印尼的转诊制度实施是否正确?

Eska Distia Permatasari, Ernawaty
{"title":"印尼的转诊制度实施是否正确?","authors":"Eska Distia Permatasari, Ernawaty","doi":"10.32827/ijphcs.6.1.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Policies on referral systems have long existed in Indonesia. Nonspecialistic references are still occurring and result inefficienty of health care. BPJS Kesehatan stated that there were 2.236.379 visits in the primary health care facilities referred in 2015, 214.706 visits of which were non nonspecificistic referrals. In 2016 there was an increase of 4.9 million cases of re-control compared to 2015 in secondary and tertiary outpatient, resulting in an increase in cost of 789 billion compared to 2015. This is because the referral system policy hasn’t been implement correctly. This policy brief aims to evaluate the implementation of referral system policies that exist in Indonesia. Materials and Methods: This is a policy brief with literature review approach. This policy brief was prepared by conducting literature studies on the implementation of referral systems and several health policies on referrals Result: Referral system has not been implemented properly in accordance with existing policies in Indonesia. This causes wastage costs in the implementation of universal health coverage. Implementation constraints on referral policies stem from the low knowledge of health personnel and the capacity of health care providers. Conclusion: It is appropriate to evaluate all of personel who play a role in the implementation of referral policy. Evaluation should be done from the community as the recipient of the service, health facilities as the buyer of service, the health office as the responsible implementation of referrals, as well as from the government as policy makers. Thus solutions to problems with this reference system can be applied so that the correct referral system can be realized.","PeriodicalId":14315,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","volume":"8 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REFERRAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA, HAS IT BEEN IMPLEMENTED CORRECTLY?\",\"authors\":\"Eska Distia Permatasari, Ernawaty\",\"doi\":\"10.32827/ijphcs.6.1.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Policies on referral systems have long existed in Indonesia. Nonspecialistic references are still occurring and result inefficienty of health care. BPJS Kesehatan stated that there were 2.236.379 visits in the primary health care facilities referred in 2015, 214.706 visits of which were non nonspecificistic referrals. In 2016 there was an increase of 4.9 million cases of re-control compared to 2015 in secondary and tertiary outpatient, resulting in an increase in cost of 789 billion compared to 2015. This is because the referral system policy hasn’t been implement correctly. This policy brief aims to evaluate the implementation of referral system policies that exist in Indonesia. Materials and Methods: This is a policy brief with literature review approach. This policy brief was prepared by conducting literature studies on the implementation of referral systems and several health policies on referrals Result: Referral system has not been implemented properly in accordance with existing policies in Indonesia. This causes wastage costs in the implementation of universal health coverage. Implementation constraints on referral policies stem from the low knowledge of health personnel and the capacity of health care providers. Conclusion: It is appropriate to evaluate all of personel who play a role in the implementation of referral policy. Evaluation should be done from the community as the recipient of the service, health facilities as the buyer of service, the health office as the responsible implementation of referrals, as well as from the government as policy makers. Thus solutions to problems with this reference system can be applied so that the correct referral system can be realized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"8 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32827/ijphcs.6.1.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32827/ijphcs.6.1.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:印度尼西亚长期存在转诊制度政策。非专业参考仍然存在,导致卫生保健效率低下。BPJS Kesehatan指出,2015年有2.236.379人次转诊到初级卫生保健设施,其中214.706人次是非特异性转诊。与2015年相比,2016年二级和三级门诊的再控制病例增加了490万例,导致费用比2015年增加了7890亿美元。这是因为转诊制度政策没有得到正确的执行。本政策简报旨在评估印度尼西亚现有的转诊制度政策的实施情况。材料和方法:这是一份采用文献综述方法的政策简报。这份政策简报是通过对转诊制度的实施情况和关于转诊的若干卫生政策进行文献研究编写的。结果:转诊制度没有按照印度尼西亚现有政策得到适当实施。这在实施全民健康覆盖方面造成了成本浪费。对转诊政策的实施限制源于保健人员的知识不足和保健提供者的能力不足。结论:对所有参与转诊政策实施的人员进行评估是合适的。应从作为服务接受者的社区、作为服务购买者的卫生设施、作为负责转诊的卫生办公室以及作为政策制定者的政府进行评价。因此,解决这一转诊制度存在的问题,才能实现正确的转诊制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
REFERRAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA, HAS IT BEEN IMPLEMENTED CORRECTLY?
Background: Policies on referral systems have long existed in Indonesia. Nonspecialistic references are still occurring and result inefficienty of health care. BPJS Kesehatan stated that there were 2.236.379 visits in the primary health care facilities referred in 2015, 214.706 visits of which were non nonspecificistic referrals. In 2016 there was an increase of 4.9 million cases of re-control compared to 2015 in secondary and tertiary outpatient, resulting in an increase in cost of 789 billion compared to 2015. This is because the referral system policy hasn’t been implement correctly. This policy brief aims to evaluate the implementation of referral system policies that exist in Indonesia. Materials and Methods: This is a policy brief with literature review approach. This policy brief was prepared by conducting literature studies on the implementation of referral systems and several health policies on referrals Result: Referral system has not been implemented properly in accordance with existing policies in Indonesia. This causes wastage costs in the implementation of universal health coverage. Implementation constraints on referral policies stem from the low knowledge of health personnel and the capacity of health care providers. Conclusion: It is appropriate to evaluate all of personel who play a role in the implementation of referral policy. Evaluation should be done from the community as the recipient of the service, health facilities as the buyer of service, the health office as the responsible implementation of referrals, as well as from the government as policy makers. Thus solutions to problems with this reference system can be applied so that the correct referral system can be realized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信