德国职业培训较低阶段的受训者的学术技能和工作准备——是否有普遍的标准?

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christina Bastges-Lienshöft, Rüdiger Bach, B. Schmidt, A. Schabmann
{"title":"德国职业培训较低阶段的受训者的学术技能和工作准备——是否有普遍的标准?","authors":"Christina Bastges-Lienshöft, Rüdiger Bach, B. Schmidt, A. Schabmann","doi":"10.1080/13636820.2021.1955402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Criteria lists of academic skills are widely used to assess the work readiness of people who are looking to enter or re-enter the apprenticeship market. These instruments represent a particular hurdle in the path to vocational training for low-skilled would-be trainees. We investigate the validity of one such list used in Germany. As different workplaces have diverse requirements, we question whether the same criteria hold for various professions. The study surveyed 538 trainees enrolled in vocational training programmes in eight different professions. Participants were asked about the requirements of their professions with respect to the minimum standards (as specified in the German Catalogue of Criteria for Apprenticeship Readiness) for work readiness. The results showed that the trainees consider the requirements during training to be lower than the minimum standards specified in the German Catalogue of Criteria for Apprenticeship Readiness and that substantial heterogeneity in requirements exists both between and within professions. We argue that criteria lists, which are also used in other countries in similar ways, should be treated with caution, as they might not be able to predict would-be trainees’ readiness to successfully complete an apprenticeship programme due to enormous variability in job requirements.","PeriodicalId":46718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Education and Training","volume":"40 4","pages":"697 - 721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic skills and work readiness among trainees in the lower segment of vocational training in Germany – are there universal criteria?\",\"authors\":\"Christina Bastges-Lienshöft, Rüdiger Bach, B. Schmidt, A. Schabmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13636820.2021.1955402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Criteria lists of academic skills are widely used to assess the work readiness of people who are looking to enter or re-enter the apprenticeship market. These instruments represent a particular hurdle in the path to vocational training for low-skilled would-be trainees. We investigate the validity of one such list used in Germany. As different workplaces have diverse requirements, we question whether the same criteria hold for various professions. The study surveyed 538 trainees enrolled in vocational training programmes in eight different professions. Participants were asked about the requirements of their professions with respect to the minimum standards (as specified in the German Catalogue of Criteria for Apprenticeship Readiness) for work readiness. The results showed that the trainees consider the requirements during training to be lower than the minimum standards specified in the German Catalogue of Criteria for Apprenticeship Readiness and that substantial heterogeneity in requirements exists both between and within professions. We argue that criteria lists, which are also used in other countries in similar ways, should be treated with caution, as they might not be able to predict would-be trainees’ readiness to successfully complete an apprenticeship programme due to enormous variability in job requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vocational Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"697 - 721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vocational Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1955402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1955402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术技能的标准列表被广泛用于评估那些希望进入或重新进入学徒市场的人的工作准备。这些工具是低技能准学员获得职业培训道路上的一个特别障碍。我们调查了在德国使用的一个这样的列表的有效性。由于不同的工作场所有不同的要求,我们质疑同样的标准是否适用于不同的职业。这项研究调查了参加职业培训计划的538名学员,他们来自8个不同的行业。与会者被问及他们的专业对工作准备的最低标准(如《德国学徒准备标准目录》中规定的)的要求。结果表明,受训者认为培训期间的要求低于德国学徒准备标准目录中规定的最低标准,并且职业之间和职业内部的要求存在实质性的异质性。我们认为,标准清单(在其他国家也以类似的方式使用)应该谨慎对待,因为由于工作要求的巨大差异,它们可能无法预测潜在受训人员是否准备好成功完成学徒计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Academic skills and work readiness among trainees in the lower segment of vocational training in Germany – are there universal criteria?
ABSTRACT Criteria lists of academic skills are widely used to assess the work readiness of people who are looking to enter or re-enter the apprenticeship market. These instruments represent a particular hurdle in the path to vocational training for low-skilled would-be trainees. We investigate the validity of one such list used in Germany. As different workplaces have diverse requirements, we question whether the same criteria hold for various professions. The study surveyed 538 trainees enrolled in vocational training programmes in eight different professions. Participants were asked about the requirements of their professions with respect to the minimum standards (as specified in the German Catalogue of Criteria for Apprenticeship Readiness) for work readiness. The results showed that the trainees consider the requirements during training to be lower than the minimum standards specified in the German Catalogue of Criteria for Apprenticeship Readiness and that substantial heterogeneity in requirements exists both between and within professions. We argue that criteria lists, which are also used in other countries in similar ways, should be treated with caution, as they might not be able to predict would-be trainees’ readiness to successfully complete an apprenticeship programme due to enormous variability in job requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Journal of Vocational Education and Training EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vocational Education and Training is a peer-reviewed international journal which welcomes submissions involving a critical discussion of policy and practice, as well as contributions to conceptual and theoretical developments in the field. It includes articles based on empirical research and analysis (quantitative, qualitative and mixed method) and welcomes papers from a wide range of disciplinary and inter-disciplinary perspectives. The journal embraces the broad range of settings and ways in which vocational and professional learning takes place and, hence, is not restricted by institutional boundaries or structures in relation to national systems of education and training. It is interested in the study of curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment, as well as economic, cultural and political aspects related to the role of vocational and professional education and training in society. When submitting papers for consideration, the journal encourages authors to consider and engage with debates concerning issues relevant to the focus of their work that have been previously published in the journal. The journal hosts a biennial international conference to provide a forum for researchers to debate and gain feedback on their work, and to encourage comparative analysis and international collaboration. From the first issue of Volume 48, 1996, the journal changed its title from The Vocational Aspect of Education to Journal of Vocational Education and Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信