{"title":"哈耶克的Unconventionalism","authors":"G. Jacques","doi":"10.2202/1145-6396.1171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Larticle est un essai qui propose de faire trois additions a la theorie evolutionniste hayekienne.La premiere pour eclairer lemergence des regles, sociales, zone dombre chez Hayek, en introduisant le concept despaces relationnels , embryons des espaces institutionnels.La seconde pour faire apparaitre le role de laction humaine dans levolution des regles sociales : des individus ou groupes dindividus jouent un role entrepreneurial et cherchent a changer des institutions qui ne conviennent pas a leurs exigences ethiques.La derniere pour reintroduire une reference a lordre naturel quHayek avait voulu eliminer, mais qui valide le processus hayekien a condition de retenir une approche subjective du droit naturel (comme lapproche thomiste) par opposition aux approches objectives courantes (sinspirant dAristote et de Puffendorf).This paper tries to add three elements to Hayeks theory of evolution.The first element sheds light on a moot point in Hayeks thought, the emergence of social rules. It does so by introducing the concept of relational spheres, deemed as incipient institutional spheres.The second element tries to make the role of human action conspicuous in the evolution of social rules: individuals or groups of individuals play an entrepreneurial role and seek to alter institutions which are no longer in harmony with their ethical moorings.The last element introduces a reference to natural order which Hayek discarded in his thought. This reference validates the Hayekian process as long as a subjective approach to natural law (as in the Thomistic approach) is retained in contrast to contemporary objective approaches (taking their heed from Aristotle and Puffendorf.)","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":"135 23","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hayek's Unconventionalism\",\"authors\":\"G. Jacques\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1145-6396.1171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Larticle est un essai qui propose de faire trois additions a la theorie evolutionniste hayekienne.La premiere pour eclairer lemergence des regles, sociales, zone dombre chez Hayek, en introduisant le concept despaces relationnels , embryons des espaces institutionnels.La seconde pour faire apparaitre le role de laction humaine dans levolution des regles sociales : des individus ou groupes dindividus jouent un role entrepreneurial et cherchent a changer des institutions qui ne conviennent pas a leurs exigences ethiques.La derniere pour reintroduire une reference a lordre naturel quHayek avait voulu eliminer, mais qui valide le processus hayekien a condition de retenir une approche subjective du droit naturel (comme lapproche thomiste) par opposition aux approches objectives courantes (sinspirant dAristote et de Puffendorf).This paper tries to add three elements to Hayeks theory of evolution.The first element sheds light on a moot point in Hayeks thought, the emergence of social rules. It does so by introducing the concept of relational spheres, deemed as incipient institutional spheres.The second element tries to make the role of human action conspicuous in the evolution of social rules: individuals or groups of individuals play an entrepreneurial role and seek to alter institutions which are no longer in harmony with their ethical moorings.The last element introduces a reference to natural order which Hayek discarded in his thought. This reference validates the Hayekian process as long as a subjective approach to natural law (as in the Thomistic approach) is retained in contrast to contemporary objective approaches (taking their heed from Aristotle and Puffendorf.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":53483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines\",\"volume\":\"135 23\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
这篇文章提出了对哈耶克进化论理论的三个补充。第一个是通过引入关系和平的概念,制度空间的胚胎,来阐明哈耶克的核心社会规则的出现。第二种是揭示人类行为在社会规则演变中的作用:个人或个人群体扮演着企业家的角色,并寻求改变不符合其伦理要求的制度。后者重新引入了对自然法则的引用,quHayek想要消除,但它验证了hayekien过程,条件是保留对自然法的主观方法(如thomist方法),而不是当前的客观方法(灵感来自dAristote和Puffendorf)。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为。in The first元素单间light on a点的模拟、Hayeks thought The涌现of social rules。这是通过引入关系球体的概念,作为早期的制度球体。第二个因素试图使人的行动在社会规则的演变中发挥明显的作用:个人或个人群体发挥企业家的作用,并寻求改变不再符合其道德基础的制度。The last元素introduces a reference to natural order which in his Hayek discarded thought。这一参考证实了Hayekian的过程,因为它是自然法的一种主观方法(如Thomistic方法),与当代客观方法(从亚里士多德和普芬多夫继承的)形成了对比。
Larticle est un essai qui propose de faire trois additions a la theorie evolutionniste hayekienne.La premiere pour eclairer lemergence des regles, sociales, zone dombre chez Hayek, en introduisant le concept despaces relationnels , embryons des espaces institutionnels.La seconde pour faire apparaitre le role de laction humaine dans levolution des regles sociales : des individus ou groupes dindividus jouent un role entrepreneurial et cherchent a changer des institutions qui ne conviennent pas a leurs exigences ethiques.La derniere pour reintroduire une reference a lordre naturel quHayek avait voulu eliminer, mais qui valide le processus hayekien a condition de retenir une approche subjective du droit naturel (comme lapproche thomiste) par opposition aux approches objectives courantes (sinspirant dAristote et de Puffendorf).This paper tries to add three elements to Hayeks theory of evolution.The first element sheds light on a moot point in Hayeks thought, the emergence of social rules. It does so by introducing the concept of relational spheres, deemed as incipient institutional spheres.The second element tries to make the role of human action conspicuous in the evolution of social rules: individuals or groups of individuals play an entrepreneurial role and seek to alter institutions which are no longer in harmony with their ethical moorings.The last element introduces a reference to natural order which Hayek discarded in his thought. This reference validates the Hayekian process as long as a subjective approach to natural law (as in the Thomistic approach) is retained in contrast to contemporary objective approaches (taking their heed from Aristotle and Puffendorf.)
期刊介绍:
The Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines (JEEH) is a journal of political economy and interdisciplinary economic studies. It addresses economic issues in political theory, social dynamics, social science methodology, and philosophy. Today, JEEH has an international audience, and welcomes contributions written by scholars from around the world. JEEH''s goals are: -To bring together economics with neighboring disciplines such as law, history, political science, sociology, philosophy, psychology, and anthropology -To promote the development of the Austrian approach to economics (Austrian School) and to provide discussion and controversy -To reconcile economics with the ethical and policy-oriented principles which make coordinated interaction between human beings possible