{"title":"在两个不确定作者的悲惨片段上:西诺普的提奥奇尼斯还是欧里庇德斯?","authors":"F. Lupi","doi":"10.14601/PROMETHEUS-21221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the disputed authorship of two iambic fragments, frr. trag. adesp. 284, 394 N. 2 = Diog. Sin. frr. dub. 4-5 Sn.-K. On account of lexical, stylistic, and content affinities especially, the attribution to Euripides’ Telephus , among other Euripidean fragmentary dramas, is proposed.","PeriodicalId":38494,"journal":{"name":"Prometheus (Italy)","volume":"2 4","pages":"67-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Su due frammenti tragici di autore incerto: Diogene di Sinope o Euripide?\",\"authors\":\"F. Lupi\",\"doi\":\"10.14601/PROMETHEUS-21221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with the disputed authorship of two iambic fragments, frr. trag. adesp. 284, 394 N. 2 = Diog. Sin. frr. dub. 4-5 Sn.-K. On account of lexical, stylistic, and content affinities especially, the attribution to Euripides’ Telephus , among other Euripidean fragmentary dramas, is proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prometheus (Italy)\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"67-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prometheus (Italy)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14601/PROMETHEUS-21221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prometheus (Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14601/PROMETHEUS-21221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文讨论了两个有争议的抑扬格片段的作者,第一个。trag。adesp。284, 394 N. 2 = Diog。罪。frr。配音。4 - 5 Sn.-K。特别是在词汇、文体和内容上的相似性,我们认为这是欧里庇德斯的《忒勒福斯》和其他欧里庇德斯的片段剧的产物。
Su due frammenti tragici di autore incerto: Diogene di Sinope o Euripide?
The paper deals with the disputed authorship of two iambic fragments, frr. trag. adesp. 284, 394 N. 2 = Diog. Sin. frr. dub. 4-5 Sn.-K. On account of lexical, stylistic, and content affinities especially, the attribution to Euripides’ Telephus , among other Euripidean fragmentary dramas, is proposed.