{"title":"比较危机与世界文学之争","authors":"David Porter","doi":"10.1632/PROF.2011.2011.1.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current debates over the disciplinary categories of comparative literature and world literature provide an occasion for rethinking the governing taxonomies of literary study. This article offers an overview of important recent books by David Damrosch, Pascale Casanova, and Franco Moretti and builds on their arguments to propose an alternative framework for classifying literary works that foregrounds their mobility, capacity for regeneration, and functional diversity. (DP)","PeriodicalId":86631,"journal":{"name":"The Osteopathic profession","volume":"18 1","pages":"244-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1632/PROF.2011.2011.1.244","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Crisis of Comparison and the World Literature Debates\",\"authors\":\"David Porter\",\"doi\":\"10.1632/PROF.2011.2011.1.244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current debates over the disciplinary categories of comparative literature and world literature provide an occasion for rethinking the governing taxonomies of literary study. This article offers an overview of important recent books by David Damrosch, Pascale Casanova, and Franco Moretti and builds on their arguments to propose an alternative framework for classifying literary works that foregrounds their mobility, capacity for regeneration, and functional diversity. (DP)\",\"PeriodicalId\":86631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Osteopathic profession\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"244-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1632/PROF.2011.2011.1.244\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Osteopathic profession\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2011.2011.1.244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Osteopathic profession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2011.2011.1.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Crisis of Comparison and the World Literature Debates
Current debates over the disciplinary categories of comparative literature and world literature provide an occasion for rethinking the governing taxonomies of literary study. This article offers an overview of important recent books by David Damrosch, Pascale Casanova, and Franco Moretti and builds on their arguments to propose an alternative framework for classifying literary works that foregrounds their mobility, capacity for regeneration, and functional diversity. (DP)
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
