人工耳蜗后鼓室切开入路圆窗可及性的变化

PAFMJ Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v1i1.6039
Uzair Mushahid, Sayed Nusrat Raza, Muhammad Ali, Shoaib Ahmed, Abdul Hakim, Shakeel Ahmed
{"title":"人工耳蜗后鼓室切开入路圆窗可及性的变化","authors":"Uzair Mushahid, Sayed Nusrat Raza, Muhammad Ali, Shoaib Ahmed, Abdul Hakim, Shakeel Ahmed","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v1i1.6039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To apply the St Thomas’ Hospital (STH) classification of round window type, in a Pakistani pediatric population undergoing cochlear implantation, and rate the inter observer variability of applying this classification. \nStudy Design: Cross sectional study. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Apr 2019 to Dec 2020. \nMethodology: Patients were examined per-operatively by a panel of four surgeons after \"optimal\" posterior tympanotomy for round window variations, as per STH classification of approachability of RWM. The observations of the four surgeons were recorded and interobserver variation was assessed and analyzed. \nResults: A total of 100 patients were operated, 45 females and 55 males. Mean age was 3.8 years. There was minimal inter observer variability with regards to round window type and extent of \"optimal\" posterior tympanotomy. Three patients had type I, 76 had type IIA, 15 had type IIB and 6 patients had type III. Round window insertion/membranous cochleostomy was possible in 70 patients, whereas the rest require extended round window approach or bony cochleostomy. \nConclusion: The STH classification is a useful predictor of route of CI electrode insertion and most patients can undergo RW insertion with confidence based on minimal variation between surgeons when applying the STH classification as well as when deciding the extent of surgical exposure.","PeriodicalId":19982,"journal":{"name":"PAFMJ","volume":"19 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VARIATIONS IN ACCESSIBILITY OF ROUND WINDOW VIA POSTERIOR TYMPANOTOMY APPROACH IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT SURGERY\",\"authors\":\"Uzair Mushahid, Sayed Nusrat Raza, Muhammad Ali, Shoaib Ahmed, Abdul Hakim, Shakeel Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.51253/pafmj.v1i1.6039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To apply the St Thomas’ Hospital (STH) classification of round window type, in a Pakistani pediatric population undergoing cochlear implantation, and rate the inter observer variability of applying this classification. \\nStudy Design: Cross sectional study. \\nPlace and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Apr 2019 to Dec 2020. \\nMethodology: Patients were examined per-operatively by a panel of four surgeons after \\\"optimal\\\" posterior tympanotomy for round window variations, as per STH classification of approachability of RWM. The observations of the four surgeons were recorded and interobserver variation was assessed and analyzed. \\nResults: A total of 100 patients were operated, 45 females and 55 males. Mean age was 3.8 years. There was minimal inter observer variability with regards to round window type and extent of \\\"optimal\\\" posterior tympanotomy. Three patients had type I, 76 had type IIA, 15 had type IIB and 6 patients had type III. Round window insertion/membranous cochleostomy was possible in 70 patients, whereas the rest require extended round window approach or bony cochleostomy. \\nConclusion: The STH classification is a useful predictor of route of CI electrode insertion and most patients can undergo RW insertion with confidence based on minimal variation between surgeons when applying the STH classification as well as when deciding the extent of surgical exposure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PAFMJ\",\"volume\":\"19 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PAFMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v1i1.6039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAFMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v1i1.6039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用圣托马斯医院(STH)的圆窗型分类在巴基斯坦接受人工耳蜗植入的儿童人群中,并评价应用该分类的观察者间变异性。研究设计:横断面研究。学习地点和时间:拉瓦尔品第联合军队医院,2019年4月至2020年12月。方法:根据RWM的可接近性的STH分类,在“最佳”后鼓室切开术后,由四名外科医生组成的小组对患者进行术前检查。记录四位外科医生的观察结果,并评估和分析观察者之间的差异。结果:共手术100例,其中女性45例,男性55例。平均年龄3.8岁。关于圆形窗口类型和“最佳”后鼓室切开术的范围,观察者之间的差异最小。I型3例,IIA型76例,IIB型15例,III型6例。70例患者可行圆窗置入/膜性耳蜗造口术,其余患者需行扩大圆窗入路或骨性耳蜗造口术。结论:STH分类是CI电极插入路径的有效预测指标,大多数患者在采用STH分类和确定手术暴露程度时,由于外科医生之间的差异很小,可以放心地进行RW插入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
VARIATIONS IN ACCESSIBILITY OF ROUND WINDOW VIA POSTERIOR TYMPANOTOMY APPROACH IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT SURGERY
Objective: To apply the St Thomas’ Hospital (STH) classification of round window type, in a Pakistani pediatric population undergoing cochlear implantation, and rate the inter observer variability of applying this classification. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Apr 2019 to Dec 2020. Methodology: Patients were examined per-operatively by a panel of four surgeons after "optimal" posterior tympanotomy for round window variations, as per STH classification of approachability of RWM. The observations of the four surgeons were recorded and interobserver variation was assessed and analyzed. Results: A total of 100 patients were operated, 45 females and 55 males. Mean age was 3.8 years. There was minimal inter observer variability with regards to round window type and extent of "optimal" posterior tympanotomy. Three patients had type I, 76 had type IIA, 15 had type IIB and 6 patients had type III. Round window insertion/membranous cochleostomy was possible in 70 patients, whereas the rest require extended round window approach or bony cochleostomy. Conclusion: The STH classification is a useful predictor of route of CI electrode insertion and most patients can undergo RW insertion with confidence based on minimal variation between surgeons when applying the STH classification as well as when deciding the extent of surgical exposure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信