{"title":"冬季和春季应用Lorsban防治烟草Wikeworms, 1992;","authors":"E. Lampert, A. Stephenson","doi":"10.1093/iat/18.1.282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Plots were established at the Border Belt Tobacco Research Station near Whiteville, NC, on 3 Mar. Plots were 22 plants long (ca 13.7 m) and 4 rows wide (1.2 m between rows) and were arranged according to a randomized complete-block design having 8 treatments and 4 blocks. The predominant soil type was Goldsboro fine sandy loam (pH 6.5). Winter treatments were made on 3 Mar and spring treatments were made on 23 Apr. Sprays were applied using a CO2-powered sprayer fitted with 5, 8004 Spraying Systems flat-fan nozzles (20 inches apart) on a 80 inch boom at 30 psi and a delivery rate of 25 gal/acre. All treatments were incorporated via ridging immediately after application. Tobacco was transplanted on 24 Apr. Soil moisture was excellent at the time of transplanting. Twenty-six days after transplanting, 10 consecutive plants from row 2 in each plot were gently pulled from the soil. The roots and underground portions of the stems were visually examined and rated for wireworm damage as follows: 0 = no damage; 1 = feeding scars on root surface; 2 = feeding reaching pith with tunneling < 1 cm; 3 = pit tunneling from 1-5 cm; 4 = pith tunneling > 5 cm; and 5 = dead plant. Using this data, the avg wireworm rating and the proportion of wireworm damaged plants was calculated. Data were subjected to ANOVA and WD, K = 100. Proportion of plants infested was transformed to arcsine √ proportion before ANOVA.","PeriodicalId":13691,"journal":{"name":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","volume":"165 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control of Tobacco Wikeworms with Winter and Spring Applications of Lorsban, 1992:\",\"authors\":\"E. Lampert, A. Stephenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/iat/18.1.282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Plots were established at the Border Belt Tobacco Research Station near Whiteville, NC, on 3 Mar. Plots were 22 plants long (ca 13.7 m) and 4 rows wide (1.2 m between rows) and were arranged according to a randomized complete-block design having 8 treatments and 4 blocks. The predominant soil type was Goldsboro fine sandy loam (pH 6.5). Winter treatments were made on 3 Mar and spring treatments were made on 23 Apr. Sprays were applied using a CO2-powered sprayer fitted with 5, 8004 Spraying Systems flat-fan nozzles (20 inches apart) on a 80 inch boom at 30 psi and a delivery rate of 25 gal/acre. All treatments were incorporated via ridging immediately after application. Tobacco was transplanted on 24 Apr. Soil moisture was excellent at the time of transplanting. Twenty-six days after transplanting, 10 consecutive plants from row 2 in each plot were gently pulled from the soil. The roots and underground portions of the stems were visually examined and rated for wireworm damage as follows: 0 = no damage; 1 = feeding scars on root surface; 2 = feeding reaching pith with tunneling < 1 cm; 3 = pit tunneling from 1-5 cm; 4 = pith tunneling > 5 cm; and 5 = dead plant. Using this data, the avg wireworm rating and the proportion of wireworm damaged plants was calculated. Data were subjected to ANOVA and WD, K = 100. Proportion of plants infested was transformed to arcsine √ proportion before ANOVA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests\",\"volume\":\"165 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Control of Tobacco Wikeworms with Winter and Spring Applications of Lorsban, 1992:
Plots were established at the Border Belt Tobacco Research Station near Whiteville, NC, on 3 Mar. Plots were 22 plants long (ca 13.7 m) and 4 rows wide (1.2 m between rows) and were arranged according to a randomized complete-block design having 8 treatments and 4 blocks. The predominant soil type was Goldsboro fine sandy loam (pH 6.5). Winter treatments were made on 3 Mar and spring treatments were made on 23 Apr. Sprays were applied using a CO2-powered sprayer fitted with 5, 8004 Spraying Systems flat-fan nozzles (20 inches apart) on a 80 inch boom at 30 psi and a delivery rate of 25 gal/acre. All treatments were incorporated via ridging immediately after application. Tobacco was transplanted on 24 Apr. Soil moisture was excellent at the time of transplanting. Twenty-six days after transplanting, 10 consecutive plants from row 2 in each plot were gently pulled from the soil. The roots and underground portions of the stems were visually examined and rated for wireworm damage as follows: 0 = no damage; 1 = feeding scars on root surface; 2 = feeding reaching pith with tunneling < 1 cm; 3 = pit tunneling from 1-5 cm; 4 = pith tunneling > 5 cm; and 5 = dead plant. Using this data, the avg wireworm rating and the proportion of wireworm damaged plants was calculated. Data were subjected to ANOVA and WD, K = 100. Proportion of plants infested was transformed to arcsine √ proportion before ANOVA.