冬季和春季应用Lorsban防治烟草Wikeworms, 1992;

E. Lampert, A. Stephenson
{"title":"冬季和春季应用Lorsban防治烟草Wikeworms, 1992;","authors":"E. Lampert, A. Stephenson","doi":"10.1093/iat/18.1.282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Plots were established at the Border Belt Tobacco Research Station near Whiteville, NC, on 3 Mar. Plots were 22 plants long (ca 13.7 m) and 4 rows wide (1.2 m between rows) and were arranged according to a randomized complete-block design having 8 treatments and 4 blocks. The predominant soil type was Goldsboro fine sandy loam (pH 6.5). Winter treatments were made on 3 Mar and spring treatments were made on 23 Apr. Sprays were applied using a CO2-powered sprayer fitted with 5, 8004 Spraying Systems flat-fan nozzles (20 inches apart) on a 80 inch boom at 30 psi and a delivery rate of 25 gal/acre. All treatments were incorporated via ridging immediately after application. Tobacco was transplanted on 24 Apr. Soil moisture was excellent at the time of transplanting. Twenty-six days after transplanting, 10 consecutive plants from row 2 in each plot were gently pulled from the soil. The roots and underground portions of the stems were visually examined and rated for wireworm damage as follows: 0 = no damage; 1 = feeding scars on root surface; 2 = feeding reaching pith with tunneling < 1 cm; 3 = pit tunneling from 1-5 cm; 4 = pith tunneling > 5 cm; and 5 = dead plant. Using this data, the avg wireworm rating and the proportion of wireworm damaged plants was calculated. Data were subjected to ANOVA and WD, K = 100. Proportion of plants infested was transformed to arcsine √ proportion before ANOVA.","PeriodicalId":13691,"journal":{"name":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","volume":"165 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control of Tobacco Wikeworms with Winter and Spring Applications of Lorsban, 1992:\",\"authors\":\"E. Lampert, A. Stephenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/iat/18.1.282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Plots were established at the Border Belt Tobacco Research Station near Whiteville, NC, on 3 Mar. Plots were 22 plants long (ca 13.7 m) and 4 rows wide (1.2 m between rows) and were arranged according to a randomized complete-block design having 8 treatments and 4 blocks. The predominant soil type was Goldsboro fine sandy loam (pH 6.5). Winter treatments were made on 3 Mar and spring treatments were made on 23 Apr. Sprays were applied using a CO2-powered sprayer fitted with 5, 8004 Spraying Systems flat-fan nozzles (20 inches apart) on a 80 inch boom at 30 psi and a delivery rate of 25 gal/acre. All treatments were incorporated via ridging immediately after application. Tobacco was transplanted on 24 Apr. Soil moisture was excellent at the time of transplanting. Twenty-six days after transplanting, 10 consecutive plants from row 2 in each plot were gently pulled from the soil. The roots and underground portions of the stems were visually examined and rated for wireworm damage as follows: 0 = no damage; 1 = feeding scars on root surface; 2 = feeding reaching pith with tunneling < 1 cm; 3 = pit tunneling from 1-5 cm; 4 = pith tunneling > 5 cm; and 5 = dead plant. Using this data, the avg wireworm rating and the proportion of wireworm damaged plants was calculated. Data were subjected to ANOVA and WD, K = 100. Proportion of plants infested was transformed to arcsine √ proportion before ANOVA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests\",\"volume\":\"165 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

试验于3月3日在美国北卡罗来纳州怀特维尔附近的边境带烟草研究站建立样地,样地长22株(约13.7 m),宽4行(行间1.2 m),按8个处理4块的随机全区设计进行布置。主要土壤类型为金氏细砂壤土(pH 6.5)。3月3日进行了冬季处理,4月23日进行了春季处理。在80英寸的吊臂上,使用配有58004个喷涂系统平面风扇喷嘴(间距20英寸)的二氧化碳动力喷雾器进行喷雾,压力为30 psi,输送速率为25加仑/英亩。所有的处理都在应用后立即通过打脊进行。4月24日移栽烟草,移栽时土壤水分优良。移栽26天后,从每个地块的第二行连续10株植株轻轻地拔离土壤。目视检查根和茎的地下部分,并按以下等级对线虫的损害进行评级:0 =无损害;1 =根表面食疤;2 =进料达髓且掘进< 1 cm;3 =基坑掘进距1-5 cm;4 =管髓掘进> 5 cm;5 =死去的植物。利用这些数据,计算了平均丝虫等级和丝虫危害植株的比例。数据进行方差分析和WD分析,K = 100。方差分析前将侵染植物比例转化为反正弦√比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Control of Tobacco Wikeworms with Winter and Spring Applications of Lorsban, 1992:
Plots were established at the Border Belt Tobacco Research Station near Whiteville, NC, on 3 Mar. Plots were 22 plants long (ca 13.7 m) and 4 rows wide (1.2 m between rows) and were arranged according to a randomized complete-block design having 8 treatments and 4 blocks. The predominant soil type was Goldsboro fine sandy loam (pH 6.5). Winter treatments were made on 3 Mar and spring treatments were made on 23 Apr. Sprays were applied using a CO2-powered sprayer fitted with 5, 8004 Spraying Systems flat-fan nozzles (20 inches apart) on a 80 inch boom at 30 psi and a delivery rate of 25 gal/acre. All treatments were incorporated via ridging immediately after application. Tobacco was transplanted on 24 Apr. Soil moisture was excellent at the time of transplanting. Twenty-six days after transplanting, 10 consecutive plants from row 2 in each plot were gently pulled from the soil. The roots and underground portions of the stems were visually examined and rated for wireworm damage as follows: 0 = no damage; 1 = feeding scars on root surface; 2 = feeding reaching pith with tunneling < 1 cm; 3 = pit tunneling from 1-5 cm; 4 = pith tunneling > 5 cm; and 5 = dead plant. Using this data, the avg wireworm rating and the proportion of wireworm damaged plants was calculated. Data were subjected to ANOVA and WD, K = 100. Proportion of plants infested was transformed to arcsine √ proportion before ANOVA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信