多参数磁共振成像后认知融合前列腺活检。与常规随机活检技术的比较

João Magalhães Pina, João Lopes Dias, Ana Meirinha, Raquel João, Pedro Baltazar, Hugo Pinheiro, Francisco Fernandes, Luis Campos Pinheiro
{"title":"多参数磁共振成像后认知融合前列腺活检。与常规随机活检技术的比较","authors":"João Magalhães Pina,&nbsp;João Lopes Dias,&nbsp;Ana Meirinha,&nbsp;Raquel João,&nbsp;Pedro Baltazar,&nbsp;Hugo Pinheiro,&nbsp;Francisco Fernandes,&nbsp;Luis Campos Pinheiro","doi":"10.1016/j.acup.2015.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><p>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the prostate (Mp‐MRI) allows the detection, localization and characterization of suspicious lesions for prostate cancer (PCa). When done prior to the diagnosis it also allows targeting of the biopsy, significantly improving the performance of the standard random prostate biopsy.</p><p>Our goal is to compare a targeted biopsy technique (cognitive fusion) with the standard double sextant randomized prostate biopsy, and to determine which has better accuracy in the detection of cinically significant prostate cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>30 patients aged 61‐67 were selected with a PSA greater than 4<!--> <!-->ng/mL (PSA between 5.6 – 19.2) and with suspicious PCa lesions on Mp‐MRI (Pi‐RADS 3‐5). A total of 75 suspicious lesions were detected.</p><p>All biopsies were performed by the same Urologist (JMP), using trans‐rectal ultrasound guidance and after previous visualization of MRI images. Sampling was targeted to the area considered suspicious on MRI, using a Cognitive Fusion Technique, collecting two samples per area. After that, a double‐sextant standard prostate biopsy was also done in all patients. The variables used for statistical analysis were PCa detection rate and amount of cancer per sample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>22 patients were diagnosed with PCa. In 5 patients, cancer was only detected on targeted cores. Targeted biopsies diagnosed 17% more PCa when compared to random biopsies, and almost doubled the amount of cancer per sample.</p><p>The overall PCa detection rate was 61% for all samples. 360 fragments were collected from standard randomized prostate biopsy, of which 169 were positive for PCa (47%), with a median Gleason score of 6 (3+3). The average amount of cancer per sample was 25% (5%‐85%).</p><p>105 of 150 fragments collected by cognitive fusion targeted biopsies were positive for PCa (70%). The median Gleason score was 7(3+4) with a median amount of cancer per sample of 45% (10%‐90%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Multiparametric prostatic MRI detects areas highly suspicious for PCa, allowing targeted biopsies, which increases diagnostic accuracy and improves the detection of clinically significant PCa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100020,"journal":{"name":"Acta Urológica Portuguesa","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 101-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acup.2015.08.002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biópsia prostática dirigida por fusão cognitiva após ressonância magnética multiparamétrica. Comparação com a técnica habitual de biópsia aleatória\",\"authors\":\"João Magalhães Pina,&nbsp;João Lopes Dias,&nbsp;Ana Meirinha,&nbsp;Raquel João,&nbsp;Pedro Baltazar,&nbsp;Hugo Pinheiro,&nbsp;Francisco Fernandes,&nbsp;Luis Campos Pinheiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acup.2015.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><p>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the prostate (Mp‐MRI) allows the detection, localization and characterization of suspicious lesions for prostate cancer (PCa). When done prior to the diagnosis it also allows targeting of the biopsy, significantly improving the performance of the standard random prostate biopsy.</p><p>Our goal is to compare a targeted biopsy technique (cognitive fusion) with the standard double sextant randomized prostate biopsy, and to determine which has better accuracy in the detection of cinically significant prostate cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>30 patients aged 61‐67 were selected with a PSA greater than 4<!--> <!-->ng/mL (PSA between 5.6 – 19.2) and with suspicious PCa lesions on Mp‐MRI (Pi‐RADS 3‐5). A total of 75 suspicious lesions were detected.</p><p>All biopsies were performed by the same Urologist (JMP), using trans‐rectal ultrasound guidance and after previous visualization of MRI images. Sampling was targeted to the area considered suspicious on MRI, using a Cognitive Fusion Technique, collecting two samples per area. After that, a double‐sextant standard prostate biopsy was also done in all patients. The variables used for statistical analysis were PCa detection rate and amount of cancer per sample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>22 patients were diagnosed with PCa. In 5 patients, cancer was only detected on targeted cores. Targeted biopsies diagnosed 17% more PCa when compared to random biopsies, and almost doubled the amount of cancer per sample.</p><p>The overall PCa detection rate was 61% for all samples. 360 fragments were collected from standard randomized prostate biopsy, of which 169 were positive for PCa (47%), with a median Gleason score of 6 (3+3). The average amount of cancer per sample was 25% (5%‐85%).</p><p>105 of 150 fragments collected by cognitive fusion targeted biopsies were positive for PCa (70%). The median Gleason score was 7(3+4) with a median amount of cancer per sample of 45% (10%‐90%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Multiparametric prostatic MRI detects areas highly suspicious for PCa, allowing targeted biopsies, which increases diagnostic accuracy and improves the detection of clinically significant PCa.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Urológica Portuguesa\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acup.2015.08.002\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Urológica Portuguesa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341402215000579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Urológica Portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341402215000579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

介绍和目的前列腺多参数磁共振成像(Mp‐MRI)可以检测、定位和表征前列腺癌(PCa)的可疑病变。如果在诊断之前进行,它也可以靶向活检,显着提高标准随机前列腺活检的性能。我们的目标是比较靶向活检技术(认知融合)与标准双六分仪随机前列腺活检,并确定哪一种在检测临床意义重大的前列腺癌方面具有更好的准确性。材料和方法选择年龄在61 ~ 67岁的患者30例,PSA大于4 ng/mL (PSA在5.6 ~ 19.2之间),Mp‐MRI上有可疑PCa病变(Pi‐RADS 3‐5)。共检出75个可疑病灶。所有活检均由同一泌尿科医生(JMP)进行,采用经直肠超声引导,并在先前的MRI图像可视化后进行。使用认知融合技术对MRI认为可疑的区域进行采样,每个区域收集两个样本。之后,对所有患者进行双六分仪标准前列腺活检。用于统计分析的变量为PCa检出率和每个样本的癌症数量。结果22例确诊为前列腺癌。在5例患者中,仅在靶核上检测到癌症。与随机活检相比,靶向活检诊断出的前列腺癌多17%,每个样本的癌症数量几乎翻了一番。所有样本的总PCa检出率为61%。标准随机前列腺活检收集360片,其中169片PCa阳性(47%),Gleason评分中位数为6(3+3)。每个样本的平均癌症发生率为25%(5% - 85%)。认知融合靶向活检收集的150个碎片中有105个PCa阳性(70%)。Gleason评分中位数为7(3+4),每个样本中位数癌症发生率为45%(10%‐90%)。结论多参数前列腺MRI可检测出前列腺癌高度可疑的区域,可进行有针对性的活检,提高了诊断准确性,提高了临床意义的前列腺癌的检出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biópsia prostática dirigida por fusão cognitiva após ressonância magnética multiparamétrica. Comparação com a técnica habitual de biópsia aleatória

Introduction and Objectives

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the prostate (Mp‐MRI) allows the detection, localization and characterization of suspicious lesions for prostate cancer (PCa). When done prior to the diagnosis it also allows targeting of the biopsy, significantly improving the performance of the standard random prostate biopsy.

Our goal is to compare a targeted biopsy technique (cognitive fusion) with the standard double sextant randomized prostate biopsy, and to determine which has better accuracy in the detection of cinically significant prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

30 patients aged 61‐67 were selected with a PSA greater than 4 ng/mL (PSA between 5.6 – 19.2) and with suspicious PCa lesions on Mp‐MRI (Pi‐RADS 3‐5). A total of 75 suspicious lesions were detected.

All biopsies were performed by the same Urologist (JMP), using trans‐rectal ultrasound guidance and after previous visualization of MRI images. Sampling was targeted to the area considered suspicious on MRI, using a Cognitive Fusion Technique, collecting two samples per area. After that, a double‐sextant standard prostate biopsy was also done in all patients. The variables used for statistical analysis were PCa detection rate and amount of cancer per sample.

Results

22 patients were diagnosed with PCa. In 5 patients, cancer was only detected on targeted cores. Targeted biopsies diagnosed 17% more PCa when compared to random biopsies, and almost doubled the amount of cancer per sample.

The overall PCa detection rate was 61% for all samples. 360 fragments were collected from standard randomized prostate biopsy, of which 169 were positive for PCa (47%), with a median Gleason score of 6 (3+3). The average amount of cancer per sample was 25% (5%‐85%).

105 of 150 fragments collected by cognitive fusion targeted biopsies were positive for PCa (70%). The median Gleason score was 7(3+4) with a median amount of cancer per sample of 45% (10%‐90%).

Conclusions

Multiparametric prostatic MRI detects areas highly suspicious for PCa, allowing targeted biopsies, which increases diagnostic accuracy and improves the detection of clinically significant PCa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信