A SadhuAdwitya, M. Wibowo, S. Syafrudin
{"title":"ANALISA PERBEDAAN LPS (LAST PLANNER SYSTEM) DENGAN SISTEM KONVENSIONAL SERTA PENGARUH CPM DAN BAR CHART PADA LPS","authors":"A SadhuAdwitya, M. Wibowo, S. Syafrudin","doi":"10.32497/WAHANATS.V25I1.1919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two generally method / tools which used in project construction management system in Indonesia and the name are CPM (critical part method) or network planning and Bar Chart. The system used general method called conventional management system. Nowadays, was appeared one of a new system which seldom to applied in Indonesia, it is called LPS (last planner system). This research, researcher doing analyzed the differences between LPS and conventional management system. The result which obtained in this research are LPS dominated to accentuates team collaborative in the scheduling planning, resource allocation, control and enhance of work productivity, issue solved, regularly scheduling planning. Conventional management system more rely on the way CPM and Bar Chart working in that system with project manager decision. Planning of the schedule in this system doing by scheduling team. rescheduling in this system is not routine, it’s depend by construction progress. CPM and Bar Chart methods is influence on LPS. The both of methods was appeared in master scheduling, look a head scheduling, weekly work planning, shielding production, workable back log, percent plan completed and reliable promise process","PeriodicalId":34836,"journal":{"name":"Prokons","volume":"181 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prokons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32497/WAHANATS.V25I1.1919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度尼西亚的项目建设管理系统中使用的两种常用方法/工具是CPM(关键部分方法)或网络规划和条形图。本系统采用的一般方法称为常规管理系统。目前,印度尼西亚出现了一种很少应用的新系统,它被称为LPS(最后规划师系统)。本研究中,研究者分析了LPS与传统管理体系的差异。本研究的结果是,以LPS为主导,在调度计划、资源分配、控制和提高工作效率、问题解决、定期调度计划等方面加强团队协作。传统的管理系统更多地依赖于CPM和柱状图的工作方式,该系统与项目经理的决策。在这个系统中,计划的进度是由调度团队来完成的。在这个系统中,重新调度不是常规的,它取决于施工进度。CPM和柱状图方法对LPS的影响。这两种方法分别出现在主调度、看头调度、周工作计划、屏蔽生产、可工作回排、计划完成率和可靠承诺过程中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISA PERBEDAAN LPS (LAST PLANNER SYSTEM) DENGAN SISTEM KONVENSIONAL SERTA PENGARUH CPM DAN BAR CHART PADA LPS
Two generally method / tools which used in project construction management system in Indonesia and the name are CPM (critical part method) or network planning and Bar Chart. The system used general method called conventional management system. Nowadays, was appeared one of a new system which seldom to applied in Indonesia, it is called LPS (last planner system). This research, researcher doing analyzed the differences between LPS and conventional management system. The result which obtained in this research are LPS dominated to accentuates team collaborative in the scheduling planning, resource allocation, control and enhance of work productivity, issue solved, regularly scheduling planning. Conventional management system more rely on the way CPM and Bar Chart working in that system with project manager decision. Planning of the schedule in this system doing by scheduling team. rescheduling in this system is not routine, it’s depend by construction progress. CPM and Bar Chart methods is influence on LPS. The both of methods was appeared in master scheduling, look a head scheduling, weekly work planning, shielding production, workable back log, percent plan completed and reliable promise process
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信