人类学对法律重要吗?

Jeremy J. Kingsley, Kari G. Telle
{"title":"人类学对法律重要吗?","authors":"Jeremy J. Kingsley, Kari G. Telle","doi":"10.3167/JLA.2018.020205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At a time of ‘interdisciplinary’ scholarly debate and ‘transdisciplinary’\npedagogy, some disciplines appear more siloed and tone deaf to each\nother than ever before. This article will consider why law and anthropology\nas disciplines offer almost no impact upon each other’s educational\nor research agendas.","PeriodicalId":34676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Anthropology Matter to Law?\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy J. Kingsley, Kari G. Telle\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/JLA.2018.020205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At a time of ‘interdisciplinary’ scholarly debate and ‘transdisciplinary’\\npedagogy, some disciplines appear more siloed and tone deaf to each\\nother than ever before. This article will consider why law and anthropology\\nas disciplines offer almost no impact upon each other’s educational\\nor research agendas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一个“跨学科”学术辩论和“跨学科”教学法盛行的时代,一些学科似乎比以往任何时候都更加孤立,对彼此充耳不闻。本文将考虑为什么法律和人类学学科对彼此的教育或研究议程几乎没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Anthropology Matter to Law?
At a time of ‘interdisciplinary’ scholarly debate and ‘transdisciplinary’ pedagogy, some disciplines appear more siloed and tone deaf to each other than ever before. This article will consider why law and anthropology as disciplines offer almost no impact upon each other’s educational or research agendas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信