凡人的礼物:一篇关于治疗师死亡的两部分文章。第一部分:不合时宜的损失。

E. Pinsky
{"title":"凡人的礼物:一篇关于治疗师死亡的两部分文章。第一部分:不合时宜的损失。","authors":"E. Pinsky","doi":"10.1521/JAAP.30.2.173.21949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The absence of theoretical and practical provisions for the patient whose therapist dies or becomes seriously ill reflects underlying problems regarding termination. Therapy is unique among human intimacies in that its goal is separation, a paradox that informs both the near-silence of early termination theory and the confusion in more recent writing. The therapist's emotional involvement must be understood through the therapeutic relationship as part of \"mortal\" life, that is, as a specialized category within ordinary human interactions. The profession has neglected the therapist's mortality, in figurative as well as literal senses. This neglect, a covert grandiosity, is the \"Olympian Delusion.\" On one level, inadequate termination theory underlines failure to confront the therapist's mortality; more profoundly, failure to confront the therapist's mortality underlies deficiencies in termination theory. The mystique of the superhuman therapist can lead to a professional reticence that is less than fully human, abrogating the patient's right to a decent, human leave taking.","PeriodicalId":76662,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis","volume":"70 1","pages":"173-204; discussion 205-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1521/JAAP.30.2.173.21949","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortal gifts: a two-part essay on the therapist's mortality. Part I: untimely loss.\",\"authors\":\"E. Pinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/JAAP.30.2.173.21949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The absence of theoretical and practical provisions for the patient whose therapist dies or becomes seriously ill reflects underlying problems regarding termination. Therapy is unique among human intimacies in that its goal is separation, a paradox that informs both the near-silence of early termination theory and the confusion in more recent writing. The therapist's emotional involvement must be understood through the therapeutic relationship as part of \\\"mortal\\\" life, that is, as a specialized category within ordinary human interactions. The profession has neglected the therapist's mortality, in figurative as well as literal senses. This neglect, a covert grandiosity, is the \\\"Olympian Delusion.\\\" On one level, inadequate termination theory underlines failure to confront the therapist's mortality; more profoundly, failure to confront the therapist's mortality underlies deficiencies in termination theory. The mystique of the superhuman therapist can lead to a professional reticence that is less than fully human, abrogating the patient's right to a decent, human leave taking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"173-204; discussion 205-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1521/JAAP.30.2.173.21949\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/JAAP.30.2.173.21949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/JAAP.30.2.173.21949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

对于治疗师死亡或病情严重的患者,缺乏理论和实践规定反映了有关终止治疗的潜在问题。治疗在人类亲密关系中是独一无二的,因为它的目标是分离,这是一个悖论,既说明了早期终止理论的近乎沉默,也说明了最近写作中的困惑。治疗师的情感参与必须通过治疗关系来理解,作为“凡人”生活的一部分,也就是说,作为普通人类互动中的一个特殊类别。这个行业忽视了治疗师的死亡,无论是在比喻意义上还是在字面意义上。这种忽视,一种隐蔽的夸大,就是“奥林匹斯妄想”。在一个层面上,不充分的终止理论强调了面对治疗师死亡的失败;更深刻的是,未能直面治疗师的死亡是终止理论的缺陷。超人治疗师的神秘感可能会导致一种不完全人性的专业沉默,从而剥夺了患者体面地告别的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mortal gifts: a two-part essay on the therapist's mortality. Part I: untimely loss.
The absence of theoretical and practical provisions for the patient whose therapist dies or becomes seriously ill reflects underlying problems regarding termination. Therapy is unique among human intimacies in that its goal is separation, a paradox that informs both the near-silence of early termination theory and the confusion in more recent writing. The therapist's emotional involvement must be understood through the therapeutic relationship as part of "mortal" life, that is, as a specialized category within ordinary human interactions. The profession has neglected the therapist's mortality, in figurative as well as literal senses. This neglect, a covert grandiosity, is the "Olympian Delusion." On one level, inadequate termination theory underlines failure to confront the therapist's mortality; more profoundly, failure to confront the therapist's mortality underlies deficiencies in termination theory. The mystique of the superhuman therapist can lead to a professional reticence that is less than fully human, abrogating the patient's right to a decent, human leave taking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信