发掘未记录:布里克斯顿的记忆、历史和城市抹去

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 Q3 Arts and Humanities
Zhang, Fox
{"title":"发掘未记录:布里克斯顿的记忆、历史和城市抹去","authors":"Zhang, Fox","doi":"10.5749/futuante.17.2.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In 2015, the independent businesses housed in the railway arches of Brixton Station were served eviction notices and forced to abandon their livelihoods so their spaces could be refurbished. In response, we set out to map the history of their inhabitants; but what we discovered was that the market in the Brixton Arches has existed largely within an official void. None of its history centrally stored or preserved, nor has it been consistently documented by Lambeth Council or the local archives; there is not even an exhaustive list of businesses registered to the arches over the last 150 years. This article explores the role that preservation politics plays in (re)shaping collective memory and public consciousness, and critiques how heritage politics, the production of memory and preservation practices are dominated by a particular philosophical understanding of memory and history as monolithic, stable and definable. Drawing on the work of scholars from minoritized communities, we propose that it is necessary to push back against normative frameworks, and instead begin from the complexities of difference. Through the concept of co-constitution we propose a framework for creating and preserving spaces that encompass the multiplicity of perspectives, identities, and subjectivities of their inhabitants.","PeriodicalId":53609,"journal":{"name":"Future Anterior","volume":"20 2","pages":"110 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unearthing the Unrecorded: Memory, History, and Urban Erasure in Brixton\",\"authors\":\"Zhang, Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/futuante.17.2.0095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In 2015, the independent businesses housed in the railway arches of Brixton Station were served eviction notices and forced to abandon their livelihoods so their spaces could be refurbished. In response, we set out to map the history of their inhabitants; but what we discovered was that the market in the Brixton Arches has existed largely within an official void. None of its history centrally stored or preserved, nor has it been consistently documented by Lambeth Council or the local archives; there is not even an exhaustive list of businesses registered to the arches over the last 150 years. This article explores the role that preservation politics plays in (re)shaping collective memory and public consciousness, and critiques how heritage politics, the production of memory and preservation practices are dominated by a particular philosophical understanding of memory and history as monolithic, stable and definable. Drawing on the work of scholars from minoritized communities, we propose that it is necessary to push back against normative frameworks, and instead begin from the complexities of difference. Through the concept of co-constitution we propose a framework for creating and preserving spaces that encompass the multiplicity of perspectives, identities, and subjectivities of their inhabitants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Anterior\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"110 - 94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Anterior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.17.2.0095\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Anterior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.17.2.0095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:2015年,位于布里克斯顿车站铁路拱门内的独立企业接到了驱逐通知,被迫放弃生计,以便对其空间进行翻新。作为回应,我们开始绘制他们居民的历史;但我们发现,布里克斯顿拱门的市场在很大程度上存在于官方空白之中。它的历史没有集中存储或保存,也没有被兰贝斯委员会或当地档案馆一致记录;在过去的150年里,甚至没有一份在拱门注册的企业的详尽名单。本文探讨了保护政治在(重新)塑造集体记忆和公众意识方面所起的作用,并批评了遗产政治、记忆的生产和保护实践是如何被对记忆和历史的单一、稳定和可定义的特定哲学理解所主导的。借鉴少数群体学者的工作,我们建议有必要推翻规范框架,而是从差异的复杂性开始。通过共同构成的概念,我们提出了一个框架来创造和保护空间,这些空间包含了居民的多种观点、身份和主体性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unearthing the Unrecorded: Memory, History, and Urban Erasure in Brixton
Abstract:In 2015, the independent businesses housed in the railway arches of Brixton Station were served eviction notices and forced to abandon their livelihoods so their spaces could be refurbished. In response, we set out to map the history of their inhabitants; but what we discovered was that the market in the Brixton Arches has existed largely within an official void. None of its history centrally stored or preserved, nor has it been consistently documented by Lambeth Council or the local archives; there is not even an exhaustive list of businesses registered to the arches over the last 150 years. This article explores the role that preservation politics plays in (re)shaping collective memory and public consciousness, and critiques how heritage politics, the production of memory and preservation practices are dominated by a particular philosophical understanding of memory and history as monolithic, stable and definable. Drawing on the work of scholars from minoritized communities, we propose that it is necessary to push back against normative frameworks, and instead begin from the complexities of difference. Through the concept of co-constitution we propose a framework for creating and preserving spaces that encompass the multiplicity of perspectives, identities, and subjectivities of their inhabitants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Anterior
Future Anterior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信