中国北方全新世前现代人群的咀嚼特征。

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Qian Wang, Qun Zhang, Tao Han, Zhichao Sun, P. Dechow, Hong Zhu, Quanchao Zhang
{"title":"中国北方全新世前现代人群的咀嚼特征。","authors":"Qian Wang, Qun Zhang, Tao Han, Zhichao Sun, P. Dechow, Hong Zhu, Quanchao Zhang","doi":"10.1127/HOMO/2019/1007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies indicate that evolution of the craniofacial skeleton is influenced by dietary behavior, which in turn alters masticatory efficacy and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) stability. In this study the mechanical properties of the masticatory system and the integrity of the TMJ in human populations from Northern China, dated to between 3800 BCE and 100 CE, were assessed. The results demonstrate that the mechanical efficiency is comparable to other modern human populations, though variations are present across different populations. While the ratio of overall weighted muscle efficiency for incisor loading vs. molar loading in pastoral and some recent agricultural groups is similar to early Homo sapiens, the ratio in more ancient agricultural groups is similar to the ratio in populations with heavy anterior paramasticatory activities, such as Neandertals, Inuits, and Native Americans. The TMJ vulnerability negatively correlates with the maxillary dental arch size, and positively with the condylar size. These findings suggest that there are multi-directional strategies in adaptation to heavy anterior teeth loading, such as increasing anterior teeth loading efficiency, increasing facial height, increasing facial breath and facial orthognathy, or decreasing anterior facial length. Furthermore, populations or individuals with a smaller dental arch and high biting efficiency could more easily injure the TMJ during unilateral loadings, which may explain the higher prevalence of TMJ disorders in modern humans, especially in women. These findings further reflect the impact of diachronic changes of the masticatory apparatus and lifestyle and their impact on oral health during recent human history.","PeriodicalId":46714,"journal":{"name":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","volume":"105 -108 1","pages":"15-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Masticatory properties in pre-modern Holocene populations from Northern China.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Wang, Qun Zhang, Tao Han, Zhichao Sun, P. Dechow, Hong Zhu, Quanchao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1127/HOMO/2019/1007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent studies indicate that evolution of the craniofacial skeleton is influenced by dietary behavior, which in turn alters masticatory efficacy and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) stability. In this study the mechanical properties of the masticatory system and the integrity of the TMJ in human populations from Northern China, dated to between 3800 BCE and 100 CE, were assessed. The results demonstrate that the mechanical efficiency is comparable to other modern human populations, though variations are present across different populations. While the ratio of overall weighted muscle efficiency for incisor loading vs. molar loading in pastoral and some recent agricultural groups is similar to early Homo sapiens, the ratio in more ancient agricultural groups is similar to the ratio in populations with heavy anterior paramasticatory activities, such as Neandertals, Inuits, and Native Americans. The TMJ vulnerability negatively correlates with the maxillary dental arch size, and positively with the condylar size. These findings suggest that there are multi-directional strategies in adaptation to heavy anterior teeth loading, such as increasing anterior teeth loading efficiency, increasing facial height, increasing facial breath and facial orthognathy, or decreasing anterior facial length. Furthermore, populations or individuals with a smaller dental arch and high biting efficiency could more easily injure the TMJ during unilateral loadings, which may explain the higher prevalence of TMJ disorders in modern humans, especially in women. These findings further reflect the impact of diachronic changes of the masticatory apparatus and lifestyle and their impact on oral health during recent human history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology\",\"volume\":\"105 -108 1\",\"pages\":\"15-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1127/HOMO/2019/1007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/HOMO/2019/1007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近的研究表明,颅面骨骼的进化受饮食行为的影响,从而改变咀嚼功能和颞下颌关节(TMJ)的稳定性。本研究评估了公元前3800年至公元前100年中国北方人群咀嚼系统的力学特性和颞下颌关节的完整性。结果表明,机械效率与其他现代人类人群相当,尽管不同人群之间存在差异。虽然在牧区和一些现代农业群体中,门牙负荷与磨牙负荷的总体加权肌肉效率之比与早期智人相似,但在更古老的农业群体中,这一比例与尼安德特人、因纽特人和美洲原住民等具有大量前咀嚼活动的人群的比例相似。TMJ易损性与上颌牙弓大小呈负相关,与髁突大小呈正相关。这些结果表明,在适应前牙重负荷方面存在多向策略,如提高前牙负荷效率,增加面部高度,增加面部呼吸和面部正颌,或减少前牙长度。此外,牙弓较小、咬合效率高的人群或个体在单侧负荷时更容易损伤TMJ,这可能解释了现代人类,尤其是女性TMJ疾病患病率较高的原因。这些发现进一步反映了近代人类咀嚼器官和生活方式的历时性变化及其对口腔健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Masticatory properties in pre-modern Holocene populations from Northern China.
Recent studies indicate that evolution of the craniofacial skeleton is influenced by dietary behavior, which in turn alters masticatory efficacy and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) stability. In this study the mechanical properties of the masticatory system and the integrity of the TMJ in human populations from Northern China, dated to between 3800 BCE and 100 CE, were assessed. The results demonstrate that the mechanical efficiency is comparable to other modern human populations, though variations are present across different populations. While the ratio of overall weighted muscle efficiency for incisor loading vs. molar loading in pastoral and some recent agricultural groups is similar to early Homo sapiens, the ratio in more ancient agricultural groups is similar to the ratio in populations with heavy anterior paramasticatory activities, such as Neandertals, Inuits, and Native Americans. The TMJ vulnerability negatively correlates with the maxillary dental arch size, and positively with the condylar size. These findings suggest that there are multi-directional strategies in adaptation to heavy anterior teeth loading, such as increasing anterior teeth loading efficiency, increasing facial height, increasing facial breath and facial orthognathy, or decreasing anterior facial length. Furthermore, populations or individuals with a smaller dental arch and high biting efficiency could more easily injure the TMJ during unilateral loadings, which may explain the higher prevalence of TMJ disorders in modern humans, especially in women. These findings further reflect the impact of diachronic changes of the masticatory apparatus and lifestyle and their impact on oral health during recent human history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信