pregnancy tests, available in Europe. Part one of the study was home-based and involved volunteers testing a selection of four home pregnancy tests. The tests used and order of use were randomized. Part two, performed at a study site, involved volunteers reading and interpreting the results of the same selection of home pregnancy tests used in part one, but using urine standards representing early pregnancy (25 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) or a ‘not pregnant’ (0 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) sample. The volunteers completed a questionnaire after each test in both parts. Three of the seven tests met their accuracy/reliability claims: tests A (99.8%), B (100%), and F (97.6%) (not statistically different from the claimed 99% accuracy). The remaining four tests had accuracies/reliabilities of <99% at 81.6% (C), 89.0% (E), 92.5% (D), and 95.9% (G), respectively. Test A was the highest-rated test for each attribute tested in both settings. Test D was ranked the lowest in part one and test C was ranked lowest overall for part two. Home pregnancy tests vary in performance and usability, therefore requiring better standardization and performance evaluation in Europe. Clinical Trials Reference Number: NCT03589534","PeriodicalId":15987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home pregnancy tests in the hands of the intended user\",\"authors\":\"Jackie Boxer, Sarah Weddell, David Broomhead, C. Hogg, Sarah Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15321819.2019.1671861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were to investigate the usability and performance of seven visual home pregnancy tests, available in Europe. Part one of the study was home-based and involved volunteers testing a selection of four home pregnancy tests. The tests used and order of use were randomized. Part two, performed at a study site, involved volunteers reading and interpreting the results of the same selection of home pregnancy tests used in part one, but using urine standards representing early pregnancy (25 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) or a ‘not pregnant’ (0 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) sample. The volunteers completed a questionnaire after each test in both parts. Three of the seven tests met their accuracy/reliability claims: tests A (99.8%), B (100%), and F (97.6%) (not statistically different from the claimed 99% accuracy). The remaining four tests had accuracies/reliabilities of <99% at 81.6% (C), 89.0% (E), 92.5% (D), and 95.9% (G), respectively. Test A was the highest-rated test for each attribute tested in both settings. Test D was ranked the lowest in part one and test C was ranked lowest overall for part two. Home pregnancy tests vary in performance and usability, therefore requiring better standardization and performance evaluation in Europe. Clinical Trials Reference Number: NCT03589534\",\"PeriodicalId\":15987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15321819.2019.1671861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15321819.2019.1671861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要:本研究的目的是调查欧洲七种视觉家用妊娠试验的可用性和性能。研究的第一部分以家庭为基础,志愿者们选择四种家庭验孕棒进行测试。使用的试验和使用顺序是随机的。第二部分在研究现场进行,志愿者阅读和解释与第一部分相同的家庭妊娠试验选择的结果,但使用代表早期妊娠的尿液标准(25 mIU/mL人绒毛膜促性腺激素)或“未怀孕”(0 mIU/mL人绒毛膜促性腺激素)样本。志愿者们在两个部分的每次测试后都要完成一份问卷。七个测试中有三个符合其准确性/可靠性声明:测试A (99.8%), B(100%)和F(97.6%)(与声称的99%准确性没有统计学差异)。其余4项检验的准确性/信度分别为81.6% (C)、89.0% (E)、92.5% (D)和95.9% (G),均<99%。测试A是在两种设置中测试的每个属性的最高评级测试。测试D在第一部分中排名最低,测试C在第二部分中排名最低。家庭验孕试纸的性能和可用性各不相同,因此在欧洲需要更好的标准化和性能评估。临床试验参考号:NCT03589534
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home pregnancy tests in the hands of the intended user
ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were to investigate the usability and performance of seven visual home pregnancy tests, available in Europe. Part one of the study was home-based and involved volunteers testing a selection of four home pregnancy tests. The tests used and order of use were randomized. Part two, performed at a study site, involved volunteers reading and interpreting the results of the same selection of home pregnancy tests used in part one, but using urine standards representing early pregnancy (25 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) or a ‘not pregnant’ (0 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) sample. The volunteers completed a questionnaire after each test in both parts. Three of the seven tests met their accuracy/reliability claims: tests A (99.8%), B (100%), and F (97.6%) (not statistically different from the claimed 99% accuracy). The remaining four tests had accuracies/reliabilities of <99% at 81.6% (C), 89.0% (E), 92.5% (D), and 95.9% (G), respectively. Test A was the highest-rated test for each attribute tested in both settings. Test D was ranked the lowest in part one and test C was ranked lowest overall for part two. Home pregnancy tests vary in performance and usability, therefore requiring better standardization and performance evaluation in Europe. Clinical Trials Reference Number: NCT03589534
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信